Elwyn Chomba1, Antoinette Tshefu2, Marie Onyamboko2, Christine Kaseba-Sata1, Janet Moore3, Elizabeth M McClure3, Nancy Moss4, Norman Goco3, Michele Bloch5, Robert L Goldenberg6. 1. University of Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia. 2. Kinshasa School of Public Health, Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of the Congo. 3. Research Triangle Institute, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA. 4. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Rockville, Maryland, USA. 5. National Cancer Institute, Rockville, Maryland, USA. 6. Drexel University College of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To study pregnant women's knowledge, attitudes and behaviors towards tobacco use and secondhand smoke (SHS) exposure, and exposure to advertising for and against tobacco products in Zambia and the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC). DESIGN: Prospective cross-sectional survey between November 2004 and September 2005. SETTING: Antenatal care clinics in Lusaka, Zambia, and Kinshasa, DRC. POPULATION: Pregnant women in Zambia (909) and the DRC (847). METHODS: Research staff administered a structured questionnaire to pregnant women attending antenatal care clinics. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Pregnant women's use of tobacco, exposure to SHS, knowledge of the harms of tobacco and exposure to advertising for and against tobacco products. RESULTS: Only about 10% of pregnant women reported ever having tried cigarettes (6.6% Zambia; 14.1% DRC). However, in the DRC, 41.8% of pregnant women had tried other forms of tobacco, primarily snuff. About 10% of pregnant women and young children were frequently or always exposed to SHS. Pregnant women's knowledge of the hazards of smoking and SHS exposure was extremely limited. About 13% of pregnant women had seen or heard advertising for tobacco products in the last 30 days. CONCLUSIONS: Tobacco use and SHS exposure pose serious threats to the health of women, infants and children. In many African countries, maternal and infant health outcomes are often poor and will likely worsen if maternal tobacco use increases. Our findings suggest that a 'window of opportunity' exists to prevent increased tobacco use and SHS exposure of pregnant women in Zambia and the DRC.
OBJECTIVE: To study pregnant women's knowledge, attitudes and behaviors towards tobacco use and secondhand smoke (SHS) exposure, and exposure to advertising for and against tobacco products in Zambia and the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC). DESIGN: Prospective cross-sectional survey between November 2004 and September 2005. SETTING: Antenatal care clinics in Lusaka, Zambia, and Kinshasa, DRC. POPULATION: Pregnant women in Zambia (909) and the DRC (847). METHODS: Research staff administered a structured questionnaire to pregnant women attending antenatal care clinics. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Pregnant women's use of tobacco, exposure to SHS, knowledge of the harms of tobacco and exposure to advertising for and against tobacco products. RESULTS: Only about 10% of pregnant women reported ever having tried cigarettes (6.6% Zambia; 14.1% DRC). However, in the DRC, 41.8% of pregnant women had tried other forms of tobacco, primarily snuff. About 10% of pregnant women and young children were frequently or always exposed to SHS. Pregnant women's knowledge of the hazards of smoking and SHS exposure was extremely limited. About 13% of pregnant women had seen or heard advertising for tobacco products in the last 30 days. CONCLUSIONS: Tobacco use and SHS exposure pose serious threats to the health of women, infants and children. In many African countries, maternal and infant health outcomes are often poor and will likely worsen if maternal tobacco use increases. Our findings suggest that a 'window of opportunity' exists to prevent increased tobacco use and SHS exposure of pregnant women in Zambia and the DRC.
Authors: David Hammond; Geoffrey T Fong; Ron Borland; K Michael Cummings; Ann McNeill; Pete Driezen Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2007-03 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: Anne Berit Petersen; Lisa M Thompson; Gezahegn Bekele Dadi; Alemu Tolcha; Janine K Cataldo Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2016-08-31 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Catherine Chamberlain; Alison O'Mara-Eves; Sandy Oliver; Jenny R Caird; Susan M Perlen; Sandra J Eades; James Thomas Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2013-10-23
Authors: Shangfeng Tang; Ghose Bishwajit; Tegene Regassa Luba; Sanni Yaya Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2018-06-11 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Anne Berit Petersen; Lisa M Thompson; Gezahegn Bekele Dadi; Alemu Tolcha; Janine K Cataldo Journal: BMC Womens Health Date: 2018-09-24 Impact factor: 2.809