Literature DB >> 20227005

Coronary blood flow and perfusion pressure during coronary angiography in patients with ongoing mechanical chest compression: a report on 6 cases.

Alf Inge Larsen1, Ashild Hjørnevik, Vernon Bonarjee, Ståle Barvik, Tor Melberg, Dennis Winston Nilsen.   

Abstract

Patients with pulseless electrical activity or refractory ventricular fibrillation have a very bad prognosis. Coronary angiography and angioplasty may be required to restore an effective circulation, but this must be performed whilst chest compressions are continued. The LUCAS chest compression device is suitable for this purpose. So far there are no reports on the effect of this device on coronary circulation in humans. We monitored the coronary perfusion pressure assessed invasively as the difference between the diastolic pressures at the coronary ostium and right atrium, and compared these pressures with coronary flow graded using the TIMI scale in 6 patients. In 4 out of 6 we found a satisfactory coronary artery perfusion pressure and TIMI grade 3 flow (normal) on coronary angiography. Two of these patients survived the first 24h. Two patients did not have a satisfactory perfusion pressure and adequate flow rate was not seen. Copyright (c) 2010 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20227005     DOI: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2010.02.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Resuscitation        ISSN: 0300-9572            Impact factor:   5.262


  6 in total

1.  Prompt use of mechanical cardiopulmonary resuscitation in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: the MECCA study report.

Authors:  Venkataraman Anantharaman; Boon Lui Benjamin Ng; Shiang Hu Ang; Chun Yue Francis Lee; Siew Hon Benjamin Leong; Marcus Eng Hock Ong; Siang Jin Terrance Chua; Antony Charles Rabind; Nagaraj Baglody Anjali; Ying Hao
Journal:  Singapore Med J       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 1.858

2.  Evaluation of coronary blood flow velocity during cardiac arrest with circulation maintained through mechanical chest compressions in a porcine model.

Authors:  Henrik Wagner; Bjarne Madsen Hardig; Stig Steen; Trygve Sjoberg; Jan Harnek; Goran K Olivecrona
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2011-12-19       Impact factor: 2.298

3.  Minnesota Resuscitation Consortium's Advanced Perfusion and Reperfusion Cardiac Life Support Strategy for Out-of-Hospital Refractory Ventricular Fibrillation.

Authors:  Demetris Yannopoulos; Jason A Bartos; Cindy Martin; Ganesh Raveendran; Emil Missov; Marc Conterato; R J Frascone; Alexander Trembley; Kevin Sipprell; Ranjit John; Stephen George; Kathleen Carlson; Melissa E Brunsvold; Santiago Garcia; Tom P Aufderheide
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2016-06-13       Impact factor: 5.501

4.  Mechanical chest compressions for cardiac arrest in the cath-lab: when is it enough and who should go to extracorporeal cardio pulmonary resuscitation?

Authors:  Bjarne Madsen Hardig; Karl B Kern; Henrik Wagner
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2019-06-03       Impact factor: 2.298

5.  Comparison of hemodynamic effects and resuscitation outcomes between automatic simultaneous sterno-thoracic cardiopulmonary resuscitation device and LUCAS in a swine model of cardiac arrest.

Authors:  Kyoung-Chul Cha; Hyung Il Kim; Yong Won Kim; Gyo Jin Ahn; Yoon Seob Kim; Sun Ju Kim; Jun Hyuk Lee; Sung Oh Hwang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-08-30       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Complications of mechanical chest compression devices.

Authors:  M Platenkamp; L C Otterspoor
Journal:  Neth Heart J       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 2.380

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.