Literature DB >> 20220843

Confirmation of general relativity on large scales from weak lensing and galaxy velocities.

Reinabelle Reyes1, Rachel Mandelbaum, Uros Seljak, Tobias Baldauf, James E Gunn, Lucas Lombriser, Robert E Smith.   

Abstract

Although general relativity underlies modern cosmology, its applicability on cosmological length scales has yet to be stringently tested. Such a test has recently been proposed, using a quantity, E(G), that combines measures of large-scale gravitational lensing, galaxy clustering and structure growth rate. The combination is insensitive to 'galaxy bias' (the difference between the clustering of visible galaxies and invisible dark matter) and is thus robust to the uncertainty in this parameter. Modified theories of gravity generally predict values of E(G) different from the general relativistic prediction because, in these theories, the 'gravitational slip' (the difference between the two potentials that describe perturbations in the gravitational metric) is non-zero, which leads to changes in the growth of structure and the strength of the gravitational lensing effect. Here we report that E(G) = 0.39 +/- 0.06 on length scales of tens of megaparsecs, in agreement with the general relativistic prediction of E(G) approximately 0.4. The measured value excludes a model within the tensor-vector-scalar gravity theory, which modifies both Newtonian and Einstein gravity. However, the relatively large uncertainty still permits models within f(R) theory, which is an extension of general relativity. A fivefold decrease in uncertainty is needed to rule out these models.

Entities:  

Year:  2010        PMID: 20220843     DOI: 10.1038/nature08857

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nature        ISSN: 0028-0836            Impact factor:   49.962


  3 in total

1.  Probing gravity at cosmological scales by measurements which test the relationship between gravitational lensing and matter overdensity.

Authors:  Pengjie Zhang; Michele Liguori; Rachel Bean; Scott Dodelson
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2007-10-04       Impact factor: 9.161

2.  A test of the nature of cosmic acceleration using galaxy redshift distortions.

Authors:  L Guzzo; M Pierleoni; B Meneux; E Branchini; O Le Fèvre; C Marinoni; B Garilli; J Blaizot; G De Lucia; A Pollo; H J McCracken; D Bottini; V Le Brun; D Maccagni; J P Picat; R Scaramella; M Scodeggio; L Tresse; G Vettolani; A Zanichelli; C Adami; S Arnouts; S Bardelli; M Bolzonella; A Bongiorno; A Cappi; S Charlot; P Ciliegi; T Contini; O Cucciati; S de la Torre; K Dolag; S Foucaud; P Franzetti; I Gavignaud; O Ilbert; A Iovino; F Lamareille; B Marano; A Mazure; P Memeo; R Merighi; L Moscardini; S Paltani; R Pellò; E Perez-Montero; L Pozzetti; M Radovich; D Vergani; G Zamorani; E Zucca
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2008-01-31       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Einstein's theory of gravity and the problem of missing mass.

Authors:  Pedro G Ferreira; Glenn D Starkman
Journal:  Science       Date:  2009-11-06       Impact factor: 47.728

  3 in total
  5 in total

1.  Gravitational redshift of galaxies in clusters as predicted by general relativity.

Authors:  Radosław Wojtak; Steen H Hansen; Jens Hjorth
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2011-09-28       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Cosmology: gravity tested on large scales.

Authors:  Gary Wegner
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2011-09-28       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Cosmology: Gravity tested on cosmic scales.

Authors:  J Anthony Tyson
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2010-03-11       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 4.  Modified Newtonian Dynamics (MOND): Observational Phenomenology and Relativistic Extensions.

Authors:  Benoît Famaey; Stacy S McGaugh
Journal:  Living Rev Relativ       Date:  2012-09-07       Impact factor: 40.429

Review 5.  Testing general relativity in cosmology.

Authors:  Mustapha Ishak
Journal:  Living Rev Relativ       Date:  2018-12-18       Impact factor: 40.429

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.