OBJECTIVE: The authors investigated the efficacy of a 12-week manualized meta-cognitive therapy group intervention designed to enhance time management, organization, and planning in adults with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). METHOD:Eighty-eight clinically referred adults who met DSM-IV criteria for ADHD according to clinical and structured diagnostic interviews and standardized questionnaires were stratified by ADHD medication use and otherwise randomly assigned to receivemeta-cognitive therapy or supportive psychotherapy in a group modality. Meta-cognitive therapy uses cognitive-behavioral principles and methods to impart skills and strategies in time management, organization, and planning and to target depressogenic and anxiogenic cognitions that undermine effective self-management. The supportive therapy condition controlled for nonspecific aspects of treatment by providing support while avoiding discussion of cognitive-behavioral strategies. Therapeutic response was assessed by an independent (blind) evaluator via structured interview before and after treatment as well as by self-report and collateral informant behavioral ratings. RESULTS: General linear models comparing change from baseline between treatments revealed statistically significant effects for self-report, collateral report, and independent evaluator ratings of DSM-IV inattention symptoms. In dichotomous indices of therapeutic response, a significantly greater proportion of members of the meta-cognitive therapy group demonstrated improvement compared with members of the supportive therapy group. Logistic regression examining group differences in operationally defined response (controlling for baseline ADHD severity) revealed a robust effect of treatment group (odds ratio=5.41; 95% CI=1.77-16.55). CONCLUSIONS:Meta-cognitive therapy yielded significantly greater improvements in dimensional and categorical estimates of severity of ADHD symptoms compared with supportive therapy. These findings support the efficacy of meta-cognitive therapy as a viable psychosocial intervention.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: The authors investigated the efficacy of a 12-week manualized meta-cognitive therapy group intervention designed to enhance time management, organization, and planning in adults with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). METHOD: Eighty-eight clinically referred adults who met DSM-IV criteria for ADHD according to clinical and structured diagnostic interviews and standardized questionnaires were stratified by ADHD medication use and otherwise randomly assigned to receive meta-cognitive therapy or supportive psychotherapy in a group modality. Meta-cognitive therapy uses cognitive-behavioral principles and methods to impart skills and strategies in time management, organization, and planning and to target depressogenic and anxiogenic cognitions that undermine effective self-management. The supportive therapy condition controlled for nonspecific aspects of treatment by providing support while avoiding discussion of cognitive-behavioral strategies. Therapeutic response was assessed by an independent (blind) evaluator via structured interview before and after treatment as well as by self-report and collateral informant behavioral ratings. RESULTS: General linear models comparing change from baseline between treatments revealed statistically significant effects for self-report, collateral report, and independent evaluator ratings of DSM-IV inattention symptoms. In dichotomous indices of therapeutic response, a significantly greater proportion of members of the meta-cognitive therapy group demonstrated improvement compared with members of the supportive therapy group. Logistic regression examining group differences in operationally defined response (controlling for baseline ADHD severity) revealed a robust effect of treatment group (odds ratio=5.41; 95% CI=1.77-16.55). CONCLUSIONS: Meta-cognitive therapy yielded significantly greater improvements in dimensional and categorical estimates of severity of ADHD symptoms compared with supportive therapy. These findings support the efficacy of meta-cognitive therapy as a viable psychosocial intervention.
Authors: Margaret Weiss; Steven A Safren; Mary V Solanto; Lily Hechtman; Anthony L Rostain; J Russell Ramsay; Candice Murray Journal: J Atten Disord Date: 2008-05 Impact factor: 3.256
Authors: M K Shear; J Vander Bilt; P Rucci; J Endicott; B Lydiard; M W Otto; M H Pollack; L Chandler; J Williams; A Ali; D M Frank Journal: Depress Anxiety Date: 2001 Impact factor: 6.505
Authors: Caroline S Stevenson; Stephanie Whitmont; Laurel Bornholt; David Livesey; Richard J Stevenson Journal: Aust N Z J Psychiatry Date: 2002-10 Impact factor: 5.744
Authors: David Michelson; Lenard Adler; Thomas Spencer; Frederick W Reimherr; Scott A West; Albert J Allen; Douglas Kelsey; Joachim Wernicke; Anthony Dietrich; Denái Milton Journal: Biol Psychiatry Date: 2003-01-15 Impact factor: 13.382
Authors: Michael C Meinzer; Jeremy W Pettit; James G Waxmonsky; Elizabeth Gnagy; Brooke S G Molina; William E Pelham Journal: J Abnorm Child Psychol Date: 2016-05
Authors: Stephanie D Smith; Michael J Crowley; Anne Ferrey; Kathleen Ramsey; Bruce E Wexler; James F Leckman; Denis G Sukhodolsky Journal: Psychiatry Res Date: 2019-06-17 Impact factor: 3.222