BACKGROUND: Shoulder movement impairment is a commonly reported consequence of surgery for breast cancer. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine whether shoulder girdle kinematics, including those of the scapula, spine, and upper limb, in women who have undergone a unilateral mastectomy for breast cancer are different from those demonstrated by an age-matched control group. DESIGN: An observational study using 3-dimensional kinematic analysis was performed. METHODS: Women who had a unilateral mastectomy on their dominant-arm side (n=29, mean [+/-SD] age=62.4+/-8.9 years) or nondominant-arm side (n=24, mean [+/-SD] age=59.8+/-9.9 years), as well as a control group of age-matched women without upper-limb, shoulder, or spinal problems (n=22, mean [+/-SD] age=58.1+/-11.5 years), were measured while performing bilateral arm movements in the sagittal, scapular, and coronal planes. All of the women were free of shoulder pain at the time of testing. Data were collected from the glenohumeral joint, the scapulothoracic articulation, and the spine (upper and lower thoracic and lumbar regions) using an electromagnetic tracking system. RESULTS: Women following mastectomy displayed altered patterns of scapular rotation compared with controls in all planes of movement. In particular, the scapula on the mastectomy side rotated upward to a markedly greater extent than that on the nonmastectomy side, and women following mastectomy displayed greater scapular excursion than controls. CONCLUSIONS: The findings suggest that altered motor patterns of the scapula are associated with mastectomy on the same side. Whether these changes are harmful or not is unclear. Investigation of interventions designed to restore normal scapulohumeral relationships on the affected side following unilateral mastectomy for breast cancer is warranted.
BACKGROUND: Shoulder movement impairment is a commonly reported consequence of surgery for breast cancer. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine whether shoulder girdle kinematics, including those of the scapula, spine, and upper limb, in women who have undergone a unilateral mastectomy for breast cancer are different from those demonstrated by an age-matched control group. DESIGN: An observational study using 3-dimensional kinematic analysis was performed. METHODS:Women who had a unilateral mastectomy on their dominant-arm side (n=29, mean [+/-SD] age=62.4+/-8.9 years) or nondominant-arm side (n=24, mean [+/-SD] age=59.8+/-9.9 years), as well as a control group of age-matched women without upper-limb, shoulder, or spinal problems (n=22, mean [+/-SD] age=58.1+/-11.5 years), were measured while performing bilateral arm movements in the sagittal, scapular, and coronal planes. All of the women were free of shoulder pain at the time of testing. Data were collected from the glenohumeral joint, the scapulothoracic articulation, and the spine (upper and lower thoracic and lumbar regions) using an electromagnetic tracking system. RESULTS:Women following mastectomy displayed altered patterns of scapular rotation compared with controls in all planes of movement. In particular, the scapula on the mastectomy side rotated upward to a markedly greater extent than that on the nonmastectomy side, and women following mastectomy displayed greater scapular excursion than controls. CONCLUSIONS: The findings suggest that altered motor patterns of the scapula are associated with mastectomy on the same side. Whether these changes are harmful or not is unclear. Investigation of interventions designed to restore normal scapulohumeral relationships on the affected side following unilateral mastectomy for breast cancer is warranted.
Authors: Shana Harrington; Darin Padua; Claudio Battaglini; Lori A Michener; Carol Giuliani; Joseph Myers; Diane Groff Journal: J Cancer Surviv Date: 2011-01-12 Impact factor: 4.442
Authors: An De Groef; Marijke Van Kampen; Nele Verlvoesem; Evi Dieltjens; Lore Vos; Tessa De Vrieze; Marie-Rose Christiaens; Patrick Neven; Inge Geraerts; Nele Devoogdt Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2017-02-14 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Iwona Głowacka; Tomasz Nowikiewicz; Zygmunt Siedlecki; Wojciech Hagner; Krystyna Nowacka; Wojciech Zegarski Journal: Pathol Oncol Res Date: 2015-10-28 Impact factor: 3.201
Authors: Irene de la Rosa Díaz; María Torres Lacomba; Ester Cerezo Téllez; Cristina Díaz Del Campo Gómez-Rico; Carlos Gutiérrez Ortega Journal: J Chiropr Med Date: 2016-11-23
Authors: Seoyon Yang; Dae Hwan Park; Sei Hyun Ahn; Jisun Kim; Jong Won Lee; Jun Young Han; Dong Kyu Kim; Jae Yong Jeon; Kyoung Hyo Choi; Won Kim Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2016-12-09 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Annette Loudon; Tony Barnett; Neil Piller; Maarten A Immink; Denis Visentin; Andrew D Williams Journal: BMC Complement Altern Med Date: 2012-05-28 Impact factor: 3.659