Literature DB >> 20233581

Interference with the p53 family network contributes to the gain of oncogenic function of mutant p53 in hepatocellular carcinoma.

Tobias Schilling1, Astrid Kairat, Gerry Melino, Peter H Krammer, Wolfgang Stremmel, Moshe Oren, Martina Müller.   

Abstract

Whereas the hallmark of wild-type p53 is its tumor suppressor activity, tumor-associated mutant p53 proteins can exert novel anti-apoptotic gain-of-function activities, which confer a selective advantage upon tumor cells harboring such mutations. We investigated the molecular mechanisms of mutant p53 gain-of-function in hepatocellular carcinoma with special emphasis on the interaction of mutant p53 gain-of-function proteins with the p53 family members p63 and p73. Mutant forms of p53, namely the hot-spot mutants p53R143A, p53R175D, p53R175H, p53R248W, and p53R273H, acquire anti-apoptotic gain-of-function in hepatocellular carcinoma by repressing the activity of genes regulating both, the extrinsic apoptosis pathway initiated by ligation of death receptors and the intrinsic/mitochondrial apoptosis pathway. In the presence of mutated p53, the CD95L-CD95 apoptotic pathway is markedly attenuated. This is due to repression of CD95 gene transcription by mutant p53. In addition, these mutants repress the expression of the Bax gene and attenuate mitochondria-mediated apoptosis signaling. Furthermore, and of clinical relevance, these gain-of-function mutants are anti-apoptotic due to their inhibitory interaction with the pro-apoptotic p53 family members TAp63 and TAp73. p53 gain-of-function mutants significantly decrease activation of pro-apoptotic target genes by wild-type p53, TAp63, and TAp73. This contributes to the ability of cancer cells to withstand DNA damage-induced apoptosis. Interference with the interaction of p53 gain-of-function mutants with TAp63 or TAp73 may thus sensitize hepatocellular carcinoma to elimination by therapy. Copyright 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20233581     DOI: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2010.03.082

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biochem Biophys Res Commun        ISSN: 0006-291X            Impact factor:   3.575


  12 in total

Review 1.  Links between mutant p53 and genomic instability.

Authors:  Walter Hanel; Ute M Moll
Journal:  J Cell Biochem       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 4.429

2.  p53 reactivation with induction of massive apoptosis-1 (PRIMA-1) inhibits amyloid aggregation of mutant p53 in cancer cells.

Authors:  Luciana P Rangel; Giulia D S Ferretti; Caroline L Costa; Sarah M M V Andrade; Renato S Carvalho; Danielly C F Costa; Jerson L Silva
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2019-01-02       Impact factor: 5.157

3.  Dipeptide analysis of p53 mutations and evolution of p53 family proteins.

Authors:  Qiang Huang; Long Yu; Arnold J Levine; Ruth Nussinov; Buyong Ma
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  2013-04-10

Review 4.  p53 mutations in cancer.

Authors:  Patricia A J Muller; Karen H Vousden
Journal:  Nat Cell Biol       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 28.824

5.  The p53R172H mutant does not enhance hepatocellular carcinoma development and progression.

Authors:  Leanne G Ahronian; David R Driscoll; David S Klimstra; Brian C Lewis
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-04-17       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 6.  p53 Family and Cellular Stress Responses in Cancer.

Authors:  Johanna Pflaum; Sophie Schlosser; Martina Müller
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2014-10-21       Impact factor: 6.244

7.  Preferential binding of hot spot mutant p53 proteins to supercoiled DNA in vitro and in cells.

Authors:  Marie Brázdová; Lucie Navrátilová; Vlastimil Tichý; Kateřina Němcová; Matej Lexa; Roman Hrstka; Petr Pečinka; Matej Adámik; Borivoj Vojtesek; Emil Paleček; Wolfgang Deppert; Miroslav Fojta
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-03-26       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  p63 is an alternative p53 repressor in melanoma that confers chemoresistance and a poor prognosis.

Authors:  Rubeta N Matin; Anissa Chikh; Stephanie Law Pak Chong; David Mesher; Manuela Graf; Paolo Sanza'; Valentina Senatore; Maria Scatolini; Francesca Moretti; Irene M Leigh; Charlotte M Proby; Antonio Costanzo; Giovanna Chiorino; Rino Cerio; Catherine A Harwood; Daniele Bergamaschi
Journal:  J Exp Med       Date:  2013-02-18       Impact factor: 14.307

9.  Liver-specific expressions of HBx and src in the p53 mutant trigger hepatocarcinogenesis in zebrafish.

Authors:  Jeng-Wei Lu; Wan-Yu Yang; Su-Mei Tsai; Yueh-Min Lin; Pen-Heng Chang; Jim-Ray Chen; Horng-Dar Wang; Jen-Leih Wu; Shiow-Lian Catherine Jin; Chiou-Hwa Yuh
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-10-09       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  Mutant p53 in cancer: new functions and therapeutic opportunities.

Authors:  Patricia A J Muller; Karen H Vousden
Journal:  Cancer Cell       Date:  2014-03-17       Impact factor: 31.743

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.