Literature DB >> 20225924

Timing and risk factors for new brain metastasis formation in patients initially treated only with Gamma Knife surgery. Clinical article.

Jason P Sheehan1, Chun-Po Yen, James Nguyen, Jessica A Rainey, Kasandra Dassoulas, David J Schlesinger.   

Abstract

OBJECT: Stereotactic radiosurgery has been shown to afford a reasonable chance of local tumor control. However, new brain metastasis can arise following successful local tumor control from radiosurgery. This study evaluates the timing, number, and risk factors for development of subsequent new brain metastasis in a group of patients treated with stereotactic radiosurgery alone.
METHODS: One hundred seventeen patients with histologically confirmed metastatic cancer underwent Gamma Knife surgery (GKS) to treat all brain metastases demonstrable on MR imaging. Patients were followed clinically and radiologically at approximately 3-month intervals for a median of 14.4 months (range 0.37-51.8 months). Follow-up MR images were evaluated for evidence of new brain metastasis formation. Statistical analyses were performed to determine the timing, number, and risk factors for development of new brain metastases.
RESULTS: The median time to development of a new brain metastasis was 8.8 months. Patients with 3 or more metastases at the time of initial radiosurgery or those with cancer histologies other than non-small cell lung carcinoma were found to be at increased risk for early formation of new brain metastasis (p < 0.05). The mean number of new metastases per patient was 1.6 (range 0-11). Those with a higher Karnofsky Performance Scale score at the time of initial GKS were significantly more likely to develop a greater number of brain metastases by the last follow-up evaluation.
CONCLUSIONS: The timing and number of new brain metastases developing in patients treated with GKS alone is not inconsequential. Those with 3 or more metastases at the time of radiosurgery and those with cancer histology other than non-small cell lung carcinoma were at greater risk of early formation of new brain metastasis. Frequent follow-up evaluations, such as at 3-month intervals, appears appropriate in this patient population, particularly in high-risk patients. When detected early, salvage treatments including repeat radiosurgery can be used to treat new brain metastasis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20225924     DOI: 10.3171/2010.2.JNS091539

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosurg        ISSN: 0022-3085            Impact factor:   5.115


  9 in total

1.  Progression of the lung cancer primary correlates with the identification of new brain metastases after initial radiosurgery.

Authors:  Jung Ho Han; Dong Gyu Kim; Chang Wan Oh; Chae-Yong Kim; Young Hoon Kim; Jeong Hoon Park; Eun Kyung Kim; Hee-Won Jung
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2011-07-06       Impact factor: 4.130

2.  Gamma knife radiosurgery for the treatment of gynecologic malignancies metastasizing to the brain: clinical article.

Authors:  Matthew J Shepard; Francis Fezeu; Cheng-Chia Lee; Jason P Sheehan
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2014-08-17       Impact factor: 4.130

3.  Clinical factors associated with mortality within three months after radiosurgery of asymptomatic brain metastases from non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Bina Kakusa; Summer Han; Sonya Aggarwal; Boxiang Liu; Gordon Li; Scott Soltys; Melanie Hayden Gephart
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2018-11-20       Impact factor: 4.130

4.  Validation of Recursive Partitioning Analysis and Diagnosis-Specific Graded Prognostic Assessment in patients treated initially with radiosurgery alone.

Authors:  Anna Likhacheva; Chelsea C Pinnix; Neil Parikh; Pamela K Allen; Nandita Guha-Thakurta; Mary McAleer; Erik P Sulman; Anita Mahajan; Almon Shiu; Dershan Luo; Max Chiu; Paul D Brown; Sujit S Prabhu; Eric L Chang
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 5.115

5.  Evaluation of mini-mental status examination score after gamma knife radiosurgery as the first radiation treatment for brain metastases.

Authors:  Kiyoshi Nakazaki; Hideyuki Kano
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2013-02-14       Impact factor: 4.130

6.  Spatial shifts in frame-based Gamma Knife radiosurgery: A case for cone beam CT imaging as quality assurance using the Gamma Knife® Icon™.

Authors:  M Sean Peach; Daniel M Trifiletti; Sunil W Dutta; James M Larner; David J Schlesinger; Jason P Sheehan
Journal:  J Radiosurg SBRT       Date:  2018

7.  Repeat courses of SRS in patients initially treated with SRS alone for brain-metastatic melanoma.

Authors:  James E Bates; Paul Youn; Kenneth Y Usuki; Sughosh Dhakal; Michael T Milano
Journal:  Melanoma Manag       Date:  2016-05-25

8.  Clinical and economic outcomes of patients with brain metastases based on symptoms: an argument for routine brain screening of those treated with upfront radiosurgery.

Authors:  Scott C Lester; Glen B Taksler; J Griff Kuremsky; John T Lucas; Diandra N Ayala-Peacock; David M Randolph; J Daniel Bourland; Adrian W Laxton; Stephen B Tatter; Michael D Chan
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2013-10-21       Impact factor: 6.921

9.  Value of screening and follow-up brain MRI scans in patients with metastatic melanoma.

Authors:  Annemarie C Eggen; Thijs T Wind; Ingeborg Bosma; Miranda C A Kramer; Peter Jan van Laar; Hiska L van der Weide; Geke A P Hospers; Mathilde Jalving
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2021-11-05       Impact factor: 4.452

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.