M Keshtgar1, N Aresti, F Macneil. 1. The Royal Free and University College Medical School, UCL, London; The Raven Department of Education, Royal College of Surgeons of England. Mo.keshtgar@royalfree.nhs.uk
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: The UK National training programme (NEWSTART) for SLNB in breast cancer was established in 2004, aimed at providing structured, standardised training with a focus on multidisciplinary team (MDT) delivery. METHODOLOGY: A questionnaire was devised and after approval by the Association of Breast Surgeons (ABS) executive committee they were sent to all full members of the ABS. RESULTS: Most (97%) of breast surgeons are convinced by the evidence for SLNB as standard of care for early breast cancer. 64% use SLNB to stage clinically node negative patients, of whom 23% use it as a standalone procedure. 38% of surgeons were dissatisfied with the time it takes to complete the in house training, and 87% with the time it takes to complete the validation phase. Logistical and funding issues were the main problems cited. The majority of surgeons (86%) use the recommended combined technique, with 47% continuing to use the dual localisation method. 14% use either blue dye or isotope alone, without scintiscan. Only 10% offer intra operative diagnosis, of which the majority (6%) use touch imprint cytology. 31% included their results in their most recent surgical appraisal. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of breast surgeons in the UK are convinced by the evidence for SLNB, and most use SLNB in their practice for staging. Reasons for not conducting SLNB are logistical rather than lack of belief in the procedure. The majority of respondents completed their training within the anticipated time line. The majority of centres do not perform intra-operative assessment. Copyright (c) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
INTRODUCTION: The UK National training programme (NEWSTART) for SLNB in breast cancer was established in 2004, aimed at providing structured, standardised training with a focus on multidisciplinary team (MDT) delivery. METHODOLOGY: A questionnaire was devised and after approval by the Association of Breast Surgeons (ABS) executive committee they were sent to all full members of the ABS. RESULTS: Most (97%) of breast surgeons are convinced by the evidence for SLNB as standard of care for early breast cancer. 64% use SLNB to stage clinically node negative patients, of whom 23% use it as a standalone procedure. 38% of surgeons were dissatisfied with the time it takes to complete the in house training, and 87% with the time it takes to complete the validation phase. Logistical and funding issues were the main problems cited. The majority of surgeons (86%) use the recommended combined technique, with 47% continuing to use the dual localisation method. 14% use either blue dye or isotope alone, without scintiscan. Only 10% offer intra operative diagnosis, of which the majority (6%) use touch imprint cytology. 31% included their results in their most recent surgical appraisal. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of breast surgeons in the UK are convinced by the evidence for SLNB, and most use SLNB in their practice for staging. Reasons for not conducting SLNB are logistical rather than lack of belief in the procedure. The majority of respondents completed their training within the anticipated time line. The majority of centres do not perform intra-operative assessment. Copyright (c) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Authors: Joost R van der Vorst; Boudewijn E Schaafsma; Floris P R Verbeek; Merlijn Hutteman; J Sven D Mieog; Clemens W G M Lowik; Gerrit-Jan Liefers; John V Frangioni; Cornelis J H van de Velde; Alexander L Vahrmeijer Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2012-07-03 Impact factor: 5.344