Literature DB >> 20232072

The use of pedicled temporal musculoperiosteal flap with or without free calvarial bone graft in maxillary reconstructions.

Ilpo Antti Johannes Kinnunen1, Aleksi Schrey, Juhani Laine, Kalle Aitasalo.   

Abstract

Various techniques have been used to repair maxillary defects. The aim of this study was to evaluate the suitability of pedicled temporal musculoperiosteal flap (PTMF) and free calvarial bone graft for the reconstruction of maxillary defects. In this retrospective series, 34 patients operated on from 1995 to 2006 at Turku University Central Hospital because of defects of maxilla reconstructed using PTMF with or without free calvarial bone graft were evaluated. The diagnosis, the indication for surgery, the location and staging of the tumours, and the type of radiotherapy used were reviewed. The classification of the maxillary defects was performed according to the classification of Brown (Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 40:183-190, 2002) and the success rates of the reconstructions were evaluated. Of the patients, 32 had been operated on due to a malignant tumour, one due to a benign tumour and one due to posttraumatic palatal defect. Preoperative radiotherapy (n = 14), preoperative chemoradiotherapy (n = 2) or postoperative radiotherapy (n = 11) had been used in the tumour group. As a reconstructive method, PTMF had been used with (n = 21) or without (n = 13) free calvarial bone graft. The use of free calvarial bone graft did not have a significant effect on flap survival. At 1-month follow-up, the flap survival in the 32 patients was 71.9%, whereas 28.1% of the patients suffered from partial flap loss, but there was no total flap loss. At 6-month follow-up, the flap survival in 26 patients was 76.9%, whereas 7.7% of the patients suffered from partial flap loss, and there were four (15.4%) total flap losses. If unilateral alveolar maxillectomy had been performed (Brown classification a), at 1-month follow-up, the flap survival was 82.6%, 17.4% of the patients suffered from partial flap loss, and there was no total flap loss. At 6-month follow-up, the flap survival was 89.5%, while 10.5% of the patients suffered from partial flap loss, and there was no total flap loss. The application of PTMF with or without free calvarial bone graft for reconstruction of limited palatal and maxillary defects appears to be feasible.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20232072     DOI: 10.1007/s00405-010-1225-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol        ISSN: 0937-4477            Impact factor:   2.503


  18 in total

1.  The scapular osteofasciocutaneous flap: a 12-year experience.

Authors:  M L Urken; A G Bridger; K B Zur; E M Genden
Journal:  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2001-07

2.  A method for the bony and dental reconstruction of the maxilla in dentate patients.

Authors:  B Hell; A Tischer; E Heissler; J Bier
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 2.789

3.  Reconstruction of maxillectomy and midfacial defects with free tissue transfer.

Authors:  Eric Santamaria; Peter G Cordeiro
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2006-11-01       Impact factor: 3.454

4.  Reconstruction of the left maxilla.

Authors:  H H CAMPBELL
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg (1946)       Date:  1948-01

5.  An algorithm for maxillectomy defect reconstruction.

Authors:  S P Davison; D A Sherris; N B Meland
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 3.325

6.  A comparison of vascularized and nonvascularized bone grafts for reconstruction of mandibular continuity defects.

Authors:  M A Pogrel; S Podlesh; J P Anthony; J Alexander
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 1.895

7.  The temporalis osteomuscular flap versus the free calvarial bone graft. An experimental study in the growing rabbit.

Authors:  D Fasano; V Menoni; C Riberti; P Bacchini
Journal:  J Craniomaxillofac Surg       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 2.078

8.  Surgical reconstruction of maxilla and midface: clinical outcome and factors relating to postoperative complications.

Authors:  Wenko Smolka; Tateyuki Iizuka
Journal:  J Craniomaxillofac Surg       Date:  2005-01-12       Impact factor: 2.078

9.  Bioactive glass hydroxyapatite in fronto-orbital defect reconstruction.

Authors:  Kalle M J Aitasalo; Matti J Peltola
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 4.730

Review 10.  Developments in reconstruction of midface and maxilla.

Authors:  Neal D Futran; Eduardo Mendez
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 41.316

View more
  2 in total

1.  Vascularized bone graft is a better option for the reconstruction of maxillary defects.

Authors:  Masaki Fujioka; Kenji Hayashida; Chikako Murakami
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2013-07-04       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  Comment to Masaki Fujioka et al. to their accepted letter to the editor: vascularized bone graft is a better option for the reconstruction of maxillary defects.

Authors:  Ilpo Kinnunen
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 2.503

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.