Literature DB >> 20229867

Investigation of the effects of treatment planning variables in small animal radiotherapy dose distributions.

Amy R Motomura1, Magdalena Bazalova, Hu Zhou, Paul J Keall, Edward E Graves.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Methods used for small animal radiation treatment have yet to achieve the same dose targeting as in clinical radiation therapy. Toward understanding how to better plan small animal radiation using a system recently developed for this purpose, the authors characterized dose distributions produced from conformal radiotherapy of small animals in a microCT scanner equipped with a variable-aperture collimator.
METHODS: Dose distributions delivered to a cylindrical solid water phantom were simulated using a Monte Carlo algorithm. Phase-space files for 120 kVp x-ray beams and collimator widths of 1-10 mm at isocenter were generated using BEAMnrc software, and dose distributions for evenly spaced beams numbered from 5 to 80 were generated in DOSXYZnrc for a variety of targets, including centered spherical targets in a range of sizes, spherical targets offset from centered by various distances, and various ellipsoidal targets. Dose distributions were analyzed using dose volume histograms. The dose delivered to a mouse bearing a spontaneous lung tumor was also simulated, and dose volume histograms were generated for the tumor, heart, left lung, right lung, and spinal cord.
RESULTS: Results indicated that for centered, symmetric targets, the number of beams required to achieve a smooth dose volume histogram decreased with increased target size. Dose distributions for noncentered, symmetric targets did not exhibit any significant loss of conformality with increasing offset from the phantom center, indicating sufficient beam penetration through the phantom for targeting superficial targets from all angles. Even with variable collimator widths, targeting of asymmetric targets was found to have less conformality than that of spherical targets. Irradiation of a mouse lung tumor with multiple beam widths was found to effectively deliver dose to the tumor volume while minimizing dose to other critical structures.
CONCLUSIONS: Overall, this method of generating and analyzing dose distributions provides a quantitative method for developing practical guidelines for small animal radiotherapy treatment planning. Future work should address methods to improve conformality in asymmetric targets.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20229867      PMCID: PMC2816985          DOI: 10.1118/1.3276738

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  21 in total

1.  Progress toward a microradiation therapy small animal conformal irradiator.

Authors:  Strahinja Stojadinovic; Daniel A Low; Milos Vicic; Sasa Mutic; Joseph O Deasy; Andrew J Hope; Parag J Parikh; Perry W Grigsby
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  The small-animal radiation research platform (SARRP): dosimetry of a focused lens system.

Authors:  Hua Deng; Christopher W Kennedy; Elwood Armour; Erik Tryggestad; Eric Ford; Todd McNutt; Licai Jiang; John Wong
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2007-04-26       Impact factor: 3.609

3.  Design and evaluation of a variable aperture collimator for conformal radiotherapy of small animals using a microCT scanner.

Authors:  Edward E Graves; Hu Zhou; Raja Chatterjee; Paul J Keall; Sanjiv Sam Gambhir; Christopher H Contag; Arthur L Boyer
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Limitations in the determination of total filtration of x-ray tube assemblies.

Authors:  H D Nagel
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  1988-02       Impact factor: 3.609

5.  Significant reduction of normal tissue dose by proton radiotherapy compared with three-dimensional conformal or intensity-modulated radiation therapy in Stage I or Stage III non-small-cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Joe Y Chang; Xiaodong Zhang; Xiaochun Wang; Yixiu Kang; Beverly Riley; Stephen Bilton; Radhe Mohan; Ritsuko Komaki; James D Cox
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2006-05-06       Impact factor: 7.038

6.  Complication probability as assessed from dose-volume histograms.

Authors:  J T Lyman
Journal:  Radiat Res Suppl       Date:  1985

7.  RT_Image: an open-source tool for investigating PET in radiation oncology.

Authors:  Edward E Graves; Andrew Quon; Billy W Loo
Journal:  Technol Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2007-04

8.  Optimal number of beams for stereotactic body radiotherapy of lung and liver lesions.

Authors:  Ruiguo Liu; John M Buatti; Terese L Howes; John Dill; Joseph M Modrick; Sanford L Meeks
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2006-08-14       Impact factor: 7.038

9.  Partial volume rat lung irradiation: the protective/mitigating effects of Eukarion-189, a superoxide dismutase-catalase mimetic.

Authors:  Aimée R Langan; Mohammed A Khan; Ivan W T Yeung; Jake Van Dyk; Richard P Hill
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2006-05-03       Impact factor: 6.280

10.  Progression of renal cell carcinoma is inhibited by genistein and radiation in an orthotopic model.

Authors:  Gilda G Hillman; Yu Wang; Mingxin Che; Julian J Raffoul; Mark Yudelev; Omer Kucuk; Fazlul H Sarkar
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2007-01-09       Impact factor: 4.430

View more
  3 in total

1.  Modality comparison for small animal radiotherapy: a simulation study.

Authors:  Magdalena Bazalova; Geoff Nelson; John M Noll; Edward E Graves
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy Delivery in a Genetically Engineered Mouse Model of Lung Cancer.

Authors:  Shisuo Du; Virginia Lockamy; Lin Zhou; Christine Xue; Justin LeBlanc; Shonna Glenn; Gaurav Shukla; Yan Yu; Adam P Dicker; Dennis B Leeper; You Lu; Bo Lu
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2016-07-21       Impact factor: 7.038

3.  High throughput film dosimetry in homogeneous and heterogeneous media for a small animal irradiator.

Authors:  L Wack; W Ngwa; E Tryggestad; P Tsiamas; R Berbeco; S K Ng; J Hesser; P Zygmanski
Journal:  Phys Med       Date:  2013-03-17       Impact factor: 2.685

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.