Literature DB >> 20230459

Predictors of early mortality in patients age 80 and older receiving implantable defibrillators.

Drew Ertel1, Kavita Phatak, Kevin Makati, Marian Holland, Sara Baig, Michael H Kim, Mark Link, Rod Passman.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There are no upper age restrictions for implantable defibrillators (ICDs) but their benefit may be limited in patients > or = 80 years with strong competing risks of early mortality. Risk factors for early (1-year) mortality in ICD recipients > or = 80 years of age have not been established.
METHODS: Two-center retrospective cohort study to assess predictors of one-year mortality in ICD recipients > or = 80 years of age.
RESULTS: Of 2,967 ICDs implanted in the two centers from 1990-2006, 225 (7.6%) patients were > or =80 years of age and followed-up at one of the two centers. Mean age was 83.3 +/- 3.1 years and follow-up time 3.3 +/- 2.6 years. Median survival was 3.6 years (95% confidence interval 2.3-4.9). Multivariate predictors of 1-year mortality included ejection fraction (EF) < or = 20% and the absence of beta-blocker use. Actuarial 1-year mortality of ICD recipients > or = 80 with an EF < or = 20% was 38.2% versus 13.1% in patients 80+ years with an EF > 20% and 10.6% for patients < 80 years with an EF < or = 20% (P < 0.001 for both). There was no significant difference in the risk of appropriate ICD therapy between those patients 80+ years with EF above and below 20%.
CONCLUSION: In general, patients > or = 80 years of age who meet current indications for ICD implantation live sufficiently long to warrant device implantation based on anticipated survival alone. However, those with an EF < or = 20% have a markedly elevated 1-year mortality with no observed increase in appropriate ICD therapy, thus reducing the benefit of device implantation in this population.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20230459     DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2010.02729.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol        ISSN: 0147-8389            Impact factor:   1.976


  6 in total

1.  Changing nature of cardiac interventions in older adults.

Authors:  John A Dodson; Mathew S Maurer
Journal:  Aging health       Date:  2011-04

2.  Clinical and serum-based markers are associated with death within 1 year of de novo implant in primary prevention ICD recipients.

Authors:  Yiyi Zhang; Eliseo Guallar; Elena Blasco-Colmenares; Darshan Dalal; Barbara Butcher; Sanaz Norgard; Fleur V Y Tjong; Zayd Eldadah; Timm Dickfeld; Kenneth A Ellenbogen; Joseph E Marine; Gordon F Tomaselli; Alan Cheng
Journal:  Heart Rhythm       Date:  2014-10-30       Impact factor: 6.343

Review 3.  Arrhythmias in Patients ≥80 Years of Age: Pathophysiology, Management, and Outcomes.

Authors:  Anne B Curtis; Roshan Karki; Alexander Hattoum; Umesh C Sharma
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2018-05-08       Impact factor: 24.094

4.  Predictors for early mortality and arrhythmic events in patients with cardiac resynchronization therapy with defibrillator: A two center cohort study.

Authors:  Simon von Gunten; Dominic A Theuns; Michael Kühne; Tobias Reichlin; Christian Sticherling; Beat Schaer
Journal:  Cardiol J       Date:  2018-11-28       Impact factor: 2.737

5.  What is The Utility of Electrophysiological Study in Elderly Patients with Syncope and Heart Disease?

Authors:  Rumas Aslam; Nicolas Girerd; Beatrice Brembilla-Perrot
Journal:  Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J       Date:  2015-04-01

6.  Geriatric issues in patients with or being considered for implanted cardiac rhythm devices: a case-based review.

Authors:  Michael A Chen
Journal:  J Geriatr Cardiol       Date:  2020-11-28       Impact factor: 3.327

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.