Literature DB >> 20227457

The fish is bad: Negative food odors elicit faster and more accurate reactions than other odors.

S Boesveldt1, J Frasnelli, A R Gordon, J N Lundström.   

Abstract

Dissociating between 'good' or 'bad' odors is arguable of crucial value for human survival, since unpleasant odors often signal danger. Therefore, negative odors demand a faster response in order to quickly avoid or move away from negative situations. We know from other sensory systems that this effect is most evident for stimuli from ecologically-relevant categories. In the olfactory system the classification of odors into the food or non-food category is of eminent importance. We therefore aimed to explore the link between odor processing speed and accuracy and odor edibility and valence by assessing response time and detection accuracy. We observed that reaction time and detection accuracy are influenced by both pleasantness and edibility. Specifically, we showed that an unpleasant food odor is detected faster and more accurately than odors of other categories. These results suggest that the olfactory system reacts faster and more accurately to ecologically-relevant stimuli that signal a potential danger. Copyright 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20227457     DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2010.03.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Psychol        ISSN: 0301-0511            Impact factor:   3.251


  23 in total

1.  Superadditive opercular activation to food flavor is mediated by enhanced temporal and limbic coupling.

Authors:  Janina Seubert; Kathrin Ohla; Yoshiko Yokomukai; Thilo Kellermann; Johan N Lundström
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2014-12-26       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Severity of olfactory deficits is reflected in functional brain networks-An fMRI study.

Authors:  Johanna L Reichert; Elbrich M Postma; Paul A M Smeets; Wilbert M Boek; Kees de Graaf; Veronika Schöpf; Sanne Boesveldt
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2018-03-30       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  Spatiotemporal dynamics of odor representations in the human brain revealed by EEG decoding.

Authors:  Mugihiko Kato; Toshiki Okumura; Yasuhiro Tsubo; Junya Honda; Masashi Sugiyama; Kazushige Touhara; Masako Okamoto
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2022-05-18       Impact factor: 12.779

4.  Semantic knowledge influences prewired hedonic responses to odors.

Authors:  Johan Poncelet; Fanny Rinck; Anne Ziessel; Pauline Joussain; Marc Thévenet; Catherine Rouby; Moustafa Bensafi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-11-08       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Multidimensional representation of odors in the human olfactory cortex.

Authors:  A Fournel; C Ferdenzi; C Sezille; C Rouby; M Bensafi
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2016-03-16       Impact factor: 5.038

6.  Positive relationship between odor identification and affective responses of negatively valenced odors.

Authors:  Lenka Martinec Nováková; Dagmar Plotěná; S Craig Roberts; Jan Havlíček
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-05-11

7.  Repeated exposure to odors induces affective habituation of perception and sniffing.

Authors:  Camille Ferdenzi; Johan Poncelet; Catherine Rouby; Moustafa Bensafi
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2014-04-10       Impact factor: 3.558

8.  Background stimulus delays detection of target stimulus in a familiar odor-odor combination.

Authors:  Naomi Gotow; Ayaka Hoshi; Tatsu Kobayakawa
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-06-07       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  The sweetest thing: the influence of angularity, symmetry, and the number of elements on shape-valence and shape-taste matches.

Authors:  Alejandro Salgado-Montejo; Jorge A Alvarado; Carlos Velasco; Carlos J Salgado; Kendra Hasse; Charles Spence
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-09-15

Review 10.  Time to smell: a cascade model of human olfactory perception based on response-time (RT) measurement.

Authors:  Jonas K Olofsson
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-02-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.