| Literature DB >> 20220265 |
Wagih Ghnnam1, Jawid Malek, Emad Shebl, Turky Elbeshry, Ahmad Ibrahim.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Problems during laparoscopic cholecystectomy include bile duct injury, conversion to open operation, and other postoperative complications. We retrospectively evaluated the causes for conversion and the rate of conversion from laparoscopic to open cholecystectomy and assessed the postoperative complications.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2010 PMID: 20220265 PMCID: PMC2855066 DOI: 10.4103/0256-4947.60521
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ann Saudi Med ISSN: 0256-4947 Impact factor: 1.526
Indications for conversion from laparoscopic cholecystectomy to open cholecystectomy.
| Factors contributing to conversion | Number of patients (%) (n = 340) |
|---|---|
| Contracted very small fibrotic adherent gall bladder | 3 (0.9) |
| Gallbladder empyema | 3 (0.9) |
| Unclear anatomy (acute cholecystitis) | 6 (1. 7) |
| Difficult dissection | 3 (0.9) |
| Gallbladder mass (cancer) | 1 (0.3) |
| Common bile duct injury | 1 (0.3) |
Postoperative complications.
| Complication | Number of patients (%) (n=340) |
|---|---|
| Retained stones in common bile duct | 2 (0.6) |
| Common bile duct injury | 2 (0.6) |
| Biliary collection | 1 (0.3) |
| Wound infection | 3 (0.9) |
| Postoperative pyrexia | 4 (1.2) |
Characteristics of laparoscopic and open cholecystectomy groups.
| Laparoscopic (n=323) | Converted (n=17) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Hospital stay | 1.4 (0.2) | 5.9 (3.0) | .003 |
| Mean age | 41.7 (12.5) | 47.2 (14.8) | .001 |
| Operative time | 43.0 (9.7) | 118.0 (26.3) | .001 |
| Males (n=26) | 14 | 12 | .007 |
| Females (n=314) | 309 | 5 |
Values are mean (standard deviation) or number of patients.
Ten cases were emergent (20% of e mergency cases) and seven were elective (2.4% of elective cases).