OBJECT: The anterior commissure is a critical interhemispheric pathway in animals, yet its connections in humans are not clearly understood. Its distribution has shown to vary greatly between species, and it is thought that in humans it may convey axons from a larger territory than previously thought. The aim was to use an anatomical mapping tool to look at the anterior commissure fibres and to compare the distribution findings with published anatomical understanding. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two different diffusion-weighted imaging data sets were acquired from eight healthy subjects using a 3 Tesla MR scanner with 32 gradient directions. Diffusion tensor imaging tractography was performed, and the anterior commissure fibres were selected using three-dimensional regions of interest. Distribution of the fibres was observed by means of registration with T2-weighted images. The fibre field similarity maps were produced for five of the eight subjects by comparing each subject's fibres to the combined map of the five data sets. RESULTS: Fibres were shown to lead into the temporal lobe and towards the orbitofrontal cortex in the majority of subjects. Fibres were also distributed to the parietal or occipital lobes in all five subjects in whom the anterior commissure was large enough for interhemispheric fibres to be tracked through. The fibre field similarity maps highlighted areas where the local distances of fibre tracts were displayed for each subject compared to the combined bundle map. CONCLUSION: The anterior commissure may play a more important role in interhemispheric communication than currently presumed by conveying axons from a wider territory, and the fibre field similarity maps give a novel approach to quantifying and visualising characteristics of fibre tracts.
OBJECT: The anterior commissure is a critical interhemispheric pathway in animals, yet its connections in humans are not clearly understood. Its distribution has shown to vary greatly between species, and it is thought that in humans it may convey axons from a larger territory than previously thought. The aim was to use an anatomical mapping tool to look at the anterior commissure fibres and to compare the distribution findings with published anatomical understanding. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two different diffusion-weighted imaging data sets were acquired from eight healthy subjects using a 3 Tesla MR scanner with 32 gradient directions. Diffusion tensor imaging tractography was performed, and the anterior commissure fibres were selected using three-dimensional regions of interest. Distribution of the fibres was observed by means of registration with T2-weighted images. The fibre field similarity maps were produced for five of the eight subjects by comparing each subject's fibres to the combined map of the five data sets. RESULTS: Fibres were shown to lead into the temporal lobe and towards the orbitofrontal cortex in the majority of subjects. Fibres were also distributed to the parietal or occipital lobes in all five subjects in whom the anterior commissure was large enough for interhemispheric fibres to be tracked through. The fibre field similarity maps highlighted areas where the local distances of fibre tracts were displayed for each subject compared to the combined bundle map. CONCLUSION: The anterior commissure may play a more important role in interhemispheric communication than currently presumed by conveying axons from a wider territory, and the fibre field similarity maps give a novel approach to quantifying and visualising characteristics of fibre tracts.
Authors: Qian Dong; Robert C Welsh; Thomas L Chenevert; Ruth C Carlos; Pia Maly-Sundgren; Diana M Gomez-Hassan; Suresh K Mukherji Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2004-01 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Raisa Z Freidlin; Evren Ozarslan; Michal E Komlosh; Lin-Ching Chang; Cheng Guan Koay; Derek K Jones; Peter J Basser Journal: IEEE Trans Med Imaging Date: 2007-11 Impact factor: 10.048
Authors: J R Meyer; A Gutierrez; B Mock; D Hebron; J M Prager; M T Gorey; D Homer Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2000 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: James M Johnston; S Neil Vaishnavi; Matthew D Smyth; Dongyang Zhang; Biyu J He; John M Zempel; Joshua S Shimony; Abraham Z Snyder; Marcus E Raichle Journal: J Neurosci Date: 2008-06-18 Impact factor: 6.167
Authors: Jessica A Collins; Victor Montal; Daisy Hochberg; Megan Quimby; Maria Luisa Mandelli; Nikos Makris; William W Seeley; Maria Luisa Gorno-Tempini; Bradford C Dickerson Journal: Brain Date: 2016-12-31 Impact factor: 13.501
Authors: Gemma B Northam; Frédérique Liégeois; Jacques-Donald Tournier; Louise J Croft; Paul N Johns; Wui K Chong; John S Wyatt; Torsten Baldeweg Journal: Brain Date: 2012-11-11 Impact factor: 13.501
Authors: Trevor C Wu; Elisabeth A Wilde; Erin D Bigler; Xiaoqi Li; Tricia L Merkley; Ragini Yallampalli; Stephen R McCauley; Kathleen P Schnelle; Ana C Vasquez; Zili Chu; Gerri Hanten; Jill V Hunter; Harvey S Levin Journal: Dev Neurosci Date: 2010-10-14 Impact factor: 2.984
Authors: Eva Jennische; Charlotta E Eriksson; Stefan Lange; Edward Trybala; Tomas Bergström Journal: J Neurovirol Date: 2015-01-21 Impact factor: 2.643
Authors: Kailyn A Bradley; Jenifer Juranek; Anna Romanowska-Pawliczek; H Julia Hannay; Paul T Cirino; Maureen Dennis; Larry A Kramer; Jack M Fletcher Journal: Brain Connect Date: 2016-01-22
Authors: Zora Kikinis; Jennifer Fitzsimmons; Chandler Dunn; Mai-Anh Vu; Nikos Makris; Sylvain Bouix; Jill M Goldstein; Raquelle I Mesholam-Gately; Tracey Petryshen; Elisabetta C Del Re; Joanne Wojcik; Larry J Seidman; Marek Kubicki Journal: Schizophr Res Date: 2015-02-07 Impact factor: 4.939