Literature DB >> 20224514

Cost-effectiveness analysis of individualized mycophenolate mofetil dosing in kidney transplant patients in the APOMYGRE trial.

Annick Rousseau1, Marie-Laure Laroche, Nicolas Venisse, Cecile Loichot-Roselmac, Alain Turcant, Guillaume Hoizey, Patricia Compagnon, Lionel Hary, Danièle Debruyne, Sylvie Saivin, Evelyne Jacqz-Aigrain, Mathias Buchler, Claire Villeneuve, Alain Vergnenègre, Yannick Le Meur, Pierre Marquet.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In the prospective, randomized, multicenter APOMYGRE trial conducted in France, concentration-controlled mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) dosing based on mycophenolic acid (MPA) exposure significantly reduced the treatment failure and acute rejection during the first posttransplantation year compared with fixed-dose MMF. This analysis investigated the cost effectiveness of dose individualization.
METHOD: The study included 65 patients per group (intent-to-treat population). Treatment failure (primary efficacy endpoint) was defined as death, graft loss, acute rejection, or MMF discontinuation because of adverse effects. Data on hospitalizations, drugs prescribed, physicians' fees, laboratory expenses, ambulatory visits, and transportation were retrieved. Costs were calculated from the French National Health System perspective.
RESULTS: The mean (95% confidence interval) total yearly cost per patient was Euro 47,477 (Euro 43,933; Euro 51,020) in the concentration-controlled group and Euro 46,783 ( Euro 44,152; Euro 49,414) in the fixed-dose group (P=0.7). The observed incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was Euro 3757 per treatment failure (Purchasing Power Parities United States/France: $4129). Hospitalization and drug costs accounted for approximately 50% and 25% of total costs, respectively. The cost for MPA area under the concentration-time curve and dose calculation was Euro 452 per patient, less than 1% of the total cost.
CONCLUSION: In the APOMYGRE trial, therapeutic MPA monitoring using a limited sampling strategy reduced the risk of treatment failure and acute rejection in renal allograft recipients during the first 12 months posttransplantation, at neutral cost.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20224514     DOI: 10.1097/TP.0b013e3181d75952

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transplantation        ISSN: 0041-1337            Impact factor:   4.939


  5 in total

1.  Population pharmacokinetics of mycophenolic acid in lung transplant recipients with and without cystic fibrosis.

Authors:  Xiao-Xing Wang; Meihua R Feng; Hugh Nguyen; David E Smith; Diane M Cibrik; Jeong M Park
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2015-05-07       Impact factor: 2.953

2.  Nonlinear relationship between mycophenolate mofetil dose and mycophenolic acid exposure: implications for therapeutic drug monitoring.

Authors:  Brenda C M de Winter; Ron A A Mathot; Ferdi Sombogaard; Arnold G Vulto; Teun van Gelder
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2010-11-18       Impact factor: 8.237

Review 3.  Paediatric use of mycophenolate mofetil.

Authors:  Heather J Downing; Munir Pirmohamed; Michael W Beresford; Rosalind L Smyth
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 4.335

4.  Nonlinear relationship between enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium dose and mycophenolic acid exposure in Han kidney transplantation recipients.

Authors:  Jun Zhang; Mengmeng Jia; Lihua Zuo; Na Li; Yonggang Luo; Zhi Sun; Xiaojian Zhang; Zhenfeng Zhu
Journal:  Acta Pharm Sin B       Date:  2016-12-10       Impact factor: 11.413

Review 5.  Optimizing Mycophenolic Acid Exposure in Kidney Transplant Recipients: Time for Target Concentration Intervention.

Authors:  David K Metz; Nick Holford; Joshua Y Kausman; Amanda Walker; Noel Cranswick; Christine E Staatz; Katherine A Barraclough; Francesco Ierino
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 4.939

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.