OBJECTIVES: To determine the mechanism of intermediate- and high-level echinocandin resistance, resulting from heterozygous and homozygous mutations in GSC1 (FKS1), in both laboratory-generated and clinical isolates of Candida albicans. METHODS: The DNA sequences of the entire open reading frames of GSC1, GSL1 (FKS3) and RHO1, which may contribute to the beta-1,3-glucan synthase of a micafungin-susceptible strain and a resistant clinical isolate, were compared. A spontaneous heterozygous mutant isolated by selection for micafungin resistance, and a panel of laboratory-generated homozygous and heterozygous mutants that possessed combinations of the echinocandin-susceptible and -resistant alleles, or mutants with individual GSC1 alleles deleted, were used to compare levels of echinocandin resistance and inhibition of glucan synthase activity. RESULTS: DNA sequence analysis identified a mutation, S645P, in both alleles of GSC1 from the clinical isolate. GSL1 had two homozygous amino acid changes and five non-synonymous nucleotide polymorphisms due to allelic variation. The predicted amino acid sequence of Rho1p was conserved between strains. Reconstruction of the heterozygous (S645/S645F) and homozygous (S645F/S645F) mutation showed that the homozygous mutation conferred a higher level of micafungin resistance (4 mg/L) than the heterozygous mutation (1 mg/L). Exposure of the heterozygous mutant to micafungin resulted in a loss of heterozygosity. Kinetic analysis of beta-1,3-glucan synthase activity showed that the homozygous and heterozygous mutations gave echinocandin susceptibility profiles that correlated with their MIC values. CONCLUSIONS: A homozygous hot-spot mutation in GSC1, caused by mutation in one allele and then loss of heterozygosity, is required for high-level echinocandin resistance in C. albicans. Both alleles of GSC1 contribute equally and independently to beta-1,3-glucan synthase activity.
OBJECTIVES: To determine the mechanism of intermediate- and high-level echinocandin resistance, resulting from heterozygous and homozygous mutations in GSC1 (FKS1), in both laboratory-generated and clinical isolates of Candida albicans. METHODS: The DNA sequences of the entire open reading frames of GSC1, GSL1 (FKS3) and RHO1, which may contribute to the beta-1,3-glucan synthase of a micafungin-susceptible strain and a resistant clinical isolate, were compared. A spontaneous heterozygous mutant isolated by selection for micafungin resistance, and a panel of laboratory-generated homozygous and heterozygous mutants that possessed combinations of the echinocandin-susceptible and -resistant alleles, or mutants with individual GSC1 alleles deleted, were used to compare levels of echinocandin resistance and inhibition of glucan synthase activity. RESULTS: DNA sequence analysis identified a mutation, S645P, in both alleles of GSC1 from the clinical isolate. GSL1 had two homozygous amino acid changes and five non-synonymous nucleotide polymorphisms due to allelic variation. The predicted amino acid sequence of Rho1p was conserved between strains. Reconstruction of the heterozygous (S645/S645F) and homozygous (S645F/S645F) mutation showed that the homozygous mutation conferred a higher level of micafungin resistance (4 mg/L) than the heterozygous mutation (1 mg/L). Exposure of the heterozygous mutant to micafungin resulted in a loss of heterozygosity. Kinetic analysis of beta-1,3-glucan synthase activity showed that the homozygous and heterozygous mutations gave echinocandin susceptibility profiles that correlated with their MIC values. CONCLUSIONS: A homozygous hot-spot mutation in GSC1, caused by mutation in one allele and then loss of heterozygosity, is required for high-level echinocandin resistance in C. albicans. Both alleles of GSC1 contribute equally and independently to beta-1,3-glucan synthase activity.
Authors: Keunsook K Lee; Donna M Maccallum; Mette D Jacobsen; Louise A Walker; Frank C Odds; Neil A R Gow; Carol A Munro Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2011-10-10 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Santosh K Katiyar; Ana Alastruey-Izquierdo; Kelley R Healey; Michael E Johnson; David S Perlin; Thomas D Edlind Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2012-10-01 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: A Fekkar; E Dannaoui; I Meyer; S Imbert; J Y Brossas; M Uzunov; G Mellon; S Nguyen; E Guiller; E Caumes; V Leblond; D Mazier; M H Fievet; A Datry Journal: Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis Date: 2014-04-09 Impact factor: 3.267
Authors: Jessica K Roberts; Chris Stockmann; Jonathan E Constance; Justin Stiers; Michael G Spigarelli; Robert M Ward; Catherine M T Sherwin Journal: Clin Pharmacokinet Date: 2014-07 Impact factor: 6.447
Authors: M Lackner; M Tscherner; M Schaller; K Kuchler; C Mair; B Sartori; F Istel; M C Arendrup; C Lass-Flörl Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2014-04-14 Impact factor: 5.191