Literature DB >> 20222829

Rehabilitation outcomes: values, methodologies and applications.

Kathryn M McPherson1, William J Taylor, Alain Leplege.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Just what defines a 'good' outcome in rehabilitation has been a much-debated issue. Indeed, this question remains a major focus in research, clinical practice and policy (with funding in many countries now being linked to outcomes achieved rather than outputs or services provided). Despite this rather constant attention, complexity, contention and confusion remain.
PURPOSE: This special issue presents 10 papers that take a fresh look at some of the long-standing problems concerning rehabilitation outcomes and, proposes novel ways to reconsider things and move forward.
RESULTS: In this article, we provide a brief commentary on key issues raised by authors all of which focus on one or more of the following three key themes: the place of values in selecting and targeting outcomes; novel methodologies that may usefully inform measurement of outcome and finally; application of the thinking about outcomes in specific examples.
CONCLUSION: The papers in this special issue address a number of key issues concerning the evaluation of outcomes in rehabilitation. In so doing, some of the prevalent assumptions underpinning common approaches are questioned and novel ways forward are proposed.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20222829     DOI: 10.3109/09638281003672393

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Disabil Rehabil        ISSN: 0963-8288            Impact factor:   3.033


  1 in total

1.  Talking about the institutional complexity of the integrated rehabilitation system-the importance of coordination.

Authors:  Sari Miettinen; Ulla Ashorn; Juhani Lehto
Journal:  Int J Integr Care       Date:  2013-03-22       Impact factor: 5.120

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.