Literature DB >> 20234392

Replication of past candidate loci for common diseases and phenotypes in 100 genome-wide association studies.

Konstantinos C M Siontis1, Nikolaos A Patsopoulos, John P A Ioannidis.   

Abstract

Genome-wide association studies (GWASs) have created a paradigm shift in discovering genetic associations for common diseases and phenotypes, but it is unclear whether the thousands of candidate genetic association studies performed in the pre-GWAS era had found any reliable associations for common diseases and phenotypes. We aimed to systematically evaluate whether loci proposed to harbor candidate associations before the advent of GWASs are replicated in GWASs. The GWAS data published through August, 2008 and included in the NHGRI catalog were screened and variants in candidate loci were selected on the basis of statistical significance (P<0.05) to create a list of independent, non-redundant associations. Altogether, 159 articles on GWASs were evaluated, 100 of which addressed past proposed candidate loci. A total of 291 independent, nominally significant (P<0.05) candidate gene associations were assembled after keeping only the SNP with lowest P-value for each locus and each phenotype; 108 of those had P<10(-3) for association and 41 had P<10(-7). A total of 22 of these 41 candidate gene associations pertained to binary phenotypes with a median odds ratio=2.91 (IQR: 1.82-4.6) and median minor allele frequency=0.17 (IQR: 0.12-0.29) in Caucasians; for comparison, 60 new associations of binary outcomes with P<10(-7) discovered in the same GWASs had much smaller effects (median odds ratio 1.30, IQR: 1.18-1.58) and modestly larger minor allele frequencies (median 0.27, IQR: 0.15-0.43). Overall, few of the numerous genetic associations proposed in the candidate gene era have been replicated in GWASs, but those that have been conclusively replicated have large genetic effects that should not be discarded.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20234392      PMCID: PMC2987361          DOI: 10.1038/ejhg.2010.26

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet        ISSN: 1018-4813            Impact factor:   4.246


  38 in total

1.  Replication validity of genetic association studies.

Authors:  J P Ioannidis; E E Ntzani; T A Trikalinos; D G Contopoulos-Ioannidis
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 38.330

Review 2.  Genetic associations: false or true?

Authors:  John P A Ioannidis
Journal:  Trends Mol Med       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 11.951

3.  Genetic association studies.

Authors:  Heather J Cordell; David G Clayton
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2005 Sep 24-30       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  Genetics. Delivering new disease genes.

Authors:  Lon R Cardon
Journal:  Science       Date:  2006-12-01       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Evaluating coverage of genome-wide association studies.

Authors:  Jeffrey C Barrett; Lon R Cardon
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2006-05-21       Impact factor: 38.330

6.  A full genome scan for late onset Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  P Kehoe; F Wavrant-De Vrieze; R Crook; W S Wu; P Holmans; I Fenton; G Spurlock; N Norton; H Williams; N Williams; S Lovestone; J Perez-Tur; M Hutton; M C Chartier-Harlin; S Shears; K Roehl; J Booth; W Van Voorst; D Ramic; J Williams; A Goate; J Hardy; M J Owen
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 6.150

Review 7.  Tracking the epidemiology of human genes in the literature: the HuGE Published Literature database.

Authors:  Bruce K Lin; Melinda Clyne; Matthew Walsh; Onnalee Gomez; Wei Yu; Marta Gwinn; Muin J Khoury
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2006-04-26       Impact factor: 4.897

8.  A genome-wide search for susceptibility genes in human systemic lupus erythematosus sib-pair families.

Authors:  P M Gaffney; G M Kearns; K B Shark; W A Ortmann; S A Selby; M L Malmgren; K E Rohlf; T C Ockenden; R P Messner; R A King; S S Rich; T W Behrens
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1998-12-08       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 9.  A comprehensive review of genetic association studies.

Authors:  Joel N Hirschhorn; Kirk Lohmueller; Edward Byrne; Kurt Hirschhorn
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2002 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 8.822

10.  A road map for efficient and reliable human genome epidemiology.

Authors:  John P A Ioannidis; Marta Gwinn; Julian Little; Julian P T Higgins; Jonine L Bernstein; Paolo Boffetta; Melissa Bondy; Molly S Bray; Paul E Brenchley; Patricia A Buffler; Juan Pablo Casas; Anand Chokkalingam; John Danesh; George Davey Smith; Siobhan Dolan; Ross Duncan; Nelleke A Gruis; Patricia Hartge; Mia Hashibe; David J Hunter; Marjo-Riitta Jarvelin; Beatrice Malmer; Demetrius M Maraganore; Julia A Newton-Bishop; Thomas R O'Brien; Gloria Petersen; Elio Riboli; Georgia Salanti; Daniela Seminara; Liam Smeeth; Emanuela Taioli; Nic Timpson; Andre G Uitterlinden; Paolo Vineis; Nick Wareham; Deborah M Winn; Ron Zimmern; Muin J Khoury
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 38.330

View more
  64 in total

Review 1.  Genetic susceptibility to lupus: the biological basis of genetic risk found in B cell signaling pathways.

Authors:  Samuel E Vaughn; Leah C Kottyan; Melissa E Munroe; John B Harley
Journal:  J Leukoc Biol       Date:  2012-06-29       Impact factor: 4.962

Review 2.  Comprehensive field synopsis and systematic meta-analyses of genetic association studies in cutaneous melanoma.

Authors:  Foteini Chatzinasiou; Christina M Lill; Katerina Kypreou; Irene Stefanaki; Vasiliki Nicolaou; George Spyrou; Evangelos Evangelou; Johannes T Roehr; Elizabeth Kodela; Andreas Katsambas; Hensin Tsao; John P A Ioannidis; Lars Bertram; Alexander J Stratigos
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2011-06-21       Impact factor: 13.506

3.  Convergence of genome-wide association and candidate gene studies for alcoholism.

Authors:  Emily Olfson; Laura Jean Bierut
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2012-09-14       Impact factor: 3.455

4.  Association of rs11190870 near LBX1 with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis susceptibility in a Han Chinese population.

Authors:  Hua Jiang; Xusheng Qiu; Jin Dai; Huang Yan; Zezhang Zhu; Bangping Qian; Yong Qiu
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-10-21       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 5.  Knowledge integration in cancer: current landscape and future prospects.

Authors:  John P A Ioannidis; Sheri D Schully; Tram Kim Lam; Muin J Khoury
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2012-10-23       Impact factor: 4.254

Review 6.  Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience.

Authors:  Katherine S Button; John P A Ioannidis; Claire Mokrysz; Brian A Nosek; Jonathan Flint; Emma S J Robinson; Marcus R Munafò
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2013-04-10       Impact factor: 34.870

7.  One thing leads to another: the cascade of obligations when researchers report genetic research results to study participants.

Authors:  Fiona Alice Miller; Robin Zoe Hayeems; Li Li; Jessica Peace Bytautas
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2012-02-15       Impact factor: 4.246

Review 8.  The evolution and refinement of traditional risk factors for cardiovascular disease.

Authors:  Emil M deGoma; Joshua W Knowles; Fabio Angeli; Matthew J Budoff; Daniel J Rader
Journal:  Cardiol Rev       Date:  2012 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.644

9.  Laboratory mouse models for the human genome-wide associations.

Authors:  Georgios D Kitsios; Navdeep Tangri; Peter J Castaldi; John P A Ioannidis
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-11-01       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  Building a Science of Individual Differences from fMRI.

Authors:  Julien Dubois; Ralph Adolphs
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2016-04-30       Impact factor: 20.229

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.