Literature DB >> 20220100

Distinct frontal systems for response inhibition, attentional capture, and error processing.

D J Sharp1, V Bonnelle, X De Boissezon, C F Beckmann, S G James, M C Patel, M A Mehta.   

Abstract

Stopping an action in response to an unexpected event requires both that the event is attended to, and that the action is inhibited. Previous neuroimaging investigations of stopping have failed to adequately separate these cognitive elements. Here we used a version of the widely used Stop Signal Task that controls for the attentional capture of stop signals. This allowed us to fractionate the contributions of frontal regions, including the right inferior frontal gyrus and medial frontal cortex, to attentional capture, response inhibition, and error processing. A ventral attentional system, including the right inferior frontal gyrus, has been shown to respond to unexpected stimuli. In line with this evidence, we reasoned that lateral frontal regions support attentional capture, whereas medial frontal regions, including the presupplementary motor area (pre-SMA), actually inhibit the ongoing action. We tested this hypothesis by contrasting the brain networks associated with the presentation of unexpected stimuli against those associated with outright stopping. Functional MRI images were obtained in 26 healthy volunteers. Successful stopping was associated with activation of the right inferior frontal gyrus, as well as the pre-SMA. However, only activation of the pre-SMA differentiated stopping from a high-level baseline that controlled for attentional capture. As expected, unsuccessful attempts at stopping activated the anterior cingulate cortex. In keeping with work in nonhuman primates these findings demonstrate that successful motor inhibition is specifically associated with pre-SMA activation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20220100      PMCID: PMC2851908          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1000175107

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  34 in total

Review 1.  ERP components on reaction errors and their functional significance: a tutorial.

Authors:  M Falkenstein; J Hoormann; S Christ; J Hohnsbein
Journal:  Biol Psychol       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 3.251

Review 2.  Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain.

Authors:  Maurizio Corbetta; Gordon L Shulman
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 34.870

3.  Improved optimization for the robust and accurate linear registration and motion correction of brain images.

Authors:  Mark Jenkinson; Peter Bannister; Michael Brady; Stephen Smith
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 6.556

4.  Right inferior prefrontal cortex mediates response inhibition while mesial prefrontal cortex is responsible for error detection.

Authors:  Katya Rubia; Anna B Smith; Michael J Brammer; Eric Taylor
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  Stop-signal inhibition disrupted by damage to right inferior frontal gyrus in humans.

Authors:  Adam R Aron; Paul C Fletcher; Ed T Bullmore; Barbara J Sahakian; Trevor W Robbins
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 24.884

6.  Neural correlates of attentional capture in visual search.

Authors:  Jan de Fockert; Geraint Rees; Chris Frith; Nilli Lavie
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 7.  Advances in functional and structural MR image analysis and implementation as FSL.

Authors:  Stephen M Smith; Mark Jenkinson; Mark W Woolrich; Christian F Beckmann; Timothy E J Behrens; Heidi Johansen-Berg; Peter R Bannister; Marilena De Luca; Ivana Drobnjak; David E Flitney; Rami K Niazy; James Saunders; John Vickers; Yongyue Zhang; Nicola De Stefano; J Michael Brady; Paul M Matthews
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 6.556

8.  On the ability to inhibit simple and choice reaction time responses: a model and a method.

Authors:  G D Logan; W B Cowan; K A Davis
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1984-04       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  Dissociation between conflict detection and error monitoring in the human anterior cingulate cortex.

Authors:  Diane Swick; And U Turken
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-11-27       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Functional connectivity delineates distinct roles of the inferior frontal cortex and presupplementary motor area in stop signal inhibition.

Authors:  Jeng-Ren Duann; Jaime S Ide; Xi Luo; Chiang-shan Ray Li
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-08-12       Impact factor: 6.167

View more
  215 in total

1.  The role of the right presupplementary motor area in stopping action: two studies with event-related transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  Weidong Cai; Jobi S George; Frederick Verbruggen; Christopher D Chambers; Adam R Aron
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-04-18       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Functional parcellation of the inferior frontal and midcingulate cortices in a flanker-stop-change paradigm.

Authors:  Stefanie Enriquez-Geppert; Tom Eichele; Karsten Specht; Harald Kugel; Christo Pantev; René J Huster
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2012-03-16       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  Aging and inhibitory control of action: cortico-subthalamic connection strength predicts stopping performance.

Authors:  James P Coxon; Annouchka Van Impe; Nicole Wenderoth; Stephan P Swinnen
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-06-13       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Theta burst stimulation dissociates attention and action updating in human inferior frontal cortex.

Authors:  Frederick Verbruggen; Adam R Aron; Michaël A Stevens; Christopher D Chambers
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-07-14       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Phasic stabilization of motor output after auditory and visual distractors.

Authors:  Harri Piitulainen; Mathieu Bourguignon; Eero Smeds; Xavier De Tiège; Veikko Jousmäki; Riitta Hari
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2015-09-29       Impact factor: 5.038

6.  Brain stimulation improves cognitive control by modulating medial-frontal activity and preSMA-vmPFC functional connectivity.

Authors:  Jiaxin Yu; Philip Tseng; Daisy L Hung; Shih-Wei Wu; Chi-Hung Juan
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2015-08-07       Impact factor: 5.038

7.  Anticipatory reward processing among cocaine-dependent individuals with and without concurrent methadone-maintenance treatment: Relationship to treatment response.

Authors:  Sarah W Yip; Elise E DeVito; Hedy Kober; Patrick D Worhunsky; Kathleen M Carroll; Marc N Potenza
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2016-07-16       Impact factor: 4.492

8.  Right prefrontal and ventral striatum interactions underlying impulsive choice and impulsive responding.

Authors:  Brendan Behan; Adam Stone; Hugh Garavan
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2014-08-26       Impact factor: 5.038

9.  Neural activation during response inhibition differentiates blast from mechanical causes of mild to moderate traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  Barbara L Fischer; Michael Parsons; Sally Durgerian; Christine Reece; Lyla Mourany; Mark J Lowe; Erik B Beall; Katherine A Koenig; Stephen E Jones; Mary R Newsome; Randall S Scheibel; Elisabeth A Wilde; Maya Troyanskaya; Tricia L Merkley; Mark Walker; Harvey S Levin; Stephen M Rao
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2013-11-01       Impact factor: 5.269

10.  Anxiety, a benefit and detriment to cognition: behavioral and magnetoencephalographic evidence from a mixed-saccade task.

Authors:  Brian R Cornwell; Sven C Mueller; Raphael Kaplan; Christian Grillon; Monique Ernst
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  2012-01-29       Impact factor: 2.310

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.