Literature DB >> 20231080

A comparison between the pregnancy outcome in women both with or without threatened abortion.

Farideh Dadkhah1, Maryam Kashanian, Giuti Eliasi.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the pregnancy outcome in pregnancies with threatened abortion (miscarriage). MATERIAL AND
METHOD: A prospective cohort study was performed on 1000 pregnant women. 500 women (case group), had a history of vaginal bleeding during the first half of pregnancy and the other 500 women (control group), did not have this history. Both groups of women were monitored from 20 weeks of pregnancy up to delivery.
RESULTS: The women of the 2 groups did not have any significant differences according to age, parity or body mass index (BMI). Spontaneous preterm delivery [126 cases (25.2%) vs. 47 cases (9.4%), P=0.001, adj RR=1.4, CI 95%=1.2-1.5], PROM [51 cases (10.2%) vs. 24 cases (4.8%), P=0.02, adj RR=2.1, CI95%=1.2-2.3], placental abruption [20 cases (4%) vs. 7 cases (1.4%) P=0.01, adj RR=1.1, CI 95%=1.01-1.2], were more in the case group. There were no differences between the 2 groups with regard to Preeclampsia, small for gestational age (SGA), and cesarean deliveries. Neonatal weight (in term pregnancies) in the case group was lower than in the control group (3046.4+/-560.8 g vs. 3317.6+/-432 g, P=0.001). There was a significant relationship between the number of bleeding episodes, spontaneous preterm delivery and placental abruption and there was also a significant relationship between the amount of bleeding and placental abruption.
CONCLUSION: Threatened abortion increases the rate of spontaneous preterm delivery, PROM and placental abruption, and decreases the neonatal weight. Therefore threatened abortion indicates a high risk pregnancy and, as such, demands more serious prenatal care. Copyright (c) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20231080     DOI: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2010.02.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Early Hum Dev        ISSN: 0378-3782            Impact factor:   2.079


  7 in total

1.  Association between history of miscarriage and autism spectrum disorder.

Authors:  Ye Yang; Yidong Shen; Jingjing Lin; Si Dai; Xiaozi Lu; Guanglei Xun; Yamin Li; Renrong Wu; Kun Xia; Xuerong Luo; Jingping Zhao; Jianjun Ou
Journal:  Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci       Date:  2022-10-17       Impact factor: 5.760

2.  Does acupuncture have a role in the treatment of threatened miscarriage? Findings from a feasibility randomised trial and semi-structured participant interviews.

Authors:  Debra Betts; Caroline A Smith; Hannah G Dahlen
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2016-10-07       Impact factor: 3.007

3.  A comparison between pregnancy outcome in women in 15 to 19 and 20 to 35 years age group.

Authors:  Seyedeh Zahra Masoumi; Maryam Kashanian; Elaheh Arab; Narges Sheikhansari; Reyhaneh Arab
Journal:  Med J Islam Repub Iran       Date:  2017-12-28

4.  A Bayesian Stepwise Discriminant Model for Predicting Risk Factors of Preterm Premature Rupture of Membranes: A Case-control Study.

Authors:  Li-Xia Zhang; Yang Sun; Hai Zhao; Na Zhu; Xing-De Sun; Xing Jin; Ai-Min Zou; Yang Mi; Ji-Ru Xu
Journal:  Chin Med J (Engl)       Date:  2017-10-20       Impact factor: 2.628

5.  Relationship between threatened miscarriage and gestational diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  Hee Joong Lee; Errol Norwitz; Banghyun Lee
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2018-08-06       Impact factor: 3.007

6.  Sex Hormone Metabolism and Threatened Abortion.

Authors:  Qianhua Xu; Juan Chen; Zhaolian Wei; Theodore R Brandon; David T Zava; Yuenian Eric Shi; Yunxia Cao
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2017-10-23

7.  Maternal coffee intake and the risk of bleeding in early pregnancy: a cross-sectional analysis.

Authors:  Hansol Choi; Seul Koo; Hyun-Young Park
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2020-02-21       Impact factor: 3.007

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.