Pharmacological characterization of cannabinoid receptor activity in the rat-isolated ileum myenteric plexus-longitudinal muscle preparation.

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: Cannabinoid effects on intestinal transit are commonly evaluated in rats. We characterized the cannabinoid receptors mediating the inhibitory effect of 5-(1,1-dimethylheptyl)-2-[5-hydroxy-2-(3-hydroxypropyl)-cyclohexyl]-phenol (CP 55,940), (R)-(+)-[2,3-dihydro-5-methyl-3-(4-morpholinylmethyl)pyrrolo[1,2,3-de]-1,4-benzoxazin-6-yl]-1-naphthalenylmethanone mesylate (WIN 55,212-2), arachidonylethanolamide (AEA) and Delta(9)-tetrahydrocannabinol (Delta(9)-THC) on contractions of the rat ileum myenteric plexus-longitudinal muscle (MPLM) preparation. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: The interaction of each agonist was examined with the CB(1) and CB(2) receptor antagonist rimonabant and SR 144,528 respectively, on contractions elicited by electrical field stimulation (EFS) or exogenous ACh. The interaction of AEA with capsazepine, a TRPV(1) receptor antagonist, was also investigated. KEY
RESULTS: EFS with single and trains of pulses evoked neurogenic ACh-mediated twitch and rebound contractions respectively. The rank order of potency for inhibition was CP 55,940 = WIN 55,212-2 > AEA > Delta(9)-THC and AEA > WIN 55,212-2 =Delta(9)-THC = CP 55,940 respectively. The stereoisomer WIN 55,212-3 was without effect. Rimonabant antagonized the inhibition of the twitches with pK(B) values of around 8.60, but only antagonized rebound contractions induced by WIN 55,212-2, AEA and Delta(9)-THC, with pA(2) values of around 6.80. Rimonabant increased the twitches but inhibited the rebound contractions. Contractions to exogenous ACh were not altered. These observations extended to the guinea pig ileum MPLM. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: The rat MPLM contains CB(1) receptors and at least two non-CB(1)-non-CB(2)-non-TRPV(1) receptors attenuating EFS-evoked ACh-mediated contractions in an EFS frequency-dependent pre-synaptic and stereo-specific manner. Augmentation of the twitches by rimonabant may be through antagonism of an endocannabinoid tone or inverse agonism, whereas inhibition of the rebound contractions involved partial agonism.