Literature DB >> 20222755

Cost effectiveness of etoricoxib versus celecoxib and non-selective NSAIDS in the treatment of ankylosing spondylitis.

Jeroen P Jansen1, Sabine Gaugris, Ernest H Choy, Andrew Ostor, Julian T Nash, Wiro Stam.   

Abstract

To evaluate the cost effectiveness of etoricoxib (90 mg/day) relative to celecoxib (200 or 400 mg/day), and the non-selective NSAIDs naproxen (1000 mg/day) and diclofenac (150 mg/day) in the initial treatment of ankylosing spondylitis (AS) from the UK NHS perspective. A Bayesian cost-effectiveness model was developed to estimate the costs and benefits associated with initiating AS treatment with etoricoxib, celecoxib, diclofenac or naproxen. Efficacy, safety and medical resource and cost data were obtained from the literature. The obtained efficacy estimates were synthesized with a mixed treatment comparison meta-analysis. Treatment benefit and degree of disease activity, as reflected with Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI) and Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) scores, were related to QALYs and AS-specific costs (related to BASDAI). Other cost outcomes related to drug acquisition, and gastrointestinal and cardiovascular safety. Uncertainty in the source data was translated into uncertainty in cost-effectiveness estimates and therefore decision uncertainty. Costs and outcomes were discounted at 3.5% per annum. There was a >98% probability that treatment with etoricoxib results in greater QALYs than the other interventions. Over a 30-year time horizon, starting AS treatment with etoricoxib was associated with about 0.4 more QALYs than the other interventions. At 2 years there was a 77% probability that etoricoxib had the lowest cost. This increased to >99% at 30 years. Etoricoxib is expected to save 13 620 UK pounds (year 2007 values) relative to celecoxib (200/400 mg), 9957 UK pounds relative to diclofenac and 9863 UK pounds relative to naproxen. For a willingness-to-pay ceiling ratio of 20 000 UK pounds per QALY, there was a >97% probability that etoricoxib was the most cost-effective treatment. Additional analysis with different assumptions, including celecoxib 200 mg, and ignoring cost-offsets associated with improvements in disease activity, supported these findings. This economic evaluation suggests that, from the UK NHS perspective, etoricoxib is the most cost-effective initial NSAID treatment for AS patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20222755     DOI: 10.2165/11314690-000000000-00000

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics        ISSN: 1170-7690            Impact factor:   4.981


  52 in total

Review 1.  New treatment options in ankylosing spondylitis: a role for anti-TNFalpha therapy.

Authors:  J Sieper; J Braun
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 19.103

2.  Prevalence of spondyloarthropathies in France: 2001.

Authors:  A Saraux; F Guillemin; P Guggenbuhl; C H Roux; P Fardellone; E Le Bihan; A Cantagrel; I Chary-Valckenaere; L Euller-Ziegler; R-M Flipo; R Juvin; J-M Behier; B Fautrel; C Masson; J Coste
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2005-04-07       Impact factor: 19.103

3.  Analysis of the costs of NSAID-associated gastropathy. Experience in a US health maintenance organisation.

Authors:  R E Johnson; M C Hornbrook; R S Hooker; G T Woodson; R Shneidman
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 4.981

4.  Excess costs from gastrointestinal disease associated with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs.

Authors:  W E Smalley; M R Griffin; R L Fought; W A Ray
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 5.128

5.  Gastrointestinal toxicity with celecoxib vs nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis: the CLASS study: A randomized controlled trial. Celecoxib Long-term Arthritis Safety Study.

Authors:  F E Silverstein; G Faich; J L Goldstein; L S Simon; T Pincus; A Whelton; R Makuch; G Eisen; N M Agrawal; W F Stenson; A M Burr; W W Zhao; J D Kent; J B Lefkowith; K M Verburg; G S Geis
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2000-09-13       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  The incidence of upper gastrointestinal adverse events in clinical trials of etoricoxib vs. non-selective NSAIDs: an updated combined analysis.

Authors:  Dena R Ramey; Douglas J Watson; Chang Yu; James A Bolognese; Sean P Curtis; Alise S Reicin
Journal:  Curr Med Res Opin       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 2.580

7.  The cost-effectiveness of misoprostol in preventing serious gastrointestinal events associated with the use of nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs.

Authors:  A Maetzel; M B Ferraz; C Bombardier
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  1998-01

8.  Complementary studies of the gastrointestinal safety of the cyclo-oxygenase-2-selective inhibitor etoricoxib.

Authors:  R H Hunt; S Harper; P Callegari; C Yu; H Quan; J Evans; C James; B Bowen; F Rashid
Journal:  Aliment Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 8.171

9.  A new approach to defining functional ability in ankylosing spondylitis: the development of the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index.

Authors:  A Calin; S Garrett; H Whitelock; L G Kennedy; J O'Hea; P Mallorie; T Jenkinson
Journal:  J Rheumatol       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 4.666

10.  Cost effectiveness of adalimumab for the treatment of ankylosing spondylitis in the United Kingdom.

Authors:  M F Botteman; J W Hay; M P Luo; A S Curry; R L Wong; B A van Hout
Journal:  Rheumatology (Oxford)       Date:  2007-06-02       Impact factor: 7.580

View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  Cost effectiveness of therapeutic interventions in ankylosing spondylitis: a critical and systematic review.

Authors:  Cécile Gaujoux-Viala; Bruno Fautrel
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2012-12-01       Impact factor: 4.981

2.  Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation of Etoricoxib versus Celecoxib and Nonselective NSAIDs in the Treatment of Ankylosing Spondylitis in Norway.

Authors:  Jeroen P Jansen; Stephanie D Taylor
Journal:  Int J Rheumatol       Date:  2011-06-24

3.  Cost-Effectiveness of Golimumab in Ankylosing Spondylitis from the UK Payer Perspective.

Authors:  Rebekah H Borse; Chloe Brown; Noemi Muszbek; Mohammad Ashraf Chaudhary; Sumesh Kachroo
Journal:  Rheumatol Ther       Date:  2017-09-27

4.  DWI and SPARCC scoring assess curative effect of early ankylosing spondylitis.

Authors:  Jian Qin; Jianzhong Zhu; Yue Zhang; Changqin Li
Journal:  Open Med (Wars)       Date:  2016-03-10

Review 5.  Status of etoricoxib in the treatment of rheumatic diseases. Expert panel opinion.

Authors:  Brygida Kwiatkowska; Maria Majdan; Agnieszka Mastalerz-Migas; Maciej Niewada; Barbara Skrzydło-Radomańska; Artur Mamcarz
Journal:  Reumatologia       Date:  2017-12-30

6.  Clinical application of diffusion-weighted imaging and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in assessing the clinical curative effect of early ankylosing spondylitis.

Authors:  Zhaojuan Shi; Jiankui Han; Jian Qin; Yue Zhang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 1.817

7.  A comparative study of aceclofenac versus etoricoxib in the management of acute low back pain in a tertiary care hospital.

Authors:  Hema Jagannathan; Amulya Thota; Ashok Kumar B Kumarappa; Githa Kishore
Journal:  J Drug Assess       Date:  2020-03-31
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.