Literature DB >> 20235314

The structural rigidity of the cranium of Australopithecus africanus: implications for diet, dietary adaptations, and the allometry of feeding biomechanics.

David S Strait1, Ian R Grosse, Paul C Dechow, Amanda L Smith, Qian Wang, Gerhard W Weber, Simon Neubauer, Dennis E Slice, Janine Chalk, Brian G Richmond, Peter W Lucas, Mark A Spencer, Caitlin Schrein, Barth W Wright, Craig Byron, Callum F Ross.   

Abstract

Australopithecus africanus is an early hominin (i.e., human relative) believed to exhibit stress-reducing adaptations in its craniofacial skeleton that may be related to the consumption of resistant food items using its premolar teeth. Finite element analyses simulating molar and premolar biting were used to test the hypothesis that the cranium of A. africanus is structurally more rigid than that of Macaca fascicularis, an Old World monkey that lacks derived australopith facial features. Previously generated finite element models of crania of these species were subjected to isometrically scaled loads, permitting a direct comparison of strain magnitudes. Moreover, strain energy (SE) in the models was compared after results were scaled to account for differences in bone volume and muscle forces. Results indicate that strains in certain skeletal regions below the orbits are higher in M. fascicularis than in A. africanus. Moreover, although premolar bites produce von Mises strains in the rostrum that are elevated relative to those produced by molar biting in both species, rostral strains are much higher in the macaque than in the australopith. These data suggest that at least the midface of A. africanus is more rigid than that of M. fascicularis. Comparisons of SE reveal that the A. africanus cranium is, overall, more rigid than that of M. fascicularis during premolar biting. This is consistent with the hypothesis that this hominin may have periodically consumed large, hard food items. However, the SE data suggest that the A. africanus cranium is marginally less rigid than that of the macaque during molar biting. It is hypothesized that the SE results are being influenced by the allometric scaling of cranial cortical bone thickness. (c) 2010 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20235314     DOI: 10.1002/ar.21122

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anat Rec (Hoboken)        ISSN: 1932-8486            Impact factor:   2.064


  17 in total

1.  Elastic anisotropy and off-axis ultrasonic velocity distribution in human cortical bone.

Authors:  Dong Hwa Chung; Paul C Dechow
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2010-11-14       Impact factor: 2.610

2.  The biomechanics of foraging determines face length among kangaroos and their relatives.

Authors:  D Rex Mitchell; Emma Sherratt; Justin A Ledogar; Stephen Wroe
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2018-06-27       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Biomechanics of the mandible of Macaca mulatta during the power stroke of mastication: Loading, deformation, and strain regimes and the impact of food type.

Authors:  Olga Panagiotopoulou; Jose Iriarte-Diaz; Hyab Mehari Abraha; Andrea B Taylor; Simon Wilshin; Paul C Dechow; Callum F Ross
Journal:  J Hum Evol       Date:  2020-09-06       Impact factor: 3.895

4.  The Biomechanics of Zygomatic Arch Shape.

Authors:  Amanda L Smith; Ian R Grosse
Journal:  Anat Rec (Hoboken)       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 2.064

5.  The feeding biomechanics and dietary ecology of Paranthropus boisei.

Authors:  Amanda L Smith; Stefano Benazzi; Justin A Ledogar; Kelli Tamvada; Leslie C Pryor Smith; Gerhard W Weber; Mark A Spencer; Peter W Lucas; Shaji Michael; Ali Shekeban; Khaled Al-Fadhalah; Abdulwahab S Almusallam; Paul C Dechow; Ian R Grosse; Callum F Ross; Richard H Madden; Brian G Richmond; Barth W Wright; Qian Wang; Craig Byron; Dennis E Slice; Sarah Wood; Christine Dzialo; Michael A Berthaume; Adam van Casteren; David S Strait
Journal:  Anat Rec (Hoboken)       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 2.064

6.  Computational biomechanical analyses demonstrate similar shell-crushing abilities in modern and ancient arthropods.

Authors:  Russell D C Bicknell; Justin A Ledogar; Stephen Wroe; Benjamin C Gutzler; Winsor H Watson; John R Paterson
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2018-10-24       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Computer simulations show that Neanderthal facial morphology represents adaptation to cold and high energy demands, but not heavy biting.

Authors:  Stephen Wroe; William C H Parr; Justin A Ledogar; Jason Bourke; Samuel P Evans; Luca Fiorenza; Stefano Benazzi; Jean-Jacques Hublin; Chris Stringer; Ottmar Kullmer; Michael Curry; Todd C Rae; Todd R Yokley
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2018-04-11       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  An efficient method of modeling material properties using a thermal diffusion analogy: an example based on craniofacial bone.

Authors:  Julian L Davis; Elizabeth R Dumont; David S Strait; Ian R Grosse
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-02-11       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  The effect of unerupted permanent tooth crowns on the distribution of masticatory stress in children.

Authors:  Ashley S Hammond; Elizabeth R Dumont; Robert C McCarthy
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-12-14       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Comparative Biomechanical Modeling of Metatherian and Placental Saber-Tooths: A Different Kind of Bite for an Extreme Pouched Predator.

Authors:  Stephen Wroe; Uphar Chamoli; William C H Parr; Philip Clausen; Ryan Ridgely; Lawrence Witmer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-26       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.