OBJECTIVE: The aims of the study were to determine the immune responses to candidate viral triggers of multiple sclerosis (MS) in patients with clinically isolated syndromes (CISs), and to evaluate their potential value in predicting conversion to MS. METHODS: Immune responses to Epstein-Barr virus (EBV), human herpesvirus 6, cytomegalovirus (HCMV), and measles were determined in a cohort of 147 CIS patients with a mean follow-up of 7 years and compared with 50 demographically matched controls. RESULTS: Compared with controls, CIS patients showed increased humoral (p < 0.0001) and cellular (p = 0.007) immune responses to the EBV-encoded nuclear antigen-1 (EBNA1), but not to other EBV-derived proteins. Immunoglobulin G (IgG) responses to other virus antigens and frequencies of T cells specific for HCMV and influenza virus gene products were unchanged in CIS patients. EBNA1 was the only viral antigen with which immune responses correlated with number of T2 lesions (p = 0.006) and number of Barkhof criteria (p=0.001) at baseline, and with number of T2 lesions (p = 0.012 at both 1 and 5 years), presence of new T2 lesions (p = 0.003 and p = 0.028 at 1 and 5 years), and Expanded Disability Status Scale score (p = 0.015 and p = 0.010 at 1 and 5 years) during follow-up. In a univariate Cox regression model, increased EBNA1-specific IgG responses predicted conversion to MS based on McDonald criteria (hazard ratio [95% confidence interval], 2.2 [1.2-4.3]; p = 0.003). INTERPRETATION: Our results indicate that elevated immune responses toward EBNA1 are selectively increased in CIS patients and suggest that EBNA1-specific IgG titers could be used as a prognostic marker for disease conversion and disability progression.
OBJECTIVE: The aims of the study were to determine the immune responses to candidate viral triggers of multiple sclerosis (MS) in patients with clinically isolated syndromes (CISs), and to evaluate their potential value in predicting conversion to MS. METHODS: Immune responses to Epstein-Barr virus (EBV), human herpesvirus 6, cytomegalovirus (HCMV), and measles were determined in a cohort of 147 CIS patients with a mean follow-up of 7 years and compared with 50 demographically matched controls. RESULTS: Compared with controls, CIS patients showed increased humoral (p < 0.0001) and cellular (p = 0.007) immune responses to the EBV-encoded nuclear antigen-1 (EBNA1), but not to other EBV-derived proteins. Immunoglobulin G (IgG) responses to other virus antigens and frequencies of T cells specific for HCMV and influenza virus gene products were unchanged in CIS patients. EBNA1 was the only viral antigen with which immune responses correlated with number of T2 lesions (p = 0.006) and number of Barkhof criteria (p=0.001) at baseline, and with number of T2 lesions (p = 0.012 at both 1 and 5 years), presence of new T2 lesions (p = 0.003 and p = 0.028 at 1 and 5 years), and Expanded Disability Status Scale score (p = 0.015 and p = 0.010 at 1 and 5 years) during follow-up. In a univariate Cox regression model, increased EBNA1-specific IgG responses predicted conversion to MS based on McDonald criteria (hazard ratio [95% confidence interval], 2.2 [1.2-4.3]; p = 0.003). INTERPRETATION: Our results indicate that elevated immune responses toward EBNA1 are selectively increased in CIS patients and suggest that EBNA1-specific IgG titers could be used as a prognostic marker for disease conversion and disability progression.
Authors: Donna Hochberg; Jaap M Middeldorp; Michelle Catalina; John L Sullivan; Katherine Luzuriaga; David A Thorley-Lawson Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2003-12-19 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: A Ascherio; K L Munger; E T Lennette; D Spiegelman; M A Hernán; M J Olek; S E Hankinson; D J Hunter Journal: JAMA Date: 2001-12-26 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Jeffrey R Currier; Ellen G Kuta; Ellen Turk; Lyndsay B Earhart; Larry Loomis-Price; Sylvia Janetzki; Guido Ferrari; Deborah L Birx; Josephine H Cox Journal: J Immunol Methods Date: 2002-02-01 Impact factor: 2.303
Authors: M Colombo; M Dono; P Gazzola; S Roncella; A Valetto; N Chiorazzi; G L Mancardi; M Ferrarini Journal: J Immunol Date: 2000-03-01 Impact factor: 5.422
Authors: Stephen L Hauser; Emmanuelle Waubant; Douglas L Arnold; Timothy Vollmer; Jack Antel; Robert J Fox; Amit Bar-Or; Michael Panzara; Neena Sarkar; Sunil Agarwal; Annette Langer-Gould; Craig H Smith Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2008-02-14 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Insoo Kang; Timothy Quan; Helena Nolasco; Sung-Hwan Park; Myung Sun Hong; Jill Crouch; Eric G Pamer; John Greg Howe; Joe Craft Journal: J Immunol Date: 2004-01-15 Impact factor: 5.422
Authors: Peter A Brex; Olga Ciccarelli; Jonathon I O'Riordan; Michael Sailer; Alan J Thompson; David H Miller Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2002-01-17 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: W I McDonald; A Compston; G Edan; D Goodkin; H P Hartung; F D Lublin; H F McFarland; D W Paty; C H Polman; S C Reingold; M Sandberg-Wollheim; W Sibley; A Thompson; S van den Noort; B Y Weinshenker; J S Wolinsky Journal: Ann Neurol Date: 2001-07 Impact factor: 10.422
Authors: Katarina Tengvall; Jesse Huang; Cecilia Hellström; Patrick Kammer; Martin Biström; Burcu Ayoglu; Izaura Lima Bomfim; Pernilla Stridh; Julia Butt; Nicole Brenner; Angelika Michel; Karin Lundberg; Leonid Padyukov; Ingrid E Lundberg; Elisabet Svenungsson; Ingemar Ernberg; Sigurgeir Olafsson; Alexander T Dilthey; Jan Hillert; Lars Alfredsson; Peter Sundström; Peter Nilsson; Tim Waterboer; Tomas Olsson; Ingrid Kockum Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2019-08-02 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Adam E Handel; Alexander J Williamson; Giulio Disanto; Lahiru Handunnetthi; Gavin Giovannoni; Sreeram V Ramagopalan Journal: PLoS One Date: 2010-09-01 Impact factor: 3.240