Literature DB >> 20223647

Public opinion and awareness towards MSW and separate collection programmes: a sociological procedure for selecting areas and citizens with a low level of knowledge.

Giovanni De Feo1, Sabino De Gisi.   

Abstract

The principal aim of this study was to define and apply a procedure based on a structured questionnaire survey useful to analyze the people's environmental knowledge in order to select the areas and age groups with a low level of knowledge in a municipality (in Southern Italy) and, therefore, suggest a specific educational campaign for each. The detailed sampling procedure made it possible to carry out a meticulous statistical analysis of the results. The youngest and oldest people showed the lowest level of awareness for each district. A high level of education did not necessarily imply a high level of environmental awareness as well as a greater acceptance of MSW facilities. The satisfaction level of the recycling program was higher amongst the oldest age group. All the citizens in the several areas were unanimous in pointing out the presence of dirt in the street as the main shortcoming of the bring separate collection program. Only the youngest age group self-criticised, considering that they revealed a low level of participation to the separate collection program. While, the oldest people retaining them less influential, claimed that the citizens were not responsible for the failure of the separate collection program. The prevailing opinion of the sample was that people protested against the construction of waste facilities because they were not well-informed, with the most significant opinion of all the age subdivisions being that incineration is a hazardous treatment. The presence of criminal organizations was indicated as the main reason why the Campania Region suffers a serious solid waste emergency. While, the percentage of people pointing their finger at politicians increases with the average age of the respondents with there being a very strong correlation (r(2)=0.9903). Copyright 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20223647     DOI: 10.1016/j.wasman.2010.02.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Waste Manag        ISSN: 0956-053X            Impact factor:   7.145


  5 in total

1.  Geochemical survey of an illegal waste disposal site under a waste emergency scenario (Northwest Naples, Italy).

Authors:  L Ferrara; M Iannace; A M Patelli; M Arienzo
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2012-07-06       Impact factor: 2.513

2.  An evaluation of the social dimensions in public participation in rural domestic waste source-separated collection in Guilin, China.

Authors:  Jing Ma; Keith W Hipel; Mark L Hanson
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2017-12-21       Impact factor: 2.513

Review 3.  A critical review of household recycling barriers in the United Kingdom.

Authors:  Saeed Oluwadipe; Hemda Garelick; Simon McCarthy; Diane Purchase
Journal:  Waste Manag Res       Date:  2021-11-20

Review 4.  Environmental pollution from illegal waste disposal and health effects: a review on the "triangle of death".

Authors:  Maria Triassi; Rossella Alfano; Maddalena Illario; Antonio Nardone; Oreste Caporale; Paolo Montuori
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2015-01-22       Impact factor: 3.390

5.  Feasibility study of the unit pricing system for household wastes sorting in the context of China.

Authors:  Wenhua Li; Juntao Wang
Journal:  Waste Manag Res       Date:  2021-02-08
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.