PURPOSE: Methods for estimating the excess mortality attributable to ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) should handle VAP as a time-dependent covariate, since the probability of experiencing VAP increases with the time on mechanical ventilation. VAP-attributable mortality (VAP-AM) varies with definitions, case-mix, causative microorganisms, and treatment adequacy. Our objectives here were to compare VAP-AM estimates obtained using a traditional cohort analysis, a multistate progressive disability model, and a matched-cohort analysis; and to compare VAP-AM estimates according to VAP characteristics. METHODS: We used data from 2,873 mechanically ventilated patients in the Outcomerea database. Among these patients from 12 intensive care units, 434 (15.1%) experienced VAP; of the remaining patients, 1,969 (68.5%) were discharged alive and 470 (16.4%) died. With the multistate model, VAP-AM was 8.1% (95% confidence interval [95%CI], 3.1-13.1%) for 120 days' complete observation, compared to 10.4% (5.6-24.5%) using a matched-cohort approach (2,769 patients) with matching on mechanical ventilation duration followed by conditional logistic regression. VAP-AM was higher in surgical patients and patients with intermediate (but not high) Simplified Acute Physiologic Score II values at ICU admission. VAP-AM was significantly influenced by time to VAP but not by resistance of causative microorganisms. Higher Logistic Organ Dysfunction score at VAP onset dramatically increased VAP-AM (to 31.9% in patients with scores above 7). CONCLUSION: A multistate model that appropriately handled VAP as a time-dependent event produced lower VAP-AM values than conditional logistic regression. VAP-AM varied widely with case-mix. Disease severity at VAP onset markedly influenced VAP-AM; this may contribute to the variability of previous estimates.
PURPOSE: Methods for estimating the excess mortality attributable to ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) should handle VAP as a time-dependent covariate, since the probability of experiencing VAP increases with the time on mechanical ventilation. VAP-attributable mortality (VAP-AM) varies with definitions, case-mix, causative microorganisms, and treatment adequacy. Our objectives here were to compare VAP-AM estimates obtained using a traditional cohort analysis, a multistate progressive disability model, and a matched-cohort analysis; and to compare VAP-AM estimates according to VAP characteristics. METHODS: We used data from 2,873 mechanically ventilated patients in the Outcomerea database. Among these patients from 12 intensive care units, 434 (15.1%) experienced VAP; of the remaining patients, 1,969 (68.5%) were discharged alive and 470 (16.4%) died. With the multistate model, VAP-AM was 8.1% (95% confidence interval [95%CI], 3.1-13.1%) for 120 days' complete observation, compared to 10.4% (5.6-24.5%) using a matched-cohort approach (2,769 patients) with matching on mechanical ventilation duration followed by conditional logistic regression. VAP-AM was higher in surgical patients and patients with intermediate (but not high) Simplified Acute Physiologic Score II values at ICU admission. VAP-AM was significantly influenced by time to VAP but not by resistance of causative microorganisms. Higher Logistic Organ Dysfunction score at VAP onset dramatically increased VAP-AM (to 31.9% in patients with scores above 7). CONCLUSION: A multistate model that appropriately handled VAP as a time-dependent event produced lower VAP-AM values than conditional logistic regression. VAP-AM varied widely with case-mix. Disease severity at VAP onset markedly influenced VAP-AM; this may contribute to the variability of previous estimates.
Authors: Juan F Linares; Juan A López; Emilio Camafeita; Juan P Albar; Fernando Rojo; Jose L Martínez Journal: J Bacteriol Date: 2005-02 Impact factor: 3.490
Authors: P Markowicz; M Wolff; K Djedaïni; Y Cohen; J Chastre; C Delclaux; J Merrer; B Herman; B Veber; A Fontaine; D Dreyfuss Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2000-06 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: A Bueno-Cavanillas; M Delgado-Rodríguez; A López-Luque; S Schaffino-Cano; R Gálvez-Vargas Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 1994-01 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: Sujata M Bhavnani; Jeffrey P Hammel; Elizabeth A Lakota; M Courtney Safir; Brian D VanScoy; Yu Nagira; Christopher M Rubino; Nobuo Sato; Tomokazu Koresawa; Kenichiro Kondo; Paul G Ambrose Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2020-09-21 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: S Weiterer; D Störzinger; M Bernhard; K Mayer; C Lass-Flörl; M A Weigand; C Lichtenstern Journal: Anaesthesist Date: 2011-03 Impact factor: 1.041
Authors: Christian van Delden; Thilo Köhler; Françoise Brunner-Ferber; Bruno François; Jean Carlet; Jean-Claude Pechère Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2012-04-20 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Gennaro De Pascale; Serena Fortuna; Mario Tumbarello; Salvatore Lucio Cutuli; MariaSole Vallecoccia; Teresa Spanu; Giuseppe Bello; Luca Montini; Mariano Alberto Pennisi; Pierluigi Navarra; Massimo Antonelli Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2014-11-21 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Samir S Awad; Alejandro H Rodriguez; Yin-Ching Chuang; Zsuszanna Marjanek; Alex J Pareigis; Gilmar Reis; Thomas W L Scheeren; Alejandro S Sánchez; Xin Zhou; Mikaël Saulay; Marc Engelhardt Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2014-04-09 Impact factor: 9.079