Literature DB >> 20219699

A paradigm shift in imaging for renal colic - Is it time to say good bye to an old trusted friend?

Farhan Ahmed1, Abdul Mueed Zafar, Nadir Khan, Zishan Haider, M Hammad Ather.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To study the changing pattern in the use of intravenous urogram (IVU) and non-contrast enhanced CT (CTKUB) for evaluation of flank pain at a single centre.
METHODS: All patients who underwent either an IVU or CTKUB at a single, tertiary care center from January 2002 to December 2007 were retrospectively identified from the radiology database. Study samples were-divided into two groups: Pediatric (14 years or less) and Adult (greater than 14 years). For each group, overall trends as well as trends across referral setting and gender were explored by plotting line graphs using SPSS version 15.
RESULTS: During the study period a total of 11245 uro-radiological examinations were performed using either IVU (43.7%, n=4915) or CTKUB (56.3%, n=6330). A remarkable majority of procedures (95.5%, n=10741) was performed in adult patients. Overall, the respective proportions of IVU and CTKUB were 87.9% (n=43) and 12.1% (n=61) in the pediatric group whereas 41.6% (n=4472) and 58.4% (n=6269) in adults. Majority in both groups were ambulatory patients (Pediatrics 83.7%, Adults 76.7%). During 2002-20007, the yearly proportion of CTKUB increased from 27% to 80% in adults and from 3% to 27% in children.
CONCLUSIONS: There is major shift in the choice of imaging in adults from IVU to CTKUB during years 2002-2007. In pediatric patients, IVU referrals still comprise the greater proportion of uro-radiological exams. Copyright 2010 Surgical Associates Ltd. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20219699     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2010.02.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Surg        ISSN: 1743-9159            Impact factor:   6.071


  5 in total

1.  Radiation exposure among patients with the highest CT scan utilization in the emergency department.

Authors:  Kaushal H Shah; Benjamin H Slovis; Dan Runde; Brandon Godbout; David H Newman; Jarone Lee
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2013-07-14

2.  Computed tomography utilization rates after the placement of a scanner in an emergency department: a single-center experience.

Authors:  Daniel Runde; Kaushal Shah; Leily Naraghi; Brandon Godbout; Jonathan Kirschner; David Newman; Dan Wiener; Jarone Lee
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2014-04-12

3.  Diagnostic Accuracy of Doppler Twinkling Artifact for Identifying Urinary Tract Calculi.

Authors:  Hatem Adel; Amjad Sattar; Anila Rahim; Anum Aftab; Syed Omair Adil
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2019-09-13

4.  Has the significance of incidental findings on unenhanced computed tomography for urolithiasis been overestimated? A retrospective review of over 800 patients.

Authors:  Nadir Khan; M Hammad Ather; Farhan Ahmed; Abdul M Zafar; Aamir Khan
Journal:  Arab J Urol       Date:  2012-02-20

5.  Comparison of ureteric stone size, on bone window versus standard soft-tissue window settings, on multi-detector non-contrast computed tomography.

Authors:  Hussam Uddin Soomro; M Hammad Ather; Basit Salam
Journal:  Arab J Urol       Date:  2016-07-26
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.