Literature DB >> 20224961

Medicine versus orthopaedic service for hospital management of hip fractures.

Cynthia H Chuang1, Gregory J Pinkowsky, Christopher S Hollenbeak, April D Armstrong.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Hospital care of patients with hip fractures often is managed primarily by either a medicine or orthopaedic service, depending on the institution. Whether complication rates, length of stay, or time to surgery differs on different services is unknown. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We therefore determined whether (1) perioperative complication rates, and (2) length of stay and time to surgery for patients undergoing surgical management of hip fractures differed by the specialty of the primary service. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study at a university-based academic hospital of patients undergoing surgery for hip fracture admitted to medicine and orthopaedic services during 2006. Of the 98 patients included in the analysis, 34% were managed by a medicine service and 66% by orthopaedics. Using multivariable regression models to adjust for patient characteristics and comorbidities, we determined whether service designation predicted the likelihood of severe or intermediate perioperative complications, length of stay, or time to surgery.
RESULTS: The rate of severe or intermediate complications for patients undergoing surgical management of hip fractures was 30%. Patients with medicine or orthopaedic services did not differ in the rate of severe or intermediate complications or length of stay in adjusted analysis. However, time to surgery was longer in patients managed by the medical service in adjusted analysis.
CONCLUSIONS: In our patient cohort, the likelihood of perioperative complications occurring among patients with hip fractures did not differ by service designation in adjusted analysis. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II, prognostic study. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20224961      PMCID: PMC2895834          DOI: 10.1007/s11999-010-1290-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  6 in total

1.  Effects of a hospitalist model on elderly patients with hip fracture.

Authors:  Michael P Phy; David J Vanness; L Joseph Melton; Kirsten Hall Long; Cathy D Schleck; Dirk R Larson; Paul M Huddleston; Jeanne M Huddleston
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2005-04-11

2.  Efficacy of a comprehensive geriatric intervention in older patients hospitalized for hip fracture: a randomized, controlled trial.

Authors:  Maite Vidán; José A Serra; Concepción Moreno; Gerardo Riquelme; Javier Ortiz
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 5.562

3.  Secular trends in hip fracture occurrence and survival: age and sex differences.

Authors:  W E Bacon
Journal:  J Aging Health       Date:  1996-11

Review 4.  Estimating hip fracture morbidity, mortality and costs.

Authors:  R Scott Braithwaite; Nananda F Col; John B Wong
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 5.562

5.  Medical and surgical comanagement after elective hip and knee arthroplasty: a randomized, controlled trial.

Authors:  Jeanne M Huddleston; Kirsten Hall Long; James M Naessens; David Vanness; Dirk Larson; Robert Trousdale; Matt Plevak; Miguel Cabanela; Duane Ilstrup; Robert M Wachter
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2004-07-06       Impact factor: 25.391

6.  Effects of a hospitalist care model on mortality of elderly patients with hip fractures.

Authors:  John A Batsis; Michael P Phy; L Joseph Melton; Cathy D Schleck; Dirk R Larson; Paul M Huddleston; Jeanne M Huddleston
Journal:  J Hosp Med       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 2.960

  6 in total
  6 in total

Review 1.  Prognostic factors of in-hospital complications after hip fracture surgery: a scoping review.

Authors:  K J Sheehan; E M Guerrero; D Tainter; B Dial; R Milton-Cole; J A Blair; J Alexander; P Swamy; L Kuramoto; P Guy; J P Bettger; B Sobolev
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2019-04-29       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  Does Admission to Medicine or Orthopaedics Impact a Geriatric Hip Patient's Hospital Length of Stay?

Authors:  Sarah E Greenberg; Jacob P VanHouten; Nikita Lakomkin; Jesse Ehrenfeld; Amir Alex Jahangir; Robert H Boyce; William T Obremksey; Manish K Sethi
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 2.512

3.  Internal medicine physician embedded in an orthopedic service in a level 1 hospital: clinical impact.

Authors:  Sagi Shashar; Vera Polischuk; Tai Friesem
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2021-04-26       Impact factor: 3.397

4.  An Orthopedic-Hospitalist Comanaged Hip Fracture Service Reduces Inpatient Length of Stay.

Authors:  Daniel N Bracey; Tunc C Kiymaz; David C Holst; Kamran S Hamid; Johannes F Plate; Erik C Summers; Cynthia L Emory; Riyaz H Jinnah
Journal:  Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil       Date:  2016-08-08

5.  Admitting Service Affects Cost and Length of Stay of Hip Fracture Patients.

Authors:  Ariana Lott; Jack Haglin; Rebekah Belayneh; Sanjit R Konda; Kenneth A Egol
Journal:  Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil       Date:  2018-11-21

6.  The impact of care process development and comorbidity on time to surgery, mortality rate and functional outcome for hip fracture patients: a retrospective analysis over 19 years with data from the Swedish National Registry for hip fracture patients, RIKSHÖFT.

Authors:  Emma Turesson; Kjell Ivarsson; Karl-Göran Thorngren; Ami Hommel
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2019-12-26       Impact factor: 2.362

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.