Literature DB >> 20227623

Comparison of sensory outcomes in patients with monofixation versus bifoveal fusion after surgery for intermittent exotropia.

David Morrison1, William McSwain, Sean Donahue.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The predictive value of preoperative stereopsis on the surgical outcome of patients with intermittent exotropia is unknown. We hypothesize that it may predict motor and sensory outcome. We report our experience with fusional status at near measured using Titmus circles before and after eye muscle surgery for intermittent exotropia.
METHODS: In this retrospective case series, 95 children underwent bilateral lateral rectus muscle recession. Visual acuity, near stereoacuity, and ocular alignment were measured before surgery and 2 months postoperatively.
RESULTS: Testing variability by use of Titmus circles was examined. A change of greater than 3 stereo circles was found to be substantial (90% confidence interval). Of the 42 children with poor-to-nondetectable stereopsis preoperatively (400 arcsec or worse), 3 improved substantially (140, 140, 60 arcsec). The remaining 53 had moderate- (200 arcsec) to high-grade (60 arcsec or better) stereopsis preoperatively. The majority of children had no change in stereopsis after surgery. Only 4 children had improved stereopsis after surgery; 6 lost stereopsis, of whom 4 had persistent small-angle esodeviations, whereas 1 child had a large overcorrection requiring additional surgery. All children who maintained or improved their stereopsis postoperatively were orthotropic or had persistent exodeviation after surgery. No child with high-grade stereopsis at 2 consecutive preoperative visits lost stereoacuity after surgery.
CONCLUSIONS: A persistent small-angle esotropia at the 2-month postoperative visit is associated with a loss of near stereopsis (p=0.0001) and may occur more frequently in children with subnormal stereopsis preoperatively than in patients with bifoveal fixation. Prism or reoperation may be necessary to treat this complication. Copyright (c) 2010 American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20227623     DOI: 10.1016/j.jaapos.2009.11.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J AAPOS        ISSN: 1091-8531            Impact factor:   1.220


  10 in total

Review 1.  Predictors of stereoacuity outcome in visually mature subjects with exotropia.

Authors:  F Koç; N Sefi-Yurdakul
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2015-11-20       Impact factor: 3.775

2.  Comparative study of plication-recession versus resection-recession in unilateral surgery for intermittent exotropia.

Authors:  Yugo Kimura; Tohru Kimura
Journal:  Jpn J Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-02-10       Impact factor: 2.447

3.  Surgical outcomes of symmetric and asymmetric surgery for intermittent exotropia with postoperative large early overcorrection.

Authors:  Hwan Heo; Mi Sun Sung; Sang Woo Park
Journal:  Jpn J Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-07-06       Impact factor: 2.447

4.  Postoperative outcomes of patients initially overcorrected for intermittent exotropia.

Authors:  Stacy L Pineles; Luke W Deitz; Federico G Velez
Journal:  J AAPOS       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 1.220

5.  Survival analysis following early surgical success in intermittent exotropia surgery.

Authors:  Joo Yeon Lee; Sung Ju Ko; Sung Uk Baek
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-06-18       Impact factor: 1.779

6.  Exotropia in children with high hyperopia.

Authors:  Iris S Kassem; Steven E Rubin; Sylvia R Kodsi
Journal:  J AAPOS       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 1.220

7.  Predictive factors of stereopsis outcomes following strabismus surgery.

Authors:  Mohammad Eshaghi; Amir Arabi; Shahram Banaie; Toktam Shahraki; Sarvin Eshaghi; Hamed Esfandiari
Journal:  Ther Adv Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-03-24

8.  Functional changes in the visual cortex in preoperative and postoperative patients with intermittent exotropia: study protocol for a non-randomised case-control clinical trial.

Authors:  Yanan Guo; Jing Fu; Jie Hong; Zhaohui Liu; Xueying He
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-02-24       Impact factor: 2.692

9.  Comparison of sensory outcomes in patients with successful motor outcome versus recurrent exotropia after surgery for intermittent exotropia.

Authors:  Hye Jun Joo; Jin Ju Choi; Jin Woo Ro; Dong Gyu Choi
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-08-01       Impact factor: 4.996

10.  Comparison of Surgical Outcomes with Unilateral Recession and Resection According to Angle of Deviation in Basic Intermittent Exotropia.

Authors:  Soon Young Cho; Se Youp Lee; Jong Hyun Jung
Journal:  Korean J Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-11-25
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.