Literature DB >> 20224277

Morphological and histochemical observations on the crural gland-spur apparatus of the echidna (Tachyglossus aculeatus) together with comparative observations on the femoral gland-spur apparatus of the duckbilled platypus (Ornithorhyncus anatinus).

William J Krause1.   

Abstract

The echidna and platypus have a crural/femoral gland that is linked by a large duct to a canalized, keratinous spur located on the medial side of the ankle. The echidna crural gland, like the femoral gland of the platypus, exhibits cyclic activity, being prominent in both monotremes when they are sexually active. In the present study, we compared the structure and histochemistry of these glands. During the active phase, the secretory epithelium forming the respective glands of both species increased in height and became packed with secretory granules that differed markedly in structure. Secretory granules of the echidna crural gland were electron dense and characterized by cores or areas of increased electron density. Those of the platypus were initially electron dense, but then became less dense and coalesced into irregular complexes of secretory material. Large cytoplasmic blebs extended from epithelial cell apices and appeared to be shed into the lumen, resulting in an apocrine mode of secretion. Exocytosis was also observed. A similar form of release of secretory product was not observed in the echidna. Secretory granules of both species were periodic acid-Schiff positive and stained for protein, suggesting that much of the secretory product was glycoprotein. Myoepithelial cells enveloped the secretory tubules of the platypus femoral gland, whereas they were not observed surrounding tubules comprising the echidna crural gland. During the quiescent phase, the epithelial cells of both species lost their secretory granules and decreased in height. As a result, the secretory tubules became smaller, intralobular connective tissue increased and the glands decreased in overall size.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20224277     DOI: 10.1159/000252802

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cells Tissues Organs        ISSN: 1422-6405            Impact factor:   2.481


  6 in total

1.  Proteomics and deep sequencing comparison of seasonally active venom glands in the platypus reveals novel venom peptides and distinct expression profiles.

Authors:  Emily S W Wong; David Morgenstern; Ehtesham Mofiz; Sara Gombert; Katrina M Morris; Peter Temple-Smith; Marilyn B Renfree; Camilla M Whittington; Glenn F King; Wesley C Warren; Anthony T Papenfuss; Katherine Belov
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2012-08-16       Impact factor: 5.911

2.  A Spur to Atavism: Placing Platypus Poison.

Authors:  Peter Hobbins
Journal:  J Hist Biol       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 1.326

3.  Convergent evolution of venom gland transcriptomes across Metazoa.

Authors:  Giulia Zancolli; Maarten Reijnders; Robert M Waterhouse; Marc Robinson-Rechavi
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2022-01-04       Impact factor: 12.779

4.  A non-lethal method for studying scorpion venom gland transcriptomes, with a review of potentially suitable taxa to which it can be applied.

Authors:  Freek J Vonk; Mátyás A Bittenbinder; Harald M I Kerkkamp; Dwin G B Grashof; John P Archer; Sandra Afonso; Michael K Richardson; Jeroen Kool; Arie van der Meijden
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-11-18       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Echidna venom gland transcriptome provides insights into the evolution of monotreme venom.

Authors:  Emily S W Wong; Stewart Nicol; Wesley C Warren; Katherine Belov
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-11-12       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 6.  Tracing monotreme venom evolution in the genomics era.

Authors:  Camilla M Whittington; Katherine Belov
Journal:  Toxins (Basel)       Date:  2014-04-02       Impact factor: 4.546

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.