BACKGROUND: Global positioning systems (GPS), geographic information systems (GIS), and accelerometers are powerful tools to explain activity within a built environment, yet little integration of these tools has taken place. This study aimed to assess the feasibility of combining GPS, GIS, and accelerometry to understand transport-related physical activity (TPA) in adults. METHODS: Forty adults wore an accelerometer and portable GPS unit over 7 consecutive days and completed a demographics questionnaire and 7-day travel log. Accelerometer and GPS data were extracted for commutes to/from workplace and integrated into a GIS database. GIS maps were generated to visually explore physical activity intensity, GPS speeds and routes traveled. RESULTS: GPS, accelerometer, and survey data were collected for 37 participants. Loss of GPS data was substantial due to a range of methodological issues, such as low battery life, signal drop out, and participant noncompliance. Nonetheless, greater travel distances and significantly higher speeds were observed for motorized trips when compared with TPA. CONCLUSIONS: Pragmatic issues of using GPS monitoring to understand TPA behaviors and methodological recommendations for future research were identified. Although methodologically challenging, the combination of GPS monitoring, accelerometry and GIS technologies holds promise for understanding TPA within the built environment.
BACKGROUND: Global positioning systems (GPS), geographic information systems (GIS), and accelerometers are powerful tools to explain activity within a built environment, yet little integration of these tools has taken place. This study aimed to assess the feasibility of combining GPS, GIS, and accelerometry to understand transport-related physical activity (TPA) in adults. METHODS: Forty adults wore an accelerometer and portable GPS unit over 7 consecutive days and completed a demographics questionnaire and 7-day travel log. Accelerometer and GPS data were extracted for commutes to/from workplace and integrated into a GIS database. GIS maps were generated to visually explore physical activity intensity, GPS speeds and routes traveled. RESULTS: GPS, accelerometer, and survey data were collected for 37 participants. Loss of GPS data was substantial due to a range of methodological issues, such as low battery life, signal drop out, and participant noncompliance. Nonetheless, greater travel distances and significantly higher speeds were observed for motorized trips when compared with TPA. CONCLUSIONS: Pragmatic issues of using GPS monitoring to understand TPA behaviors and methodological recommendations for future research were identified. Although methodologically challenging, the combination of GPS monitoring, accelerometry and GIS technologies holds promise for understanding TPA within the built environment.
Authors: Hannah M Badland; Mitch J Duncan; Melody Oliver; J Scott Duncan; Suzanne Mavoa Journal: Environ Health Prev Med Date: 2010-03-20 Impact factor: 3.674
Authors: Bumjoon Kang; Anne V Moudon; Philip M Hurvitz; Lucas Reichley; Brian E Saelens Journal: Med Sci Sports Exerc Date: 2013-07 Impact factor: 5.411
Authors: D Alex Quistberg; Eric J Howard; Philip M Hurvitz; Anne V Moudon; Beth E Ebel; Frederick P Rivara; Brian E Saelens Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2017-05-01 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Jana A Hirsch; Kari A Moore; Philippa J Clarke; Daniel A Rodriguez; Kelly R Evenson; Shannon J Brines; Melissa A Zagorski; Ana V Diez Roux Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2014-09-18 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Shannon N Zenk; Amy J Schulz; Stephen A Matthews; Angela Odoms-Young; JoEllen Wilbur; Lani Wegrzyn; Kevin Gibbs; Carol Braunschweig; Carmen Stokes Journal: Health Place Date: 2011-05-17 Impact factor: 4.078