Literature DB >> 20223396

Prospective comparison of emergency physician-performed venous ultrasound and CT venography for deep venous thrombosis.

Stephen A Shiver1, Matthew Lyon, Michael Blaivas, Srikar Adhikari.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Venous thromboembolic disease is a major cause of mortality and morbidity.
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study is to compare emergency physician-performed ultrasound (EPPU) of the lower extremities with CT venography (CTV) in emergency department (ED) patients undergoing workup for pulmonary embolism (PE).
METHODS: This was a prospective study performed at a busy academic ED. Adult patients (>18) undergoing workup for PE were eligible for the study; enrollment was based on a convenience sample, during hours worked by the investigators. Study patients underwent EPPU of the lower extremities followed by CT angiogram (CTA) of the chest and CTV of the lower extremities. Sensitivity and specificity of the ultrasound examination were calculated using CTV as the gold standard.
RESULTS: A total of 61 patients were enrolled. Of 61 patients, 50 (82%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 72%-91%) had negative workups; 11 (18%; 95% CI, 8%-27%) were noted to have PE on CTA; 6 (10%; 95% CI, 2%-17%) were noted to have lower extremity deep venous thrombosis (DVT) on both EPPU and CTV evaluation; whereas 1 patient was found to have an external iliac DVT on CTV, which was not noted on EPPU. All patients with DVT (by either EPPU or CTV) were found to have PE on CTA. Sensitivity and specificity of EPPU when compared to CTV in the diagnosis of DVT was 86% (95% CI, 42%-99%) and 100% (95% CI, 91%-100%), respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Emergency physician-performed ultrasound produces results consistent with CTV in the diagnosis of femoropopliteal DVT. More proximal clots are not evaluated with EPPU and thus may result in a false negative. 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20223396     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajem.2009.01.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Emerg Med        ISSN: 0735-6757            Impact factor:   2.469


  6 in total

1.  Knowledge of point-of-care ultrasound and management of deep vein thrombosis patient in resource limited setup: A case report.

Authors:  Sachhyatkar Bista; Sabin Rajbhandari; Saurab Karki; Subashchandra Pokharel; Sudesha Karki
Journal:  Ann Med Surg (Lond)       Date:  2022-04-29

2.  Venous thromboembolism in major trauma patients: a single-center retrospective cohort study of the epidemiology and utility of D-dimer for screening.

Authors:  Tetsuya Yumoto; Hiromichi Naito; Yasuaki Yamakawa; Atsuyoshi Iida; Kohei Tsukahara; Atsunori Nakao
Journal:  Acute Med Surg       Date:  2017-06-19

3.  Comparison of 2-point and 3-point point-of-care ultrasound techniques for deep vein thrombosis at the emergency department: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ju Hyung Lee; Sun Hwa Lee; Seong Jong Yun
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 1.817

4.  Diagnostic Accuracy of a Three-point Compression Ultrasonography Performed by Emergency Medicine Resident for the Diagnosis of Deep Vein Thrombosis: a Prospective Diagnostic Study.

Authors:  Fatemeh Jahanian; Iraj Goli Khatir; Elham-Sadat Bani-Mostafavi; Siavash Moradi; Fatemeh Hosseini Aghamalaki
Journal:  Acta Inform Med       Date:  2019-06

5.  Multiorgan Ultrasonography for the Diagnosis of Pulmonary Embolism.

Authors:  Zouheir Bitar; Ossama Maadarani; Mohamad Abdelfatah; Hadeel Alothman; Adnan Hajjiah
Journal:  Eur J Case Rep Intern Med       Date:  2022-03-30

6.  Mistakes and Pitfalls Associated with Two-Point Compression Ultrasound for Deep Vein Thrombosis.

Authors:  Tony Zitek; Jamie Baydoun; Salvador Yepez; Wesley Forred; David E Slattery
Journal:  West J Emerg Med       Date:  2016-03-02
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.