Literature DB >> 20233137

Graft patency after off-pump versus on-pump coronary artery surgery in high-risk patients.

Christian H Møller1, Mario J Perko, Jens T Lund, Lars W Andersen, Henning Kelbaek, Jan K Madsen, Christian Gluud, Daniel A Steinbrüchel.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare angiographic graft patency in high-risk patients randomly allocated to off-pump vs. on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG).
DESIGN: From a randomised, single-centre clinical trial including patients undergoing isolated first-time coronary bypass surgery a subgroup of patients were scheduled to 1-year coronary angiographic follow-up. Patients had 3-vessel disease and a EuroSCORE > or =5. We evaluated graft patency using a patency index (percentage of patent grafts out of the total number of grafts in each patient).
RESULTS: One-year angiography was performed in 34 patients undergoing off-pump surgery and 35 patients undergoing on-pump surgery. The mean number of distal anastomoses was 3.38+/-0.65 in the off-pump group versus 3.46+/-0.61 in the on-pump group (NS). The number of patients without graft failure was 22 in the off-pump group and 24 in the on-pump group (NS). The overall patency index was 85% in the off-pump group versus 87% in the on-pump group with a mean difference of -2.1%, 95% confidence interval -12.9 to 8.7 (NS).
CONCLUSIONS: In patients with 3-vessel disease and a high-risk profile we found no statistically significant difference in graft patency between off-pump and on-pump CABG at 1-year coronary angiographic follow-up.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20233137     DOI: 10.3109/14017430903556286

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Scand Cardiovasc J        ISSN: 1401-7431            Impact factor:   1.589


  4 in total

Review 1.  Off-pump versus on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting.

Authors:  Christian H Møller; Daniel A Steinbrüchel
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 2.931

2.  256-slice CT angiographic evaluation of coronary artery bypass grafts: effect of heart rate, heart rate variability and Z-axis location on image quality.

Authors:  Bettina M Gramer; Patricia Diez Martinez; Anne S Chin; Marie-Pierre Sylvestre; Sandra Larrivée; Louis-Mathieu Stevens; Nicolas Noiseux; Gilles Soulez; Ernst J Rummeny; Carl Chartrand-Lefebvre
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-03-17       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  The BYPASS-CTCA Study: the value of Computed Tomography Cardiac Angiography (CTCA) in improving patient-related outcomes in patients with previous bypass operation undergoing invasive coronary angiography: Study Protocol of a Randomised Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Anne-Marie Beirne; Krishnaraj S Rathod; Emily Castle; Mervyn Andiapen; Amy Richards; Anna Bellin; Victoria Hammond; Thomas Godec; James C Moon; Ceri Davies; Christos V Bourantas; Andrew Wragg; Amrita Ahluwalia; Francesca Pugliese; Anthony Mathur; Daniel A Jones
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2021-09

4.  Composite versus conventional coronary artery bypass grafting strategy for the anterolateral territory: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Ariane Drouin; Nicolas Noiseux; Carl Chartrand-Lefebvre; Gilles Soulez; Samer Mansour; Jan-Alexis Tremblay; Fadi Basile; Ignacio Prieto; Louis-Mathieu Stevens
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2013-08-26       Impact factor: 2.279

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.