Literature DB >> 20227080

On stiffness of scaffolds for bone tissue engineering-a numerical study.

Stefan Sturm1, Shiwei Zhou, Yiu-Wing Mai, Qing Li.   

Abstract

Tissue scaffolds are typically designed and fabricated to match native bone properties. However, it is unclear if this would lead to the best tissue ingrowth outcome within the scaffold as neo-tissue keeps changing the stiffness of entire construct. This paper presents a numerical method to address this issue for design optimization and assessment of tissue scaffolds. The elasticity tensors of two different types of bones are weighted by different multipliers before being used as the targets in scaffold design. A cost function regarding the difference between the effective elasticity tensor, calculated by the homogenization technique, and the target tensor, is minimized by using topology optimization procedure. It is found that different stiffnesses can lead to different remodeling results. The comparison confirms that bone remodeling is at its best when the scaffold elastic tensor matches or is slightly higher than the elastic properties of the host bone. Copyright (c) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20227080     DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2010.02.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.712


  10 in total

Review 1.  Scaffold translation: barriers between concept and clinic.

Authors:  Scott J Hollister; William L Murphy
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part B Rev       Date:  2011-09-21       Impact factor: 6.389

2.  Biomechanical evaluation of porous bioactive ceramics after implantation: micro CT-based three-dimensional finite element analysis.

Authors:  Li-Mei Ren; Takaaki Arahira; Mitsugu Todo; Hideki Yoshikawa; Akira Myoui
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2011-11-23       Impact factor: 3.896

3.  Computationally designed lattices with tuned properties for tissue engineering using 3D printing.

Authors:  Paul F Egan; Veronica C Gonella; Max Engensperger; Stephen J Ferguson; Kristina Shea
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-08-10       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Histology-based homogenization analysis of soft tissue: application to prostate cancer.

Authors:  Javier Palacio-Torralba; Daniel W Good; S Alan McNeill; Robert L Reuben; Yuhang Chen
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 4.118

Review 5.  Additive manufacturing of bone scaffolds.

Authors:  Youwen Yang; Guoyong Wang; Huixin Liang; Chengde Gao; Shuping Peng; Lida Shen; Cijun Shuai
Journal:  Int J Bioprint       Date:  2018-12-12

Review 6.  Challenges on optimization of 3D-printed bone scaffolds.

Authors:  Marjan Bahraminasab
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2020-09-03       Impact factor: 2.819

7.  The Role of Substrate Topography and Stiffness on MSC Cells Functions: Key Material Properties for Biomimetic Bone Tissue Engineering.

Authors:  Foteini K Kozaniti; Despina D Deligianni; Margarita D Georgiou; Diana V Portan
Journal:  Biomimetics (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-31

8.  Total and partial knee arthroplasty implants that maintain native load transfer in the tibia.

Authors:  Maxwell J Munford; Jennifer C Stoddart; Alexander D Liddle; Justin P Cobb; Jonathan R T Jeffers
Journal:  Bone Joint Res       Date:  2022-02       Impact factor: 5.853

9.  A mechanobiological computer optimization framework to design scaffolds to enhance bone regeneration.

Authors:  Camille Perier-Metz; Georg N Duda; Sara Checa
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2022-09-07

10.  Initial mechanical conditions within an optimized bone scaffold do not ensure bone regeneration - an in silico analysis.

Authors:  Camille Perier-Metz; Georg N Duda; Sara Checa
Journal:  Biomech Model Mechanobiol       Date:  2021-06-07
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.