Literature DB >> 20223578

Rescuer fatigue and cardiopulmonary resuscitation positions: A randomized controlled crossover trial.

Ning-Ping Foo1, Jer-Hao Chang, Hung-Jung Lin, How-Ran Guo.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: During cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), it is recommended to alternate rescuers every 2 min when two or more rescuers are available, regardless of the rescuer's position. It is unclear, however, whether rescuer fatigue depends on the rescuer's position.
PURPOSE: To compare rescuer fatigue by doing CPR in different positions.
METHODS: This randomized controlled crossover trial studied 24 experienced health-care providers from a teaching hospital in southern Taiwan. Each participant performed CPR for 10 min on days 1, 8, and 15 of the study in three different positions: kneeling, standing on a taboret, and standing on the floor. Effective compression was recorded using the Laerdal Resusci-Anne Skillreporter manikin. The range of motion (ROM) of the elbows and lower back were detected using a flexible goniometer, and the severity of back pain was scored using the Brief Pain Inventory short-form.
RESULTS: Rescuers maintained adequate effective compressions for 2 min while kneeling and standing on a taboret, but only for 1 min while standing on the floor. The ROM for elbows and lower back during CPR while kneeling were significantly lower than for standing on the floor. Moreover, the total pain (p<0.001) and social interference (p=0.004) scores 24h after CPR were significantly lower for the kneeling position.
CONCLUSIONS: CPR is best performed in a kneeling position. In order to minimize rescuer fatigue, we recommend alternating rescuers every 2 min while kneeling or standing on a taboret, and every 1 min while standing on the floor. Copyright 2010 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20223578     DOI: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2010.02.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Resuscitation        ISSN: 0300-9572            Impact factor:   5.262


  6 in total

1.  Relationship between weight of rescuer and quality of chest compression during cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

Authors:  Tomoyuki Hasegawa; Rie Daikoku; Shin Saito; Yayoi Saito
Journal:  J Physiol Anthropol       Date:  2014-06-24       Impact factor: 2.867

2.  Team Size and Stretching-Exercise Effects on Simulated Chest Compression Performance and Exertion.

Authors:  Jessica C Schoen; Jason T Machan; Max Dannecker; Leo Kobayashi
Journal:  West J Emerg Med       Date:  2017-09-11

3.  Up-down hand position switch may delay the fatigue of non-dominant hand position rescuers and improve chest compression quality during cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a randomized crossover manikin study.

Authors:  Xian-Long Zhou; Lei Li; Cheng Jiang; Bing Xu; Huang-Lei Wang; Dan Xiong; Li-Pin Sheng; Qi-Sheng Yang; Shan Jiang; Peng Xu; Zhi-Qiao Chen; Yan Zhao
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-08-12       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Effect of knee positions on cardiac compression variables in cardiopulmonary resuscitation of rescuer; Manikin study.

Authors:  Seung-Hyun Hyun; Jong-Hee Han; Che-Cheong Ryew
Journal:  J Exerc Rehabil       Date:  2018-06-30

5.  Effect of Ambulance Stretcher Bed Height Adjustment on CPR Quality and Rescuer Fatigue in a Laboratory Environment.

Authors:  Chun-Sheng Ho; Yi-Ju Hsu; Fang Li; Chien-Ching Tang; Cheng-Pang Yang; Chi-Chang Huang; Chin-Shan Ho; Chun-Hao Chang
Journal:  Int J Med Sci       Date:  2021-05-27       Impact factor: 3.738

6.  Computed tomographic findings of chest injuries following cardiopulmonary resuscitation: More complications for prolonged chest compressions?

Authors:  Seo Jin Jang; Yoon Ki Cha; Jeung Sook Kim; Han Ho Do; So Hyeon Bak; Won Gun Kwack
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-08-14       Impact factor: 1.817

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.