Literature DB >> 20230231

How to reduce the impact of "low-risk patients" following a bioterrorist incident: lessons from SARS, anthrax, and pneumonic plague.

G James Rubin1, Petra Dickmann.   

Abstract

A bioterrorist attack may result in a large number of people who have not been exposed coming to medical facilities in search of treatment or reassurance. In this article, we review evidence from 3 previous biological incidents that are analogous to a bioterrorist attack in order to gauge the likely incidence of such "low-risk patients" and to identify possible strategies for coping with this phenomenon. Evidence from the anthrax attacks in the United States suggested that a surge of low-risk patients is by no means inevitable. Data from the SARS outbreak illustrated that if hospitals are seen as sources of contagion, many patients with non-bioterrorism-related healthcare needs may delay seeking help. Finally, the events surrounding the pneumonic plague outbreak of 1994 in Surat, India, highlighted the need for the public to be kept adequately informed about an incident. Although it is impossible to say what the likely incidence of low-risk patients will be during a future bioterrorist incident, several strategies may help to reduce it and to safeguard the well-being of the low-risk patients themselves. These strategies include providing clear information about who should and should not attend hospital; using telephone services to provide more detailed information and initial screening; employing rapid triage at hospital entrances, based, where possible, on exposure history and objective signs of illness; and following up by telephone those judged to be at low risk.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20230231     DOI: 10.1089/bsp.2009.0059

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biosecur Bioterror        ISSN: 1538-7135


  5 in total

1.  Reassuring and managing patients with concerns about swine flu: qualitative interviews with callers to NHS Direct.

Authors:  G James Rubin; Richard Amlôt; Holly Carter; Shirley Large; Simon Wessely; Lisa Page
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2010-08-02       Impact factor: 3.295

2.  Public health controversies: common characteristics.

Authors:  Rajan R Patil
Journal:  J Glob Infect Dis       Date:  2011-01

3.  Mass Casualty Decontamination Guidance and Psychosocial Aspects of CBRN Incident Management: A Review and Synthesis.

Authors:  Holly Carter; Richard Amlôt
Journal:  PLoS Curr       Date:  2016-09-27

4.  Medicine-related beliefs predict attribution of symptoms to a sham medicine: A prospective study.

Authors:  Rebecca K Webster; John Weinman; G James Rubin
Journal:  Br J Health Psychol       Date:  2018-02-05

5.  Public responses to the Salisbury Novichok incident: a cross-sectional survey of anxiety, anger, uncertainty, perceived risk and avoidance behaviour in the local community.

Authors:  G James Rubin; Rebecca Webster; Richard Amlot; Holly Carter; Dale Weston; Simon Wessely
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-09-25       Impact factor: 2.692

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.