Literature DB >> 2022769

An in vivo and in vitro study of the loss of plasticizer from soft polymer-gel materials.

B S Graham1, D W Jones, E J Sutow.   

Abstract

Polymer-gel materials used as short-term denture soft linings are blended with plasticizers to lower the glass transition temperature (Tg). A lower Tg allows for greater polymer chain mobility, thus producing a more flexible material. The present work evaluated the loss of plasticizers due to leaching both in vivo and in vitro. Two commercial denture soft-lining materials (A and B) were tested. These were both poly(ethyl methacrylate) polymers, blended with alcohol and phthalate esters. A clinical study was conducted in which patients wore, sequentially, dentures bearing (on separate occasions) each of the two soft-polymer lining materials. The two materials A and B were randomly assigned for each of ten patients and were worn for 14 and 30 days, respectively. With one exception, patients wore dentures with both lining materials, for a total of 19 clinical evaluations. The plasticizer loss occurring during the clinical trial was determined by GC analysis from the initial and terminal day sampling of plasticizer content of the soft polymer-gel materials. The results of this analysis were compared with results obtained from an in vitro leachability study by use of sink conditions in water at 37 degrees C for the same two commercial soft polymers conducted over the same time periods of 14 and 30 days. The results indicated that a higher loss of plasticizer occurred in vivo, compared with the in vitro tests for 17 of the 19 clinical evaluations. The average plasticizer lost in vivo from material A at 14 days was 122 +/- 58 mg/g, and for material B at 30 days it was 33 +/- 27 mg/g.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1991        PMID: 2022769     DOI: 10.1177/00220345910700050101

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Dent Res        ISSN: 0022-0345            Impact factor:   6.116


  7 in total

Review 1.  Resilient liners: a review.

Authors:  Shobha Rodrigues; Vidya Shenoy; Thilak Shetty
Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc       Date:  2012-07-06

2.  Enhanced Two-Stage Reactive Polymer Network Forming Systems.

Authors:  Devatha P Nair; Neil B Cramer; Matthew K McBride; John C Gaipa; Robin Shandas; Christopher N Bowman
Journal:  Polymer (Guildf)       Date:  2012-04-14       Impact factor: 4.430

3.  Effect of Food Simulating Agents on the Hardness and Bond Strength of a Silicone Soft Liner to a Denture Base Acrylic Resin.

Authors:  A A R Khaledi; M Bahrani; S Shirzadi
Journal:  Open Dent J       Date:  2015-12-23

4.  Comparison of the Effect of two Denture Cleansers on Tensile bond Strength of a Denture Liner.

Authors:  M Farzin; F Bahrani; E Adelpour
Journal:  J Dent (Shiraz)       Date:  2013-09

5.  Effect of beverages on the hardness and tensile bond strength of temporary acrylic soft liners to acrylic resin denture base.

Authors:  A Safari; M Vojdani; S Mogharrabi; N Iraji Nasrabadi; R Derafshi
Journal:  J Dent (Shiraz)       Date:  2013-12

6.  Histopathological changes by the use of soft reline materials: a rat model study.

Authors:  Michele Bail; Lissandra Matos Brol Meister; Eduardo Bauml Campagnoli; Janaina Habib Jorge; Manuella de Cassia Iglesias Ban; Alfonso Sanchez-Ayala; Nara Hellen Campanha
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-06-25       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  The Physicochemical Characteristics of Prosthetic Materials and Their Influence on Their Clinical Properties.

Authors:  Katarzyna Adamska; Beata Strzemiecka; Rafał Brożek; Ryszard Koczorowski; Adam Voelkel
Journal:  Chromatographia       Date:  2017-10-28       Impact factor: 2.044

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.