Literature DB >> 20231392

Comparative in vitro antimicrobial activities of torezolid (TR-700), the active moiety of a new oxazolidinone, torezolid phosphate (TR-701), determination of tentative disk diffusion interpretive criteria, and quality control ranges.

Steven D Brown1, Maria M Traczewski.   

Abstract

This study assessed the spectrum of activity of torezolid (TR-700), the active moiety of torezolid phosphate (TR-701), and proposes tentative MIC and disk diffusion breakpoints as well as quality control ranges. The in vitro susceptibilities of 1,096 bacterial isolates, representing 23 different species or phenotypic groups, were determined for torezolid, linezolid, cefotaxime, and levofloxacin using Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) broth microdilution MICs, minimum bactericidal concentrations (MBCs), agar dilution, and disk diffusion testing methods. Torezolid was very active against the majority of Gram-positive strains, including methicillin-susceptible and -resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MIC(50) = 0.25 microg/ml, MIC(90) <or= 0.5 microg/ml), coagulase-negative staphylococci (CNS; MIC(50) = 0.25 microg/ml, MIC(90) <or= 0.5 microg/ml), enterococci (MIC(50) and MIC(90) <or= 0.5 microg/ml), and streptococci (MIC(50) and MIC(90) <or= 0.25 microg/ml). Based upon MIC(90)s, torezolid was 4-fold more active than linezolid against S. aureus, coagulase-negative staphylococci, and the enterococci and 8-fold more active than linezolid against the streptococci. With the use of tentative MIC breakpoints of <or=2 microg/ml for susceptibility, torezolid disk diffusion zone diameter breakpoints are proposed using a 20-microg disk. In addition, MIC quality control ranges of torezolid were determined for three CLSI-recognized standard ATCC reference strains.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20231392      PMCID: PMC2863606          DOI: 10.1128/AAC.01569-09

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother        ISSN: 0066-4804            Impact factor:   5.191


  6 in total

1.  In vitro activities of DA-7157 and DA-7218 against Mycobacterium tuberculosis and Nocardia brasiliensis.

Authors:  Lucio Vera-Cabrera; Eva Gonzalez; Adrian Rendon; Jorge Ocampo-Candiani; Oliverio Welsh; Victor M Velazquez-Moreno; Sung Hak Choi; Carmen Molina-Torres
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  Modification of the error-rate bounded classification scheme for use with two MIC break points.

Authors:  M N Brunden; G E Zurenko; B Kapik
Journal:  Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 2.803

Review 3.  Setting and revising antibacterial susceptibility breakpoints.

Authors:  John Turnidge; David L Paterson
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 26.132

4.  Susceptibility tests of anaerobic bacteria: statistical and clinical considerations.

Authors:  C M Metzler; R M DeHaan
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  1974-12       Impact factor: 5.226

5.  In vitro activity of TR-700, the antibacterial moiety of the prodrug TR-701, against linezolid-resistant strains.

Authors:  K J Shaw; S Poppe; R Schaadt; V Brown-Driver; J Finn; C M Pillar; D Shinabarger; G Zurenko
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2008-10-06       Impact factor: 5.191

6.  In vitro activity of TR-700, the active ingredient of the antibacterial prodrug TR-701, a novel oxazolidinone antibacterial agent.

Authors:  Ronda Schaadt; Debora Sweeney; Dean Shinabarger; Gary Zurenko
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2009-06-15       Impact factor: 5.191

  6 in total
  36 in total

1.  Clinical Response of Tedizolid versus Linezolid in Acute Bacterial Skin and Skin Structure Infections by Severity Measure Using a Pooled Analysis from Two Phase 3 Double-Blind Trials.

Authors:  Taylor Sandison; Carisa De Anda; Edward Fang; Anita F Das; Philippe Prokocimer
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2017-04-24       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  Tedizolid phosphate.

Authors:  Dennis J Cada; Kyle Ingram; Danial E Baker
Journal:  Hosp Pharm       Date:  2014-11

3.  Recent Advances in the Rational Design and Optimization of Antibacterial Agents.

Authors:  Jesse A Jones; Kristopher G Virga; Giuseppe Gumina; Kirk E Hevener
Journal:  Medchemcomm       Date:  2016-07-07       Impact factor: 3.597

4.  Comparative In Vivo Efficacies of Tedizolid in Neutropenic versus Immunocompetent Murine Streptococcus pneumoniae Lung Infection Models.

Authors:  Kamilia Abdelraouf; David P Nicolau
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2016-12-27       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  Nonclinical and pharmacokinetic assessments to evaluate the potential of tedizolid and linezolid to affect mitochondrial function.

Authors:  Shawn Flanagan; Edward E McKee; Debaditya Das; Paul M Tulkens; Hiromi Hosako; Jill Fiedler-Kelly; Julie Passarell; Ann Radovsky; Philippe Prokocimer
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2014-10-20       Impact factor: 5.191

6.  In vitro activity and microbiological efficacy of tedizolid (TR-700) against Gram-positive clinical isolates from a phase 2 study of oral tedizolid phosphate (TR-701) in patients with complicated skin and skin structure infections.

Authors:  Philippe Prokocimer; Paul Bien; Carisa Deanda; Chris M Pillar; Ken Bartizal
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2012-06-11       Impact factor: 5.191

7.  Comparative efficacies of human simulated exposures of tedizolid and linezolid against Staphylococcus aureus in the murine thigh infection model.

Authors:  R A Keel; P R Tessier; J L Crandon; D P Nicolau
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2012-06-11       Impact factor: 5.191

8.  Comparative in vitro activities of torezolid (DA-7157) against clinical isolates of aerobic and anaerobic bacteria in South Korea.

Authors:  Jong Hwa Yum; Sung Hak Choi; Dongeun Yong; Yunsop Chong; Weon Bin Im; Dong-Kwon Rhee; Kyungwon Lee
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2010-09-13       Impact factor: 5.191

9.  Lack of neuropathological changes in rats administered tedizolid phosphate for nine months.

Authors:  Michael J Schlosser; Hiromi Hosako; Ann Radovsky; Mark T Butt; Dragomir Draganov; Jenifer Vija; Frederick Oleson
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2014-11-10       Impact factor: 5.191

10.  Comparative pharmacodynamics of the new oxazolidinone tedizolid phosphate and linezolid in a neutropenic murine Staphylococcus aureus pneumonia model.

Authors:  Alexander J Lepak; Karen Marchillo; Solen Pichereau; William A Craig; David R Andes
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2012-09-10       Impact factor: 5.191

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.