OBJECTIVE: To report the risk factors and natural history of urinary fistula (UF) after partial nephrectomy (PN), as their incidence has been reported to be 3-6% in large series of PN but there are few reports of the risk factors associated with the development of UF after PN, and the natural history of UF in a large group of patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective review of 1118 PN at one tertiary-care institution. Most patients had a drain placed in the perinephric space after surgery. Fifty-two patients were identified as having a UF if they had persistent flank drainage for >14 days after surgery, or presented with evidence of a UF after the drain had been removed. Risk factors for development and the course of the UF are reported. RESULTS: Fifty-two patients developed a UF after PN (4.4%, 95% confidence interval, CI, 3.5-6.1%) The rate of a persistent urine leak (defined as drain fluid consistent with urine for >2 weeks after surgery) was 4.0 (95% CI 2.9-5.3)%. The overall rate of delayed UF presentation was only 0.4 (0.09-0.9)%. Patients who developed a UF had larger tumours (3.5 vs 2.6 cm, P= 0.03), a higher estimated blood loss (400 vs 300 mL, P < 0.001), and longer ischaemia time (50 vs 39 min, P < 0.001) than patients who did not develop a UF. Differences in tumour histology, laterality, multifocality, type of surgery (laparoscopic vs open), and intraoperative collecting system entry were not statistically different in patients who did or did not develop a UF. Patients with tumours of >2.5 cm were twice as likely to develop a UF than patients with tumours of <2.5 cm (P= 0.02). Most patients were managed conservatively with a percutaneous drain until the UF resolved, if they were asymptomatic. Overall, in 36 patients (69%) the fistula resolved with no intervention, while 16 (31%) required intervention. Stenting was the commonest intervention (15%). No patient required re-operative open surgery. CONCLUSION: The rate of development of UF after PN is low. Tumour size, blood loss and ischaemia time were all associated with the development of a UF. In most patients with a urine leak immediately after surgery the UF will resolve with no intervention, and can be managed conservatively with patience, in the absence of clinical symptoms.
OBJECTIVE: To report the risk factors and natural history of urinary fistula (UF) after partial nephrectomy (PN), as their incidence has been reported to be 3-6% in large series of PN but there are few reports of the risk factors associated with the development of UF after PN, and the natural history of UF in a large group of patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective review of 1118 PN at one tertiary-care institution. Most patients had a drain placed in the perinephric space after surgery. Fifty-two patients were identified as having a UF if they had persistent flank drainage for >14 days after surgery, or presented with evidence of a UF after the drain had been removed. Risk factors for development and the course of the UF are reported. RESULTS: Fifty-two patients developed a UF after PN (4.4%, 95% confidence interval, CI, 3.5-6.1%) The rate of a persistent urine leak (defined as drain fluid consistent with urine for >2 weeks after surgery) was 4.0 (95% CI 2.9-5.3)%. The overall rate of delayed UF presentation was only 0.4 (0.09-0.9)%. Patients who developed a UF had larger tumours (3.5 vs 2.6 cm, P= 0.03), a higher estimated blood loss (400 vs 300 mL, P < 0.001), and longer ischaemia time (50 vs 39 min, P < 0.001) than patients who did not develop a UF. Differences in tumour histology, laterality, multifocality, type of surgery (laparoscopic vs open), and intraoperative collecting system entry were not statistically different in patients who did or did not develop a UF. Patients with tumours of >2.5 cm were twice as likely to develop a UF than patients with tumours of <2.5 cm (P= 0.02). Most patients were managed conservatively with a percutaneous drain until the UF resolved, if they were asymptomatic. Overall, in 36 patients (69%) the fistula resolved with no intervention, while 16 (31%) required intervention. Stenting was the commonest intervention (15%). No patient required re-operative open surgery. CONCLUSION: The rate of development of UF after PN is low. Tumour size, blood loss and ischaemia time were all associated with the development of a UF. In most patients with a urine leak immediately after surgery the UF will resolve with no intervention, and can be managed conservatively with patience, in the absence of clinical symptoms.
Authors: William C Huang; Andrew S Levey; Angel M Serio; Mark Snyder; Andrew J Vickers; Ganesh V Raj; Peter T Scardino; Paul Russo Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2006-09 Impact factor: 41.316
Authors: Inderbir S Gill; Louis R Kavoussi; Brian R Lane; Michael L Blute; Denise Babineau; J Roberto Colombo; Igor Frank; Sompol Permpongkosol; Christopher J Weight; Jihad H Kaouk; Michael W Kattan; Andrew C Novick Journal: J Urol Date: 2007-05-11 Impact factor: 7.450
Authors: R Houston Thompson; Matt Kaag; Andrew Vickers; Shilajit Kundu; Melanie Bernstein; William Lowrance; David Galvin; Guido Dalbagni; Karim Touijer; Paul Russo Journal: J Urol Date: 2009-01-16 Impact factor: 7.450
Authors: Jay Simhan; Marc C Smaldone; Kevin J Tsai; Daniel J Canter; Tianyu Li; Alexander Kutikov; Rosalia Viterbo; David Y T Chen; Richard E Greenberg; Robert G Uzzo Journal: Eur Urol Date: 2011-05-25 Impact factor: 20.096
Authors: Phillip M Pierorazio; Jeffrey K Mullins; Ashley E Ross; Elias S Hyams; Alan W Partin; Misop Han; Patrick C Walsh; Edward M Schaeffer; Christian P Pavlovich; Mohamad E Allaf; Trinity J Bivalacqua Journal: BJU Int Date: 2013-07 Impact factor: 5.588
Authors: Jeffrey J Tomaszewski; Marc C Smaldone; Bic Cung; Tianyu Li; Reza Mehrazin; Alexander Kutikov; Daniel J Canter; Rosalia Viterbo; David Y T Chen; Richard E Greenberg; Robert G Uzzo Journal: Urology Date: 2014-06-26 Impact factor: 2.649
Authors: Robert C Minnee; Hendrikus J A N Kimenai; Paul C Verhagen; Jan H von der Thüsen; Roy S Dwarkasing; Jacqueline van de Wetering; Jan N IJzermans Journal: Am J Case Rep Date: 2017-06-30