Literature DB >> 2023564

Clinical trials in cancer therapy: efforts to improve patient enrollment by community oncologists.

W B Fisher1, S J Cohen, M K Hammond, S Turner, P J Loehrer.   

Abstract

A prerequisite for the completion of a clinical trial is the accrual of adequate numbers of patients. It is estimated that over 90-95% of all cancer patients are now treated in their local communities by practicing oncologists and are not seen by primary investigators at teaching hospitals. One risk of this trend is decreased patient enrollment into clinical trials. The private practitioner often lacks the academic oncologist's incentives to participate in clinical research. The Hoosier Oncology Group (HOG) is composed of community medical and radiation oncologists (85%) and Indiana University faculty members (15%). In an effort to improve patient enrollment onto clinical cancer research trials, HOG has attempted to identify 1) the major obstacles to patient enrollment by community oncologists and 2) potential aids to overcome such obstacles. One hundred fourteen members were surveyed and 75 responded (66%). The major obstacles were, in descending order: time demands on both the oncologist and his staff; explaining clinical trials to patients; completing flow sheets; perceived increased cost to the patient; remembering protocols; adhering to a rigid protocol. Aids identified as potentially most helpful were, in descending order: pocket-sized synopses of protocols; computer generated, individualized prompts; the availability of a clinical trials specialist to explain the clinical trial to patients and assist in obtaining informed consent; the availability of a video tape which could be used to explain clinical trials to patients. These aids are being implemented with the attempt to systemically study their impact on patient accrual.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 2023564     DOI: 10.1002/mpo.2950190304

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Pediatr Oncol        ISSN: 0098-1532


  6 in total

1.  Feasibility, acceptability and findings from a pilot randomized controlled intervention study on the impact of a book designed to inform patients about cancer clinical trials.

Authors:  Patricia A Carney; Erin K Tucker; Timothy A Newby; Tomasz M Beer
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 2.037

2.  Analysis of Factors Affecting Successful Clinical Trial Enrollment in the Context of Three Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Trials.

Authors:  Jennifer K Logan; Chad Tang; Zhongxing Liao; J Jack Lee; John V Heymach; Stephen G Swisher; James W Welsh; Jianjun Zhang; Steven H Lin; Daniel R Gomez
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2016-11-27       Impact factor: 7.038

3.  Effect of a clinical trial alert system on physician participation in trial recruitment.

Authors:  Peter J Embi; Anil Jain; Jeffrey Clark; Susan Bizjack; Richard Hornung; C Martin Harris
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2005-10-24

4.  Physician participation in clinical research and trials: issues and approaches.

Authors:  Sayeeda Rahman; Md Anwarul Azim Majumder; Sami F Shaban; Nuzhat Rahman; Moslehuddin Ahmed; Khalid Bin Abdulrahman; Urban Ja D'Souza
Journal:  Adv Med Educ Pract       Date:  2011-03-07

5.  Increasing participation of cancer patients in randomised controlled trials: a systematic review.

Authors:  Catriona Mc Daid; Zoé Hodges; Debra Fayter; Lisa Stirk; Alison Eastwood
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2006-05-17       Impact factor: 2.279

6.  Patient perceptions concerning clinical trials in oncology patients.

Authors:  A L Dias; J H Chao; D Lee; Y Wu; G H Kloecker
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials Commun       Date:  2016-09-21
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.