PURPOSE: Average survival of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL) is associated with clinical stage at diagnosis, where stage I has a favorable survival prognosis, whereas patients with more advanced stages succumb to their disease within 5 years. Although the majority of patients present with an early-stage CTCL, 15% to 20% of them will inevitably progress. Current state-of-the-art clinical criteria cannot identify individuals with stage I disease who are at risk of progression. The purpose of the current work is to gain novel molecular insight into the pathophysiology of CTCL to be able to identify patients with poor versus favorable prognosis. Our previous work used microarray analysis of skin biopsies from 62 CTCL patients to perform an unsupervised analysis of gene expression, which revealed three distinct transcription profile clusters. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: In the present study, we used reverse transcription-PCR to confirm gene expression levels for a subset of representative genes in each cluster. We also performed a Kaplan-Meier analysis of survival and disease progression based on the 6 years of clinical follow-up. RESULTS: Our reverse transcription-PCR results confirmed the upregulation of representative genes for each cluster, whereas clinical analysis documents that all stage I cases that progressed to stage II and beyond were in poor and intermediate prognosis clusters 1 and 3 and none were in favorable prognosis cluster 2. This analysis also identified certain genes that were preferentially expressed in favorable (e.g., WIF-1) versus poor (e.g., IL-17F) prognosis clusters. CONCLUSION: This work suggests that it may be possible to stratify CTCL patients into low-risk, intermediate-risk, and high-risk groups based on gene expression. Copyright 2010 AACR.
PURPOSE: Average survival of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL) is associated with clinical stage at diagnosis, where stage I has a favorable survival prognosis, whereas patients with more advanced stages succumb to their disease within 5 years. Although the majority of patients present with an early-stage CTCL, 15% to 20% of them will inevitably progress. Current state-of-the-art clinical criteria cannot identify individuals with stage I disease who are at risk of progression. The purpose of the current work is to gain novel molecular insight into the pathophysiology of CTCL to be able to identify patients with poor versus favorable prognosis. Our previous work used microarray analysis of skin biopsies from 62 CTCLpatients to perform an unsupervised analysis of gene expression, which revealed three distinct transcription profile clusters. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: In the present study, we used reverse transcription-PCR to confirm gene expression levels for a subset of representative genes in each cluster. We also performed a Kaplan-Meier analysis of survival and disease progression based on the 6 years of clinical follow-up. RESULTS: Our reverse transcription-PCR results confirmed the upregulation of representative genes for each cluster, whereas clinical analysis documents that all stage I cases that progressed to stage II and beyond were in poor and intermediate prognosis clusters 1 and 3 and none were in favorable prognosis cluster 2. This analysis also identified certain genes that were preferentially expressed in favorable (e.g., WIF-1) versus poor (e.g., IL-17F) prognosis clusters. CONCLUSION: This work suggests that it may be possible to stratify CTCLpatients into low-risk, intermediate-risk, and high-risk groups based on gene expression. Copyright 2010 AACR.
Authors: Lorraine Tracey; Raquel Villuendas; Ana Maria Dotor; Inmaculada Spiteri; Pablo Ortiz; Juan F Garcia; Jose Luis Rodriguez Peralto; Mark Lawler; Miguel A Piris Journal: Blood Date: 2003-04-10 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: Rein Willemze; Elaine S Jaffe; Günter Burg; Lorenzo Cerroni; Emilio Berti; Steven H Swerdlow; Elisabeth Ralfkiaer; Sergio Chimenti; José L Diaz-Perez; Lyn M Duncan; Florent Grange; Nancy Lee Harris; Werner Kempf; Helmut Kerl; Michael Kurrer; Robert Knobler; Nicola Pimpinelli; Christian Sander; Marco Santucci; Wolfram Sterry; Maarten H Vermeer; Janine Wechsler; Sean Whittaker; Chris J L M Meijer Journal: Blood Date: 2005-02-03 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: Jessica Shin; Stefano Monti; Daniel J Aires; Madeleine Duvic; Todd Golub; David A Jones; Thomas S Kupper Journal: Blood Date: 2007-07-16 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: Laszlo Kari; Andrey Loboda; Michael Nebozhyn; Alain H Rook; Eric C Vonderheid; Calen Nichols; Dezso Virok; Celia Chang; Wen-Hwai Horng; James Johnston; Maria Wysocka; Michael K Showe; Louise C Showe Journal: J Exp Med Date: 2003-06-02 Impact factor: 14.307
Authors: Ivan V Litvinov; Michael T Tetzlaff; Elham Rahme; Youssef Habel; David R Risser; Pamela Gangar; Michelle A Jennings; Kevin Pehr; Victor G Prieto; Denis Sasseville; Madeleine Duvic Journal: Cancer Date: 2015-02-27 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Ivan V Litvinov; Michael T Tetzlaff; Philippe Thibault; Pamela Gangar; Linda Moreau; Andrew K Watters; Elena Netchiporouk; Kevin Pehr; Victor G Prieto; Elham Rahme; Nathalie Provost; Martin Gilbert; Denis Sasseville; Madeleine Duvic Journal: Oncoimmunology Date: 2017-03-17 Impact factor: 8.110
Authors: Ivan V Litvinov; Brendan Cordeiro; Yuanshen Huang; Hanieh Zargham; Kevin Pehr; Marc-André Doré; Martin Gilbert; Youwen Zhou; Thomas S Kupper; Denis Sasseville Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2014-05-21 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Ivan V Litvinov; Elena Netchiporouk; Brendan Cordeiro; Marc-André Doré; Linda Moreau; Kevin Pehr; Martin Gilbert; Youwen Zhou; Denis Sasseville; Thomas S Kupper Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2015-03-16 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Thorbjørn Krejsgaard; Ivan V Litvinov; Yang Wang; Lixin Xia; Andreas Willerslev-Olsen; Sergei B Koralov; Katharina L Kopp; Charlotte M Bonefeld; Mariusz A Wasik; Carsten Geisler; Anders Woetmann; Youwen Zhou; Denis Sasseville; Niels Odum Journal: Blood Date: 2013-06-25 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: Ivan V Litvinov; Brendan Cordeiro; Simon Fredholm; Niels Ødum; Hanieh Zargham; Yuanshen Huang; Youwen Zhou; Kevin Pehr; Thomas S Kupper; Anders Woetmann; Denis Sasseville Journal: Cell Cycle Date: 2014 Impact factor: 4.534