Literature DB >> 20220231

Faecal indicator bacteria in river biofilms.

M Balzer1, N Witt, H-C Flemming, J Wingender.   

Abstract

Biofilms in surface waters primarily consist of allochthonous microorganisms. Under conditions of pollution faecally derived bacteria may interact with these biofilms. Total coliform bacteria, Escherichia coli and intestinal enterococci are used to monitor source water quality, indicating faecal pollution and the possible presence of enteric pathogens. In the present study the occurrence of faecal indicators was investigated in biofilms (epilithic biofilms, sediments) of German rivers. All of the biofilms contained significant concentrations of these bacteria, which were several orders of magnitude lower compared with the total cell number and the number of culturable heterotrophic plate count bacteria indicating that faecal indicator bacteria represented a minor fraction of the whole biofilm communities. The biofilms displayed approximately two orders of magnitude higher concentrations of total coliforms, E. coli and enterococci compared with the overlying water. Identification of coliform and enterococcal isolates from the biofilms revealed the presence of species which are known to be opportunistic pathogens. Overall, the results of the present study show that faecal indicator bacteria can survive in the presence of high cell densities of the authochthonous microflora in epilithic biofilms and sediments, suggesting that these biofilms may act as a reservoir for bacterial pathogens in polluted rivers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20220231     DOI: 10.2166/wst.2010.022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Water Sci Technol        ISSN: 0273-1223            Impact factor:   1.915


  8 in total

1.  Relationship between enterococcal levels and sediment biofilms at recreational beaches in South Florida.

Authors:  Alan M Piggot; James S Klaus; Sara Johnson; Matthew C Phillips; Helena M Solo-Gabriele
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2012-06-15       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 2.  Biofilms: an emergent form of bacterial life.

Authors:  Hans-Curt Flemming; Jost Wingender; Ulrich Szewzyk; Peter Steinberg; Scott A Rice; Staffan Kjelleberg
Journal:  Nat Rev Microbiol       Date:  2016-08-11       Impact factor: 60.633

3.  Influence of Darkness and Aging on Marine and Freshwater Biofilm Microbial Communities Using Microcosm Experiments.

Authors:  Niyati Hede; Lidita Khandeparker
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2018-01-29       Impact factor: 4.552

4.  Ecological Impacts of Aged Freshwater Biofilms on Estuarine Microbial Communities Elucidated Through Microcosm Experiments: A Microbial Invasion Perspective.

Authors:  Niyati Hede; Lidita Khandeparker
Journal:  Curr Microbiol       Date:  2022-06-06       Impact factor: 2.188

Review 5.  Solid-State NMR Investigations of Extracellular Matrixes and Cell Walls of Algae, Bacteria, Fungi, and Plants.

Authors:  Nader Ghassemi; Alexandre Poulhazan; Fabien Deligey; Frederic Mentink-Vigier; Isabelle Marcotte; Tuo Wang
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2021-12-08       Impact factor: 72.087

Review 6.  EPS-Then and Now.

Authors:  Hans-Curt Flemming
Journal:  Microorganisms       Date:  2016-11-18

7.  A Novel Biofilm Model System to Visualise Conjugal Transfer of Vancomycin Resistance by Environmental Enterococci.

Authors:  Michael Conwell; James S G Dooley; Patrick J Naughton
Journal:  Microorganisms       Date:  2021-04-09

8.  Blood Serum Affects Polysaccharide Production and Surface Protein Expression in S. Aureus.

Authors:  Nazrul Islam; Khwaja G Hossain; Julia M Ross; Mark R Marten
Journal:  Adv Biotechnol Microbiol       Date:  2017-03-03
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.