BACKGROUND: Poor muscle strength is a major public health concern in older persons, predisposing to functional limitations, increased fall risk, and higher mortality. Understanding risk factors for muscle strength decline may offer opportunities for prevention and treatment. One of the possible causes of muscle strength decline is imbalance between catabolic and anabolic signaling. This study aims to examine whether high levels of multiple catabolic and low levels of multiple anabolic biomarkers predict accelerated decline of muscle strength. METHODS: In a representative sample of 716 men and women aged >or=65 years in the InCHIANTI study we measured C-reactive protein, interleukin-6 (IL-6), IL-1 receptor antagonist (IL-1RA), tumor necrosis factor-alpha receptor 1 as well as dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate (DHEA-S), insulin-like growth factor-1, and bioavailable testosterone. Biomarker values were divided into tertiles and the numbers of catabolic/anabolic biomarkers in the highest/lowest tertile were calculated. Hand-grip strength was measured at baseline and 3- and 6-year follow up. RESULTS: In adjusted linear mixed models, higher concentration of IL-6 (p = 0.02) and IL-1RA (p = 0.04) as well as lower levels of DHEA-S (p = 0.01) predicted muscle strength decline. After combining all inflammatory markers, the rate of decline in grip strength was progressively greater with the increasing number of dysregulated catabolic biomarkers (p = 0.01). No effect on accelerated muscle strength decline was seen according to number of dysregulated anabolic hormones. CONCLUSIONS: Having multiple elevated catabolic biomarkers is a better predictor of muscle strength decline than a single biomarker alone, suggesting that a catabolic dysregulation is at the core of the mechanism leading to muscle strength decline with aging.
BACKGROUND: Poor muscle strength is a major public health concern in older persons, predisposing to functional limitations, increased fall risk, and higher mortality. Understanding risk factors for muscle strength decline may offer opportunities for prevention and treatment. One of the possible causes of muscle strength decline is imbalance between catabolic and anabolic signaling. This study aims to examine whether high levels of multiple catabolic and low levels of multiple anabolic biomarkers predict accelerated decline of muscle strength. METHODS: In a representative sample of 716 men and women aged >or=65 years in the InCHIANTI study we measured C-reactive protein, interleukin-6 (IL-6), IL-1 receptor antagonist (IL-1RA), tumornecrosis factor-alpha receptor 1 as well as dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate (DHEA-S), insulin-like growth factor-1, and bioavailable testosterone. Biomarker values were divided into tertiles and the numbers of catabolic/anabolic biomarkers in the highest/lowest tertile were calculated. Hand-grip strength was measured at baseline and 3- and 6-year follow up. RESULTS: In adjusted linear mixed models, higher concentration of IL-6 (p = 0.02) and IL-1RA (p = 0.04) as well as lower levels of DHEA-S (p = 0.01) predicted muscle strength decline. After combining all inflammatory markers, the rate of decline in grip strength was progressively greater with the increasing number of dysregulated catabolic biomarkers (p = 0.01). No effect on accelerated muscle strength decline was seen according to number of dysregulated anabolic hormones. CONCLUSIONS: Having multiple elevated catabolic biomarkers is a better predictor of muscle strength decline than a single biomarker alone, suggesting that a catabolic dysregulation is at the core of the mechanism leading to muscle strength decline with aging.
Authors: Nicholas J Wareham; Rupert W Jakes; Kirsten L Rennie; Jo Mitchell; Susie Hennings; Nicholas E Day Journal: Int J Epidemiol Date: 2002-02 Impact factor: 7.196
Authors: David B Reuben; Anna I Cheh; Tamara B Harris; Luigi Ferrucci; John W Rowe; Russell P Tracy; Teresa E Seeman Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2002-04 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: T Rantanen; T Harris; S G Leveille; M Visser; D Foley; K Masaki; J M Guralnik Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2000-03 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: L Ferrucci; S Bandinelli; E Benvenuti; A Di Iorio; C Macchi; T B Harris; J M Guralnik Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2000-12 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Susan A Everson-Rose; Misti Paudel; Brent C Taylor; Tien Dam; Peggy Mannen Cawthon; Erin Leblanc; Elsa S Strotmeyer; Jane A Cauley; Marcia L Stefanick; Elizabeth Barrett-Connor; Kristine E Ensrud Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2011-08-01 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Marcello Maggio; Gian Paolo Ceda; Fulvio Lauretani; Stefania Bandinelli; Anna Maria Corsi; Francesco Giallauria; Jack M Guralnik; Giovanni Zuliani; Chiara Cattabiani; Stefano Parrino; Fabrizio Ablondi; Elisabetta Dall'aglio; Graziano Ceresini; Shehzad Basaria; Luigi Ferrucci Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2011-01-14 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: Jatupol Kositsawat; Chia-Ling Kuo; Lisa C Barry; David Melzer; Stefania Bandinelli; Luigi Ferrucci; Rong Wu; George A Kuchel Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2020-05-22 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: Francesca De Vita; Fulvio Lauretani; Juergen Bauer; Ivan Bautmans; Michelle Shardell; Antonio Cherubini; Giuliana Bondi; Giovanni Zuliani; Stefania Bandinelli; Mario Pedrazzoni; Elisabetta Dall'Aglio; Gian Paolo Ceda; Marcello Maggio Journal: Age (Dordr) Date: 2014-08-03