Literature DB >> 20226559

Linking payment to health outcomes: a taxonomy and examination of performance-based reimbursement schemes between healthcare payers and manufacturers.

Josh J Carlson1, Sean D Sullivan, Louis P Garrison, Peter J Neumann, David L Veenstra.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To identify, categorize and examine performance-based health outcomes reimbursement schemes for medical technology.
METHODS: We performed a review of performance-based health outcomes reimbursement schemes over the past 10 years (7/98-010/09) using publicly available databases, web and grey literature searches, and input from healthcare reimbursement experts. We developed a taxonomy of scheme types by inductively organizing the schemes identified according to the timing, execution, and health outcomes measured in the schemes.
RESULTS: Our search yielded 34 coverage with evidence development schemes, 10 conditional treatment continuation schemes, and 14 performance-linked reimbursement schemes. The majority of schemes are in Europe and Australia, with an increasing number in Canada and the U.S.
CONCLUSION: These schemes have the potential to alter the reimbursement and pricing landscape for medical technology, but significant challenges, including high transaction costs and insufficient information systems, may limit their long-term impact. Future studies regarding experiences and outcomes of implemented schemes are necessary. Copyright 2010 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20226559     DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2010.02.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Policy        ISSN: 0168-8510            Impact factor:   2.980


  48 in total

1.  Comparative effectiveness research: the view from a pharmaceutical company.

Authors:  Marc L Berger; David Grainger
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 4.981

2.  Use of product listing agreements by Canadian provincial drug benefit plans.

Authors:  Steven G Morgan; Melissa K Friesen; Paige A Thomson; Jamie R Daw
Journal:  Healthc Policy       Date:  2013-05

3.  Product listing agreements (PLAs): a new tool for reaching Quebec's pharmaceutical policy objectives?

Authors:  Mélanie Bourassa Forcier; François Noël
Journal:  Healthc Policy       Date:  2013-08

4.  A new model for reimbursing genome-based cancer care.

Authors:  Scott D Ramsey; Sean D Sullivan
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2013-12-05

5.  Relative effectiveness and the European pharmaceutical market.

Authors:  Bengt Jönsson
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2011-04

6.  Market-access agreements for anti-cancer drugs.

Authors:  Katelijne van de Vooren; Alessandro Curto; Nick Freemantle; Livio Garattini
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2014-12-08       Impact factor: 5.344

Review 7.  Disinvestment and Value-Based Purchasing Strategies for Pharmaceuticals: An International Review.

Authors:  Bonny Parkinson; Catherine Sermet; Fiona Clement; Steffan Crausaz; Brian Godman; Sarah Garner; Moni Choudhury; Sallie-Anne Pearson; Rosalie Viney; Ruth Lopert; Adam G Elshaug
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 8.  Evaluation of technologies approved for supplemental payments in the United States.

Authors:  Timothy J Judson; Sanket S Dhruva; Rita F Redberg
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2019-06-17

Review 9.  Performance-Based Risk-Sharing Arrangements: An Updated International Review.

Authors:  Josh J Carlson; Shuxian Chen; Louis P Garrison
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 10.  Cost, coverage, and comparative effectiveness research: the critical issues for oncology.

Authors:  Steven D Pearson
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-10-15       Impact factor: 44.544

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.