Literature DB >> 20218737

Relative expression analysis for molecular cancer diagnosis and prognosis.

James A Eddy1, Jaeyun Sung, Donald Geman, Nathan D Price.   

Abstract

The enormous amount of biomolecule measurement data generated from high-throughput technologies has brought an increased need for computational tools in biological analyses. Such tools can enhance our understanding of human health and genetic diseases, such as cancer, by accurately classifying phenotypes, detecting the presence of disease, discriminating among cancer sub-types, predicting clinical outcomes, and characterizing disease progression. In the case of gene expression microarray data, standard statistical learning methods have been used to identify classifiers that can accurately distinguish disease phenotypes. However, these mathematical prediction rules are often highly complex, and they lack the convenience and simplicity desired for extracting underlying biological meaning or transitioning into the clinic. In this review, we survey a powerful collection of computational methods for analyzing transcriptomic microarray data that address these limitations. Relative Expression Analysis (RXA) is based only on the relative orderings among the expressions of a small number of genes. Specifically, we provide a description of the first and simplest example of RXA, the K-TSP classifier, which is based on _ pairs of genes; the case K = 1 is the TSP classifier. Given their simplicity and ease of biological interpretation, as well as their invariance to data normalization and parameter-fitting, these classifiers have been widely applied in aiding molecular diagnostics in a broad range of human cancers. We review several studies which demonstrate accurate classification of disease phenotypes (e.g., cancer vs. normal), cancer subclasses (e.g., AML vs. ALL, GIST vs. LMS), disease outcomes (e.g., metastasis, survival), and diverse human pathologies assayed through blood-borne leukocytes. The studies presented demonstrate that RXA-specifically the TSP and K-TSP classifiers-is a promising new class of computational methods for analyzing high-throughput data, and has the potential to significantly contribute to molecular cancer diagnosis and prognosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20218737      PMCID: PMC2921829          DOI: 10.1177/153303461000900204

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Technol Cancer Res Treat        ISSN: 1533-0338


  36 in total

1.  A CART-based approach to discover emerging patterns in microarray data.

Authors:  Anne-Laure Boulesteix; Gerhard Tutz; Korbinian Strimmer
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2003-12-12       Impact factor: 6.937

Review 2.  Historical perspective on hormonal therapy of advanced breast cancer.

Authors:  Craig Jordan
Journal:  Clin Ther       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 3.393

3.  Gene set enrichment analysis: a knowledge-based approach for interpreting genome-wide expression profiles.

Authors:  Aravind Subramanian; Pablo Tamayo; Vamsi K Mootha; Sayan Mukherjee; Benjamin L Ebert; Michael A Gillette; Amanda Paulovich; Scott L Pomeroy; Todd R Golub; Eric S Lander; Jill P Mesirov
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-09-30       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Cell and tumor classification using gene expression data: construction of forests.

Authors:  Heping Zhang; Chang-Yung Yu; Burton Singer
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-03-17       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Simple decision rules for classifying human cancers from gene expression profiles.

Authors:  Aik Choon Tan; Daniel Q Naiman; Lei Xu; Raimond L Winslow; Donald Geman
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2005-08-16       Impact factor: 6.937

Review 6.  Antiestrogen resistance in breast cancer and the role of estrogen receptor signaling.

Authors:  Robert Clarke; Minetta C Liu; Kerrie B Bouker; Zhiping Gu; Richard Y Lee; Yuelin Zhu; Todd C Skaar; Bianca Gomez; Kerry O'Brien; Yue Wang; Leena A Hilakivi-Clarke
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2003-10-20       Impact factor: 9.867

Review 7.  WITHDRAWN: Tamoxifen for early breast cancer.

Authors:  Mike J Clarke
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2008-10-08

8.  Highly accurate two-gene classifier for differentiating gastrointestinal stromal tumors and leiomyosarcomas.

Authors:  Nathan D Price; Jonathan Trent; Adel K El-Naggar; David Cogdell; Ellen Taylor; Kelly K Hunt; Raphael E Pollock; Leroy Hood; Ilya Shmulevich; Wei Zhang
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-02-21       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Gene expression correlates of clinical prostate cancer behavior.

Authors:  Dinesh Singh; Phillip G Febbo; Kenneth Ross; Donald G Jackson; Judith Manola; Christine Ladd; Pablo Tamayo; Andrew A Renshaw; Anthony V D'Amico; Jerome P Richie; Eric S Lander; Massimo Loda; Philip W Kantoff; Todd R Golub; William R Sellers
Journal:  Cancer Cell       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 31.743

10.  GSEA-P: a desktop application for Gene Set Enrichment Analysis.

Authors:  Aravind Subramanian; Heidi Kuehn; Joshua Gould; Pablo Tamayo; Jill P Mesirov
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2007-07-20       Impact factor: 6.937

View more
  52 in total

1.  Has discovery-based cancer research been a bust?

Authors:  R J Epstein
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2013-09-04       Impact factor: 3.405

2.  Graphics processing unit implementations of relative expression analysis algorithms enable dramatic computational speedup.

Authors:  Andrew T Magis; John C Earls; Youn-Hee Ko; James A Eddy; Nathan D Price
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2011-01-20       Impact factor: 6.937

3.  switchBox: an R package for k-Top Scoring Pairs classifier development.

Authors:  Bahman Afsari; Elana J Fertig; Donald Geman; Luigi Marchionni
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2014-09-26       Impact factor: 6.937

4.  Development and validation of a hypoxia-related gene pair signature to predict overall survival in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Zhao Ding; Hefeng Li; Deshun Yu
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2021-01-15       Impact factor: 2.503

5.  A qualitative transcriptional signature to reclassify histological grade of ER-positive breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Jing Li; Wenbin Jiang; Qirui Liang; Guanghao Liu; Yupeng Dai; Hailong Zheng; Jing Yang; Hao Cai; Guo Zheng
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2020-04-06       Impact factor: 3.969

6.  Development and verification of a personalized immune prognostic feature in breast cancer.

Authors:  HongLei Wang; Li Wu; HongTao Wang
Journal:  Exp Biol Med (Maywood)       Date:  2020-06-29

7.  A qualitative transcriptional signature for the early diagnosis of colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Qingzhou Guan; Qiuhong Zeng; Haidan Yan; Jiajing Xie; Jun Cheng; Lu Ao; Jun He; Wenyuan Zhao; Kui Chen; You Guo; Guoxian Guan; Zheng Guo
Journal:  Cancer Sci       Date:  2019-09-03       Impact factor: 6.716

8.  Challenges in Biomarker Discovery: Combining Expert Insights with Statistical Analysis of Complex Omics Data.

Authors:  Jason E McDermott; Jing Wang; Hugh Mitchell; Bobbie-Jo Webb-Robertson; Ryan Hafen; John Ramey; Karin D Rodland
Journal:  Expert Opin Med Diagn       Date:  2013-01

9.  Detecting Pairwise Interactive Effects of Continuous Random Variables for Biomarker Identification with Small Sample Size.

Authors:  Amin Ahmadi Adl; Hye-Seung Lee; Xiaoning Qian
Journal:  IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform       Date:  2016-06-28       Impact factor: 3.710

10.  Multiclass cancer classification based on gene expression comparison.

Authors:  Sitan Yang; Daniel Q Naiman
Journal:  Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol       Date:  2014-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.