Literature DB >> 20229402

Community members as recruiters of human subjects: ethical considerations.

Christian Simon1, Maghboeba Mosavel.   

Abstract

Few studies have considered in detail the ethical issues surrounding research in which investigators ask community members to engage in research subject recruitment within their own communities. Peer-driven recruitment (PDR) and its variants are useful for accessing and including certain populations in research, but also have the potential to undermine the ethical and scientific integrity of community-based research. This paper examines the ethical implications of utilizing community members as recruiters of human subjects in the context of PDR, as well as the authors' experience with a variant of PDR in a research project in South Africa. The importance of situating PDR in a comprehensive community engagement process that is responsive to the constraints of science and local needs and interests is emphasized. The paper will have relevance to bioethicists, health researchers, and research regulators concerned about the appropriate use of peer-driven recruitment strategies in health research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20229402      PMCID: PMC3139466          DOI: 10.1080/15265160903585578

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Bioeth        ISSN: 1526-5161            Impact factor:   11.229


  14 in total

1.  Taking names: the ethics of indirect recruitment in research on sexual networks.

Authors:  L H Margolis
Journal:  J Law Med Ethics       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 1.718

2.  Ethical challenges in the design and conduct of locally relevant international health research.

Authors:  Christian Simon; Maghboeba Mosavel; Debbie van Stade
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2007-02-26       Impact factor: 4.634

3.  Key conceptual issues in the forging of "culturally competent" community health initiatives: a South African example.

Authors:  Christian Simon; Maghboeba Mosavel
Journal:  Camb Q Healthc Ethics       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 1.284

4.  Making consent more informed: preliminary results from a multiple-choice test among probation-referred marijuana users entering a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Daniel B Rounsaville; Karen Hunkele; Caroline J Easton; Charla Nich; Kathleen M Carroll
Journal:  J Am Acad Psychiatry Law       Date:  2008

5.  Trends in cervical cancer mortality in South Africa.

Authors:  R S Bailie; C E Selvey; D Bourne; D Bradshaw
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 7.196

6.  Reaching hidden populations of drug users by privileged access interviewers: methodological and practical issues.

Authors:  P Griffiths; M Gossop; B Powis; J Strang
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 6.526

7.  Implementation and analysis of respondent driven sampling: lessons learned from the field.

Authors:  Abu S Abdul-Quader; Douglas D Heckathorn; Keith Sabin; Tobi Saidel
Journal:  J Urban Health       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 3.671

Review 8.  Respondent-driven sampling in participatory research contexts: participant-driven recruitment.

Authors:  Jennifer S Tiffany
Journal:  J Urban Health       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 3.671

9.  Incorporating a quiz into informed consent processes: qualitative study of participants' reactions.

Authors:  Sassy Molyneux; Caroline Gikonyo; Vicki Marsh; Philip Bejon
Journal:  Malar J       Date:  2007-11-10       Impact factor: 2.979

10.  Grand challenges in global health: community engagement in research in developing countries.

Authors:  Paulina O Tindana; Jerome A Singh; C Shawn Tracy; Ross E G Upshur; Abdallah S Daar; Peter A Singer; Janet Frohlich; James V Lavery
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 11.069

View more
  24 in total

1.  Community researchers conducting health disparities research: Ethical and other insights from fieldwork journaling.

Authors:  Maghboeba Mosavel; Rashid Ahmed; Doria Daniels; Christian Simon
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2011-05-30       Impact factor: 4.634

2.  Commentary 1: How Should Community Members be Paid when they Go Off Script?

Authors:  Stuart Rennie
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 1.742

3.  A qualitative analysis of peer recruitment pressures in respondent driven sampling: Are risks above the ethical limit?

Authors:  Heather I Mosher; Gayatri Moorthi; JiangHong Li; Margaret R Weeks
Journal:  Int J Drug Policy       Date:  2015-06-07

4.  Challenges and potential solutions to meeting accrual goals in a Phase II chemoprevention trial for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Nagi Kumar; Theresa Crocker; Tiffany Smith; Julio Pow-Sang; Philippe E Spiess; Kathleen Egan; Gwen Quinn; Michael Schell; Said Sebti; Aslam Kazi; Tian Chuang; Raoul Salup; Mohamed Helal; Gregory Zagaja; Edouard Trabulsi; Jerry McLarty; Tajammul Fazili; Christopher R Williams; Fred Schreiber; Joel Slaton; J Kyle Anderson
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2011-11-11       Impact factor: 2.226

5.  Misbehaviors of front-line research personnel and the integrity of community-based research.

Authors:  Gala True; Leslie B Alexander; Kenneth A Richman
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 1.742

Review 6.  Considerations for employing intersectionality in qualitative health research.

Authors:  Jasmine A Abrams; Ariella Tabaac; Sarah Jung; Nicole M Else-Quest
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2020-06-16       Impact factor: 4.634

7.  Supporting the role of community members employed as research staff: Perspectives of community researchers working in addiction research.

Authors:  Gala True; Leslie B Alexander; Celia B Fisher
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2017-06-20       Impact factor: 4.634

8.  Response to open peer commentaries on "Community members as recruiters of human subjects: ethical considerations".

Authors:  Christian Simon; Maghboeba Mosavel
Journal:  Am J Bioeth       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 11.229

9.  Participant and staff experiences in a peer-delivered HIV intervention with injection drug users.

Authors:  Kristin M Kostick; Margaret Weeks; Heather Mosher
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 1.742

10.  Community health workers support community-based participatory research ethics: lessons learned along the research-to-practice-to-community continuum.

Authors:  Selina A Smith; Daniel S Blumenthal
Journal:  J Health Care Poor Underserved       Date:  2012-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.