Literature DB >> 20232326

Platinum-DNA interactions and subsequent cellular processes controlling sensitivity to anticancer platinum complexes.

Saeed Ahmad1.   

Abstract

Platinum-based compounds are widely used as chemotherapeutics for the treatment of a variety of cancers. The anticancer activity of cisplatin and other platinum drugs is believed to arise from their interaction with DNA. Several cellular pathways are activated in response to this interaction, which include recognition by high-mobility group and repair proteins, translesion synthesis by polymerases, and induction of apoptosis. The apoptotic process is regulated by activation of caspases, p53 gene, and several proapoptotic and antiapoptotic proteins. Such cellular processing eventually leads to an inhibition of the replication or transcription machinery of the cell. Deactivation of platinum drugs by thiols, increased nucleotide excision repair of Pt-DNA adducts, decreased mismatch repair, and defective apoptosis result in resistance to platinum therapy. The differences in cytotoxicity of various platinum complexes are attributed to the differential recognition of their adducts by cellular proteins. Cisplatin and oxaliplatin both produce mainly 1,2-GG intrastrand cross-links as major adducts, but oxaliplatin is found to be more active particularly against cisplatin-resistant tumor cells. Mismatch repair and replicative bypass appear to be the processes most likely involved in differentiating the molecular responses to these two agents. This review describes the formation of Pt-DNA adducts, their interaction with cellular components, and biological effects of this interaction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20232326     DOI: 10.1002/cbdv.200800340

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chem Biodivers        ISSN: 1612-1872            Impact factor:   2.408


  45 in total

1.  Tandem repeat variation near the HIC1 (hypermethylated in cancer 1) promoter predicts outcome of oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Satoshi Okazaki; Marta Schirripa; Fotios Loupakis; Shu Cao; Wu Zhang; Dongyun Yang; Yan Ning; Martin D Berger; Yuji Miyamoto; Mitsukuni Suenaga; Syma Iqubal; Afsaneh Barzi; Chiara Cremolini; Alfredo Falcone; Francesca Battaglin; Lisa Salvatore; Beatrice Borelli; Timothy G Helentjaris; Heinz-Josef Lenz
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2017-07-14       Impact factor: 6.860

2.  Co-inhibition of Pol η and ATR sensitizes cisplatin-resistant non-small cell lung cancer cells to cisplatin by impeding DNA damage repair.

Authors:  Xiao-Qin Li; Jin Ren; Ping Chen; Yu-Jiao Chen; Min Wu; Yan Wu; Kang Chen; Jian Li
Journal:  Acta Pharmacol Sin       Date:  2018-05-31       Impact factor: 6.150

3.  TAB3 overexpression promotes cell proliferation in non-small cell lung cancer and mediates chemoresistance to CDDP in A549 cells via the NF-κB pathway.

Authors:  Jie Chen; Jun Gu; Jian Feng; Yifei Liu; Qun Xue; Tingting Ni; Zhiwen Wang; Liangliang Jia; Guoxin Mao; Lili Ji
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2015-10-17

4.  Cisplatin-induced human peripheral blood mononuclear cells' oxidative stress and nephrotoxicity in head and neck cancer patients: the influence of hydrogen peroxide.

Authors:  Júlia C F Quintanilha; Marília B Visacri; Vanessa M Sousa; Larissa B Bastos; Camila O Vaz; João P O Guarnieri; Laís S Amaral; Carina Malaguti; Carmen S P Lima; Anibal E Vercesi; Patricia Moriel
Journal:  Mol Cell Biochem       Date:  2017-08-21       Impact factor: 3.396

Review 5.  Pharmacogenetics research on chemotherapy resistance in colorectal cancer over the last 20 years.

Authors:  Mariusz Panczyk
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-08-07       Impact factor: 5.742

6.  Rigosertib is a more effective radiosensitizer than cisplatin in concurrent chemoradiation treatment of cervical carcinoma, in vitro and in vivo.

Authors:  Lorenzo Agoni; Indranil Basu; Seema Gupta; Alan Alfieri; Angela Gambino; Gary L Goldberg; E Premkumar Reddy; Chandan Guha
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2014-02-11       Impact factor: 7.038

7.  DNA damage response (DDR) pathway engagement in cisplatin radiosensitization of non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Catherine R Sears; Sean A Cooney; Helen Chin-Sinex; Marc S Mendonca; John J Turchi
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2016-03-03

8.  High expression of microRNA-625-3p is associated with poor response to first-line oxaliplatin based treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Mads H Rasmussen; Niels F Jensen; Line S Tarpgaard; Camilla Qvortrup; Maria U Rømer; Jan Stenvang; Tine P Hansen; Lise L Christensen; Jan Lindebjerg; Flemming Hansen; Benny V Jensen; Torben F Hansen; Per Pfeiffer; Nils Brünner; Torben F Ørntoft; Claus L Andersen
Journal:  Mol Oncol       Date:  2013-02-28       Impact factor: 6.603

9.  miR-203 induces oxaliplatin resistance in colorectal cancer cells by negatively regulating ATM kinase.

Authors:  Yunfei Zhou; Guohui Wan; Riccardo Spizzo; Cristina Ivan; Rohit Mathur; Xiaoxiao Hu; Xiangcang Ye; Jia Lu; Fan Fan; Ling Xia; George A Calin; Lee M Ellis; Xiongbin Lu
Journal:  Mol Oncol       Date:  2013-10-08       Impact factor: 6.603

10.  Enhancing tumor cell response to chemotherapy through nanoparticle-mediated codelivery of siRNA and cisplatin prodrug.

Authors:  Xiaoyang Xu; Kun Xie; Xue-Qing Zhang; Eric M Pridgen; Ga Young Park; Danica S Cui; Jinjun Shi; Jun Wu; Philip W Kantoff; Stephen J Lippard; Robert Langer; Graham C Walker; Omid C Farokhzad
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-10-28       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.