Literature DB >> 2022456

A standardized technique for lower limb radiography. Practice, applications, and error analysis.

D Siu1, T D Cooke, L D Broekhoven, M Lam, B Fisher, G Saunders, T W Challis.   

Abstract

The normal standing radiograph, which provides a view of the knee only, is prone to errors of parallax and poor control of patient positioning. A standardized radiographic procedure was developed to control these sources of error. Anteroposterior and lateral views of the lower limb (hip and knee) are obtained without moving the patient from a standardized position; this includes control of ankle position and limb rotation. To correct for parallax error, radiopaque markers are positioned between the patient and the x-ray source. The locations of bone landmarks and reference markers on the radiographs are digitized, and a software package provides a display of key parameters. Error analysis of the method confirmed that most angles were sensitive to contrived positional variations, especially limb rotation and knee flexion. Load distribution between limbs was not critical. The greatest error was random. Most angles were reproducible within +/- 1.3 degrees or less at 95% confidence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 2022456     DOI: 10.1097/00004424-199101000-00013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Invest Radiol        ISSN: 0020-9996            Impact factor:   6.016


  17 in total

1.  Length and angle measurements of the lower extremity in digital composite overview images.

Authors:  M Boewer; H Arndt; P A W Ostermann; J Petersein; S Mutze
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2004-05-26       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Improved accuracy of component alignment with the implementation of image-free navigation in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Ralf E Rosenberger; Christian Hoser; Sebastian Quirbach; Rene Attal; Alfred Hennerbichler; Christian Fink
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2007-12-22       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Agreement between radiological and computer navigation measurement of lower limb alignment.

Authors:  Julian Dexel; Stephan Kirschner; Klaus-Peter Günther; Jörg Lützner
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-07-06       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Frontal knee alignment: three-dimensional marker positions and clinical assessment.

Authors:  Benedicte Vanwanseele; David Parker; Myles Coolican
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-10-08       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Radiographic and navigation measurements of TKA limb alignment do not correlate.

Authors:  Mark A Yaffe; Samuel S Koo; S David Stulberg
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Single-radius, multidirectional total knee replacement.

Authors:  Jean-Yves Jenny; Rolf Miehlke; Dominique Saragaglia; Robert Geyer; Numa Mercier; Jean-Yves Schoenahl; Birger Thiel
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-08-28       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 7.  Quantitative radiography of osteoarthritis.

Authors:  J C Buckland-Wright
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 19.103

8.  Association between knee alignment and knee pain in patients surgically treated for medial knee osteoarthritis by high tibial osteotomy. A one year follow-up study.

Authors:  Annette W-Dahl; Sören Toksvig-Larsen; Ewa M Roos
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2009-12-08       Impact factor: 2.362

9.  A comparison of five approaches to measurement of anatomic knee alignment from radiographs.

Authors:  G McDaniel; K L Mitchell; C Charles; V B Kraus
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2009-10-24       Impact factor: 6.576

10.  The measurement of medial knee gap width using ultrasound.

Authors:  Laura C Slane; Josh A Slane; Lennart Scheys
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2017-07-04       Impact factor: 3.067

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.