AIMS: Probenecid influences transport processes of drugs at several sites in the body and decreases elimination of several quinolones. We sought to explore extent, time course, and mechanism of the interaction between ciprofloxacin and probenecid at renal and nonrenal sites. METHODS: A randomized, two-way crossover study was conducted in 12 healthy volunteers (in part previously published Clin Pharmacol Ther 1995; 58: 532-41). Subjects received 200 mg ciprofloxacin as 30-min intravenous infusion without and with 3 g probenecid divided into five oral doses. Drug concentrations were analysed by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry and high-performance liquid chromatography. Ciprofloxacin and its 2-aminoethylamino-metabolite (M1) in plasma and urine with and without probenecid were modelled simultaneously with WinNonlin. RESULTS: Data are ratio of geometric means (90% confidence intervals). Addition of probenecid reduced the median renal clearance from 23.8 to 8.25 l h(-1)[65% reduction (59, 71), P < 0.01] for ciprofloxacin and from 20.5 to 8.26 l h(-1) (66% reduction (57, 73), P < 0.01] for M1 (estimated by modelling). Probenecid reduced ciprofloxacin nonrenal clearance by 8% (1, 14) (P < 0.08). Pharmacokinetic modelling indicated competitive inhibition of the renal tubular secretion of ciprofloxacin and M1 by probenecid. The affinity for the renal transporter was 4.4 times higher for ciprofloxacin and 3.6 times higher for M1 than for probenecid, based on the molar ratio. Probenecid did not affect volume of distribution of ciprofloxacin or M1, nonrenal clearance or intercompartmental clearance of ciprofloxacin. CONCLUSIONS:Probenecid inhibited the renal tubular secretion of ciprofloxacin and M1, probably by a competitive mechanism and due to reaching >100-fold higher plasma concentrations. Formation of M1, nonrenal clearance and distribution of ciprofloxacin were not affected.
RCT Entities:
AIMS: Probenecid influences transport processes of drugs at several sites in the body and decreases elimination of several quinolones. We sought to explore extent, time course, and mechanism of the interaction between ciprofloxacin and probenecid at renal and nonrenal sites. METHODS: A randomized, two-way crossover study was conducted in 12 healthy volunteers (in part previously published Clin Pharmacol Ther 1995; 58: 532-41). Subjects received 200 mg ciprofloxacin as 30-min intravenous infusion without and with 3 g probenecid divided into five oral doses. Drug concentrations were analysed by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry and high-performance liquid chromatography. Ciprofloxacin and its 2-aminoethylamino-metabolite (M1) in plasma and urine with and without probenecid were modelled simultaneously with WinNonlin. RESULTS: Data are ratio of geometric means (90% confidence intervals). Addition of probenecid reduced the median renal clearance from 23.8 to 8.25 l h(-1)[65% reduction (59, 71), P < 0.01] for ciprofloxacin and from 20.5 to 8.26 l h(-1) (66% reduction (57, 73), P < 0.01] for M1 (estimated by modelling). Probenecid reduced ciprofloxacin nonrenal clearance by 8% (1, 14) (P < 0.08). Pharmacokinetic modelling indicated competitive inhibition of the renal tubular secretion of ciprofloxacin and M1 by probenecid. The affinity for the renal transporter was 4.4 times higher for ciprofloxacin and 3.6 times higher for M1 than for probenecid, based on the molar ratio. Probenecid did not affect volume of distribution of ciprofloxacin or M1, nonrenal clearance or intercompartmental clearance of ciprofloxacin. CONCLUSIONS:Probenecid inhibited the renal tubular secretion of ciprofloxacin and M1, probably by a competitive mechanism and due to reaching >100-fold higher plasma concentrations. Formation of M1, nonrenal clearance and distribution of ciprofloxacin were not affected.
Authors: Birgitta C Burckhardt; Stefan Brai; Sonke Wallis; Wolfgang Krick; Natascha A Wolff; Gerhard Burckhardt Journal: Am J Physiol Renal Physiol Date: 2002-11-12
Authors: P H Vlasses; A M Holbrook; J J Schrogie; J D Rogers; R K Ferguson; W B Abrams Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 1980-05 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Cornelia B Landersdorfer; Jurgen B Bulitta; Carl M J Kirkpatrick; Martina Kinzig; Ulrike Holzgrabe; George L Drusano; Ulrich Stephan; Fritz Sörgel Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2012-08-20 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Yuanyuan Wang; Muh Akbar Bahar; Anouk M E Jansen; Janwillem W H Kocks; Jan-Willem C Alffenaar; Eelko Hak; Bob Wilffert; Sander D Borgsteede Journal: J Antimicrob Chemother Date: 2019-10-01 Impact factor: 5.790
Authors: Mathieu S Bolhuis; Prashant N Panday; Arianna D Pranger; Jos G W Kosterink; Jan-Willem C Alffenaar Journal: Pharmaceutics Date: 2011-11-18 Impact factor: 6.321