BACKGROUND: After resuscitation, asphyxiated neonates often develop poor cardiac function with hypotension, pulmonary hypertension and multiorgan ischemia. In a swine model of neonatal hypoxia-reoxygenation, effects of epinephrine, dobutamine and milrinone on systemic, pulmonary and regional hemodynamics and oxygen transport were compared. DESIGN: Controlled, block-randomized study. SETTING: University research laboratory. SUBJECT: Mixed breed piglets (1-3 days, 1.5-2.3 kg). INTERVENTIONS: In acutely instrumented piglets, normocapnic alveolar hypoxia (10-15% oxygen) was induced for 2 h followed by reoxygenation with 100% oxygen (1 h) then 21% oxygen (3 h). At 2 h of reoxygenation, after volume loading (Ringer's lactate 10 ml/kg), either saline (placebo), epinephrine (0.5 microg/kg/min), dobutamine (20 microg/kg/min) or milrinone (0.75 microg/kg/min) were infused for 2 h in a blinded, block-randomized fashion (n = 6/group). MAIN RESULTS: All medications similarly improved cardiac output, stroke volume and systemic oxygen delivery (vs. placebo-controls, p < 0.05). Epinephrine and dobutamine significantly increased, while milrinone maintained, mean arterial pressure over pretreatment values while placebo-treated piglets developed hypotension and shock. The mean arterial to pulmonary arterial pressures ratio was not different among groups. All medications significantly increased carotid and intestinal, but not renal, arterial blood flows and oxygen delivery, whereas milrinone caused lower renal vascular resistance than epinephrine and dobutamine-treated groups. Plasma troponin I, plasma and myocardial lactate levels, and histologic ischemic features were not different among groups. CONCLUSIONS: In newborn piglets with hypoxia-reoxygenation, epinephrine, dobutamine and milrinone are effective inotropes to improve cardiac output, carotid and intestinal perfusion, without aggravating pulmonary hypertension. Milrinone may also improve renal perfusion.
BACKGROUND: After resuscitation, asphyxiated neonates often develop poor cardiac function with hypotension, pulmonary hypertension and multiorgan ischemia. In a swine model of neonatal hypoxia-reoxygenation, effects of epinephrine, dobutamine and milrinone on systemic, pulmonary and regional hemodynamics and oxygen transport were compared. DESIGN: Controlled, block-randomized study. SETTING: University research laboratory. SUBJECT: Mixed breed piglets (1-3 days, 1.5-2.3 kg). INTERVENTIONS: In acutely instrumented piglets, normocapnic alveolar hypoxia (10-15% oxygen) was induced for 2 h followed by reoxygenation with 100% oxygen (1 h) then 21% oxygen (3 h). At 2 h of reoxygenation, after volume loading (Ringer's lactate 10 ml/kg), either saline (placebo), epinephrine (0.5 microg/kg/min), dobutamine (20 microg/kg/min) or milrinone (0.75 microg/kg/min) were infused for 2 h in a blinded, block-randomized fashion (n = 6/group). MAIN RESULTS: All medications similarly improved cardiac output, stroke volume and systemic oxygen delivery (vs. placebo-controls, p < 0.05). Epinephrine and dobutamine significantly increased, while milrinone maintained, mean arterial pressure over pretreatment values while placebo-treated piglets developed hypotension and shock. The mean arterial to pulmonary arterial pressures ratio was not different among groups. All medications significantly increased carotid and intestinal, but not renal, arterial blood flows and oxygen delivery, whereas milrinone caused lower renal vascular resistance than epinephrine and dobutamine-treated groups. Plasma troponin I, plasma and myocardial lactate levels, and histologic ischemic features were not different among groups. CONCLUSIONS: In newborn piglets with hypoxia-reoxygenation, epinephrine, dobutamine and milrinone are effective inotropes to improve cardiac output, carotid and intestinal perfusion, without aggravating pulmonary hypertension. Milrinone may also improve renal perfusion.
Authors: L Bennet; L Booth; S C Malpas; J S Quaedackers; E Jensen; J Dean; A J Gunn Journal: Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol Date: 2006-04 Impact factor: 2.557
Authors: J Caspi; J G Coles; L N Benson; S L Herman; R J Diaz; J Augustine; A Brezina; A Kolin; G J Wilson Journal: Circulation Date: 1991-11 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Adelina Pellicer; Eva Valverde; María Dolores Elorza; Rosario Madero; Francisco Gayá; José Quero; Fernando Cabañas Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2005-06 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Erika Haase; David L Bigam; Quentin B Nakonechny; Laurence D Jewell; Gregory Korbutt; Po-Yin Cheung Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2004-08 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Massimo Antonelli; Elie Azoulay; Marc Bonten; Jean Chastre; Giuseppe Citerio; Giorgio Conti; Daniel De Backer; Herwig Gerlach; Goran Hedenstierna; Michael Joannidis; Duncan Macrae; Jordi Mancebo; Salvatore M Maggiore; Alexandre Mebazaa; Jean-Charles Preiser; Jerôme Pugin; Jan Wernerman; Haibo Zhang Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2011-01-04 Impact factor: 17.440